From: "pankaj.dubey" <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kgene.kim@samsung.com, thomas.ab@samsung.com,
p.fedin@samsung.com, andi.shyti@samsung.com
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:09:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56737FF7.6060907@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com>
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12.12.2015 16:43, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> THIS IS A RESEND OF ONCE MERGED INTO kgene/for-next AND LOST PATCHES
>>
>> Series v5 got merged in kgene/for-next but due to last moment change before pull
>> these patches were not accepted during 4.3 merge window.After that kgene/for-next
>> got rebased over 4.4-rc1 these patches got dropped into another branch and till
>> date not included to for-next.
>>
>> Since then due to minor change in "drivers/soc/", patches are not getting applied
>> cleanly so rebasing on current for-next and resending all these with fix in memory
>> mapping included.
>>
>>
>> This patch set adds support for Exynos SROM controller DT based driver.
>> Currently SROM register sets are used only during S2R, so driver
>> basically added for taking care of S2R. It will help us in removing
>> static mapping from exynos.c and other extra code handline during S2R.
>>
>> This patch set also updated exynos4 and exynos5 dtsi files for with device
>> node for srom, and added binding documentation for the same.
>>
>> First two patches are some minor cleanup in mach-exynos.
>>
>> Patchset v1 was posted here[1]
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/29/98
>> Patchset v2 was posted here[2]
>> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/24/125
>> Patchset v3 was posted here[3]
>> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/392
>> Patchset v3 was posted here[4]
>> [4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/19/278
>>
>> This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot
>> and S2R functionality.
>
> Let me share the plan/status:
Thanks for sharing status on this.
> 1. Currently Kukjin Kim is on out of office (he told me he will be back
> on Christmas).
> 2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my requests.
>
> 3. I applied this patchset to my branch:
> next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
>
> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
> depending on the timing of arm-soc/Christmas/Kukjin this may or may not
> go into v4.5 (yay...).
>
I am fine in either way. But prefer if it goes in v4.5, just to save
time in rebasing.
> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
> for v4.6.
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pankaj.dubey@samsung.com (pankaj.dubey)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver
Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:09:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56737FF7.6060907@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <567244C4.8080708@samsung.com>
Hi Krzysztof,
On Thursday 17 December 2015 10:44 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 12.12.2015 16:43, Pankaj Dubey wrote:
>> THIS IS A RESEND OF ONCE MERGED INTO kgene/for-next AND LOST PATCHES
>>
>> Series v5 got merged in kgene/for-next but due to last moment change before pull
>> these patches were not accepted during 4.3 merge window.After that kgene/for-next
>> got rebased over 4.4-rc1 these patches got dropped into another branch and till
>> date not included to for-next.
>>
>> Since then due to minor change in "drivers/soc/", patches are not getting applied
>> cleanly so rebasing on current for-next and resending all these with fix in memory
>> mapping included.
>>
>>
>> This patch set adds support for Exynos SROM controller DT based driver.
>> Currently SROM register sets are used only during S2R, so driver
>> basically added for taking care of S2R. It will help us in removing
>> static mapping from exynos.c and other extra code handline during S2R.
>>
>> This patch set also updated exynos4 and exynos5 dtsi files for with device
>> node for srom, and added binding documentation for the same.
>>
>> First two patches are some minor cleanup in mach-exynos.
>>
>> Patchset v1 was posted here[1]
>> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/29/98
>> Patchset v2 was posted here[2]
>> [2]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/8/24/125
>> Patchset v3 was posted here[3]
>> [3]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/392
>> Patchset v3 was posted here[4]
>> [4]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/19/278
>>
>> This patchset, I have tested on Peach-Pi (Exynos5880) based chromebook for boot
>> and S2R functionality.
>
> Let me share the plan/status:
Thanks for sharing status on this.
> 1. Currently Kukjin Kim is on out of office (he told me he will be back
> on Christmas).
> 2. I asked arm-soc people to pull my requests.
>
> 3. I applied this patchset to my branch:
> next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/log/?h=next/stuff-late-not-split-per-branch
>
> 4. This branch is not pushed to linux-next. I will sort it out if my
> previous pull requests get in. I will be out of office for Christmas so
> depending on the timing of arm-soc/Christmas/Kukjin this may or may not
> go into v4.5 (yay...).
>
I am fine in either way. But prefer if it goes in v4.5, just to save
time in rebasing.
> 5. If it does not get into v4.5, I will rebase it and proceed further
> for v4.6.
>
> If you have any questions, please let me know.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
>
Thanks,
Pankaj Dubey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-18 3:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-12 7:43 [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 1/8] ARM: EXYNOS: remove unused static mapping of CMU for exynos5 Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 2/8] ARM: EXYNOS: code cleanup in map.h Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 3/8] dt-bindings: add exynos-srom device tree binding Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 4/8] ARM: dts: add SROM device node for exynos4 Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 5/8] ARM: dts: add SROM device node for exynos5 Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:43 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 6/8] drivers: soc: add support for exynos SROM driver Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 7/8] MAINTAINERS: add maintainers entry for drivers/soc/samsung Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 8/8] ARM: EXYNOS: Remove SROM related register settings from mach-exynos Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-12 7:44 ` Pankaj Dubey
2015-12-14 7:39 ` [RESEND PATCH v5 0/8] Add support for Exynos SROM Controller driver Pavel Fedin
2015-12-14 7:39 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-12-17 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-12-17 5:14 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-12-18 3:39 ` pankaj.dubey [this message]
2015-12-18 3:39 ` pankaj.dubey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56737FF7.6060907@samsung.com \
--to=pankaj.dubey@samsung.com \
--cc=andi.shyti@samsung.com \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=thomas.ab@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.