All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
@ 2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudeep Holla
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar,
	open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE SCPI Message...,
	open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS, open list

The function can return negative values, so its result should
be assigned to signed variable.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
 
 static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
+	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
 
 	if (domain < 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
@ 2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

The function can return negative values, so its result should
be assigned to signed variable.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
 
 static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
+	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
 
 	if (domain < 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
@ 2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sudeep Holla
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Rafael J. Wysocki, Viresh Kumar,
	open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE (SCPI) Message...,
	open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS, open list

The function can return negative values, so its result should
be assigned to signed variable.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
 
 static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
 {
-	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
+	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
 
 	if (domain < 0)
 		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
  2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
  (?)
@ 2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij, Ray Jui, Scott Branden, Jon Mason
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM,
	moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	open list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list

Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
loop will never end.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 				 u16 *strength)
 {
-	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
+	unsigned int offset, shift;
+	int i;
 	u32 val;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
@ 2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
loop will never end.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 				 u16 *strength)
 {
-	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
+	unsigned int offset, shift;
+	int i;
 	u32 val;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
@ 2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Walleij, Ray Jui, Scott Branden, Jon Mason
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM,
	moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	open list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list

Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
loop will never end.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
@@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
 				 u16 *strength)
 {
-	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
+	unsigned int offset, shift;
+	int i;
 	u32 val;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe
  2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lauro Ramos Venancio, Aloisio Almeida Jr, Samuel Ortiz
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	open list:NFC SUBSYSTEM, open list

The function return NCI_HCI_INVALID_PIPE in case of error.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 net/nfc/nci/hci.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
index 2aedac1..a0ab26d 100644
--- a/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
+++ b/net/nfc/nci/hci.c
@@ -676,7 +676,7 @@ int nci_hci_connect_gate(struct nci_dev *ndev,
 	break;
 	default:
 		pipe = nci_hci_create_pipe(ndev, dest_host, dest_gate, &r);
-		if (pipe < 0)
+		if (pipe == NCI_HCI_INVALID_PIPE)
 			return r;
 		pipe_created = true;
 		break;
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown
  Cc: alsa-devel, Kuninori Morimoto, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	open list, Takashi Iwai, Andrzej Hajda, Marek Szyprowski

Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 0b91692..8ca30fd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 
 	rsnd_mod_power_off(mod);
 
-	ssi->usrcnt--;
-
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
+	if (ssi->usrcnt > 0)
+		ssi->usrcnt--;
+	else
 		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
 			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
@ 2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-23 10:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai, Kuninori Morimoto,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list

Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 0b91692..8ca30fd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -381,9 +381,9 @@ rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 
 	rsnd_mod_power_off(mod);
 
-	ssi->usrcnt--;
-
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
+	if (ssi->usrcnt > 0)
+		ssi->usrcnt--;
+	else
 		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
 			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
 
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
  2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-23 10:41   ` Viresh Kumar
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-12-23 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Sudeep Holla, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Rafael J. Wysocki,
	open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE (SCPI) Message...,
	open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS, open list

On 23-12-15, 11:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
>  
>  static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
>  {
> -	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> +	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
>  
>  	if (domain < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
@ 2015-12-23 10:41   ` Viresh Kumar
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Viresh Kumar @ 2015-12-23 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On 23-12-15, 11:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> index 2c3b16f..de5e89b 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/scpi-cpufreq.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static struct scpi_ops *scpi_ops;
>  
>  static struct scpi_dvfs_info *scpi_get_dvfs_info(struct device *cpu_dev)
>  {
> -	u8 domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
> +	int domain = topology_physical_package_id(cpu_dev->id);
>  
>  	if (domain < 0)
>  		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
  2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-23 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2015-12-23 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda, Rafael J. Wysocki
  Cc: Sudeep Holla, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Viresh Kumar,
	open list:SYSTEM CONTROL & POWER INTERFACE (SCPI) Message...,
	open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS, open list



On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>

There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.

[1] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id
@ 2015-12-23 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2015-12-23 10:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel



On 23/12/15 10:37, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> The function can return negative values, so its result should
> be assigned to signed variable.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>

There has a patch posted by Dan Carpenter [1] which I reposted[2],
but it again slipped through the cracks. I will poke Rafael again on that.

[1] 
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-October/380292.html
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/12/15/219

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
  2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-23 22:35     ` Ray Jui
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Ray Jui @ 2015-12-23 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda, Linus Walleij, Scott Branden, Jon Mason
  Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM,
	moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	open list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list,
	Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy

+ Reddy

On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   				 u16 *strength)
>   {
> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
> +	int i;
>   	u32 val;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
>

The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
_get_strength is inconsistent:

In _set_strength:

427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {

For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.

428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
432                 offset += 4;
433         }

In _get_strength:

451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
453                 val >>= shift;
454                 *strength += (val << i);
455                 offset += 4;
456         }

Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Thanks,

Ray



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
@ 2015-12-23 22:35     ` Ray Jui
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Ray Jui @ 2015-12-23 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

+ Reddy

On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>   				 u16 *strength)
>   {
> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
> +	int i;
>   	u32 val;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
>

The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
_get_strength is inconsistent:

In _set_strength:

427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {

For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.

428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
432                 offset += 4;
433         }

In _get_strength:

451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
453                 val >>= shift;
454                 *strength += (val << i);
455                 offset += 4;
456         }

Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Thanks,

Ray

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
  (?)
@ 2015-12-24  0:04   ` Kuninori Morimoto
  2015-12-24  5:56     ` Andrzej Hajda
  -1 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2015-12-24  0:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list


Hi Andrzej

> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---

Thank you for your patch. good catch !
I noticed current error case is not good for ssi.c
Can you agree below ?

---------
diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 7db05fd..e519e30 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -403,6 +403,12 @@ static int rsnd_ssi_quit(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
 	struct rsnd_ssi *ssi = rsnd_mod_to_ssi(mod);
 	struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
 
+	if (!ssi->usrcnt) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
+			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
 	if (rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io))
 		goto rsnd_ssi_quit_end;
 
@@ -422,10 +428,6 @@ rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 
 	ssi->usrcnt--;
 
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
-			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
---------


Best regards
---
Kuninori Morimoto

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
  2015-12-23 22:35     ` Ray Jui
@ 2015-12-24  5:33       ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy @ 2015-12-24  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ray Jui, Andrzej Hajda, Linus Walleij, Scott Branden, Jon Mason
  Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM,
	moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	bcm-kernel-feedback-list, open list



On 12/24/2015 4:05 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
> + Reddy
>
> On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
>> loop will never end.
>>
>> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
>> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>>
>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   				 u16 *strength)
>>   {
>> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
>> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
>> +	int i;
>>   	u32 val;
>>   	unsigned long flags;
>>
>>
> The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
> issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
> _get_strength is inconsistent:
>
> In _set_strength:
>
> 427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {
>
> For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.
>
> 428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
> 430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
> 431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 432                 offset += 4;
> 433         }
>
> In _get_strength:
>
> 451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
> 452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
> 453                 val >>= shift;
> 454                 *strength += (val << i);
> 455                 offset += 4;
> 456         }
>
> Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Hi Ray,

             The logic is correct. The drive strength has three bits distributed in three registers. In one case the "-1" is in for loop initialization and the other case it is in the for loop body. The fix looks good.

Thanks
Dhananjay

> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
@ 2015-12-24  5:33       ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy @ 2015-12-24  5:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel



On 12/24/2015 4:05 AM, Ray Jui wrote:
> + Reddy
>
> On 12/23/2015 2:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
>> loop will never end.
>>
>> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
>> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>>
>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c | 3 ++-
>>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> index 34648f6..ad5b04c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/bcm/pinctrl-nsp-gpio.c
>> @@ -439,7 +439,8 @@ static int nsp_gpio_set_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   static int nsp_gpio_get_strength(struct nsp_gpio *chip, unsigned gpio,
>>   				 u16 *strength)
>>   {
>> -	unsigned int i, offset, shift;
>> +	unsigned int offset, shift;
>> +	int i;
>>   	u32 val;
>>   	unsigned long flags;
>>
>>
> The fix is a valid fix. And at the same time it exposes other potential 
> issues in the driver. I just found the loop used in _set_strength and 
> _get_strength is inconsistent:
>
> In _set_strength:
>
> 427         for (i = GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS; i > 0; i--) {
>
> For i to start at GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS, it seems to be wrong.
>
> 428                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 429                 val &= ~BIT(shift);
> 430                 val |= ((strength >> (i-1)) & 0x1) << shift;
> 431                 writel(val, chip->io_ctrl + offset);
> 432                 offset += 4;
> 433         }
>
> In _get_strength:
>
> 451         for (i = (GPIO_DRV_STRENGTH_BITS - 1); i >= 0; i--) {
> 452                 val = readl(chip->io_ctrl + offset) & BIT(shift);
> 453                 val >>= shift;
> 454                 *strength += (val << i);
> 455                 offset += 4;
> 456         }
>
> Reddy, could you please review and comment?

Hi Ray,

             The logic is correct. The drive strength has three bits distributed in three registers. In one case the "-1" is in for loop initialization and the other case it is in the for loop body. The fix looks good.

Thanks
Dhananjay

> Thanks,
>
> Ray
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-24  0:04   ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2015-12-24  5:56     ` Andrzej Hajda
  2015-12-24  6:14         ` Kuninori Morimoto
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-24  5:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Kuninori Morimoto
  Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list

On 12/24/2015 01:04 AM, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> Hi Andrzej
>
>> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
>>
>> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
>> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>>
>> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
>> ---
> Thank you for your patch. good catch !
> I noticed current error case is not good for ssi.c
> Can you agree below ?
Yes, of course.

Regards
Andrzej
>
> ---------
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
> index 7db05fd..e519e30 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
> @@ -403,6 +403,12 @@ static int rsnd_ssi_quit(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
>  	struct rsnd_ssi *ssi = rsnd_mod_to_ssi(mod);
>  	struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
>  
> +	if (!ssi->usrcnt) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
> +			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +
>  	if (rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io))
>  		goto rsnd_ssi_quit_end;
>  
> @@ -422,10 +428,6 @@ rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
>  
>  	ssi->usrcnt--;
>  
> -	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
> -			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> ---------
>
>
> Best regards
> ---
> Kuninori Morimoto
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-24  5:56     ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-24  6:14         ` Kuninori Morimoto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2015-12-24  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	Liam Girdwood, open list, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Takashi Iwai,
	Mark Brown, Marek Szyprowski


Hi Andrzej

> >> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> >>
> >> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> >> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> >>
> >> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> > Thank you for your patch. good catch !
> > I noticed current error case is not good for ssi.c
> > Can you agree below ?
> Yes, of course.

Thanks.
Who send this patch ? you or me ?
I think you can do it ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
@ 2015-12-24  6:14         ` Kuninori Morimoto
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2015-12-24  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list


Hi Andrzej

> >> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> >>
> >> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> >> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> >>
> >> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> >> ---
> > Thank you for your patch. good catch !
> > I noticed current error case is not good for ssi.c
> > Can you agree below ?
> Yes, of course.

Thanks.
Who send this patch ? you or me ?
I think you can do it ?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-24  6:14         ` Kuninori Morimoto
@ 2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-24  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Kuninori Morimoto
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list

Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
v2: changed according to Kuninori Morimoto advice
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 0b91692..f23c921 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -364,29 +364,30 @@ static int rsnd_ssi_quit(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
 	struct rsnd_ssi *ssi = rsnd_mod_to_ssi(mod);
 	struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
 
-	if (rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io))
-		goto rsnd_ssi_quit_end;
+	if (!ssi->usrcnt) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
+			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 
-	if (ssi->err > 0)
-		dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
-			 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod), ssi->err);
+	if (!rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io)) {
+		if (ssi->err > 0)
+			dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
+				 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod),
+				 ssi->err);
 
-	ssi->cr_own	= 0;
-	ssi->err	= 0;
+		ssi->cr_own	= 0;
+		ssi->err	= 0;
 
-	rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+		rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+	}
 
-rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 	rsnd_ssi_master_clk_stop(ssi, io);
 
 	rsnd_mod_power_off(mod);
 
 	ssi->usrcnt--;
 
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
-			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
@ 2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Andrzej Hajda @ 2015-12-24  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Kuninori Morimoto
  Cc: Andrzej Hajda, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Marek Szyprowski,
	Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list

Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
---
v2: changed according to Kuninori Morimoto advice
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 0b91692..f23c921 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -364,29 +364,30 @@ static int rsnd_ssi_quit(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
 	struct rsnd_ssi *ssi = rsnd_mod_to_ssi(mod);
 	struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
 
-	if (rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io))
-		goto rsnd_ssi_quit_end;
+	if (!ssi->usrcnt) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
+			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 
-	if (ssi->err > 0)
-		dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
-			 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod), ssi->err);
+	if (!rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io)) {
+		if (ssi->err > 0)
+			dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
+				 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod),
+				 ssi->err);
 
-	ssi->cr_own	= 0;
-	ssi->err	= 0;
+		ssi->cr_own	= 0;
+		ssi->err	= 0;
 
-	rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+		rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+	}
 
-rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 	rsnd_ssi_master_clk_stop(ssi, io);
 
 	rsnd_mod_power_off(mod);
 
 	ssi->usrcnt--;
 
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
-			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.9.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
  (?)
@ 2015-12-24  7:38           ` Kuninori Morimoto
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Kuninori Morimoto @ 2015-12-24  7:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Liam Girdwood, Mark Brown, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list


Hi
> 
> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
> and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.
> 
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
> 
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
> ---

Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
  2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-24  9:03     ` Linus Walleij
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-12-24  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Ray Jui, Scott Branden, Jon Mason, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, open list:PIN CONTROL SUBSYSTEM,
	moderated list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE,
	open list:BROADCOM IPROC ARM ARCHITECTURE, open list

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:

> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

I already applied Dan Carpenters fix, somehow it was earlier
in my mail flow. Thanks anyways!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator
@ 2015-12-24  9:03     ` Linus Walleij
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2015-12-24  9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-arm-kernel

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> wrote:

> Iterator i declared as unsigned is always non-negative so the
> loop will never end.
>
> The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
> scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].
>
> [1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>

I already applied Dan Carpenters fix, somehow it was earlier
in my mail flow. Thanks anyways!

Yours,
Linus Walleij

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
  2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
@ 2015-12-30 17:12             ` Mark Brown
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2015-12-30 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	Kuninori Morimoto, Liam Girdwood, open list,
	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz, Takashi Iwai, Marek Szyprowski


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
> and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.

Please don't send new patches in reply to old ones, it makes it hard to
figure out what the current version of things is.

[-- Attachment #1.2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 0 bytes --]



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug
@ 2015-12-30 17:12             ` Mark Brown
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2015-12-30 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda
  Cc: Liam Girdwood, Kuninori Morimoto, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz,
	Marek Szyprowski, Jaroslav Kysela, Takashi Iwai,
	moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM...,
	open list

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 379 bytes --]

On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 08:02:39AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
> The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
> and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.

Please don't send new patches in reply to old ones, it makes it hard to
figure out what the current version of things is.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

* Applied "ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug" to the asoc tree
  2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
                             ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  (?)
@ 2015-12-30 18:05           ` Mark Brown
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 29+ messages in thread
From: Mark Brown @ 2015-12-30 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrzej Hajda, Kuninori Morimoto, Mark Brown; +Cc: alsa-devel

The patch

   ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From e5d9cfc6f5fe56caa44cefbc7ef4531c480d901d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 08:02:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug

Field usrcnt is unsigned so it cannot be lesser than zero.
The patch fixes the check, moves it to the beginning of the function
and changes return value to -EIO in case of usercnt error.

The problem has been detected using proposed semantic patch
scripts/coccinelle/tests/unsigned_lesser_than_zero.cocci [1].

[1]: http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2038576

Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
index 7db05fdfb656..7ee89da4dd5f 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -403,29 +403,30 @@ static int rsnd_ssi_quit(struct rsnd_mod *mod,
 	struct rsnd_ssi *ssi = rsnd_mod_to_ssi(mod);
 	struct device *dev = rsnd_priv_to_dev(priv);
 
-	if (rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io))
-		goto rsnd_ssi_quit_end;
+	if (!ssi->usrcnt) {
+		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
+			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
+		return -EIO;
+	}
 
-	if (ssi->err > 0)
-		dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
-			 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod), ssi->err);
+	if (!rsnd_ssi_is_parent(mod, io)) {
+		if (ssi->err > 0)
+			dev_warn(dev, "%s[%d] under/over flow err = %d\n",
+				 rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod),
+				 ssi->err);
 
-	ssi->cr_own	= 0;
-	ssi->err	= 0;
+		ssi->cr_own	= 0;
+		ssi->err	= 0;
 
-	rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+		rsnd_ssi_irq_disable(mod);
+	}
 
-rsnd_ssi_quit_end:
 	rsnd_ssi_master_clk_stop(ssi, io);
 
 	rsnd_mod_power_off(mod);
 
 	ssi->usrcnt--;
 
-	if (ssi->usrcnt < 0)
-		dev_err(dev, "%s[%d] usrcnt error\n",
-			rsnd_mod_name(mod), rsnd_mod_id(mod));
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.6.2

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 29+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-12-30 18:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-23 10:37 [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: nsp-gpio: fix type of iterator Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 22:35   ` Ray Jui
2015-12-23 22:35     ` Ray Jui
2015-12-24  5:33     ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
2015-12-24  5:33       ` Yendapally Reddy Dhananjaya Reddy
2015-12-24  9:03   ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-24  9:03     ` Linus Walleij
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] NFC: nci: fix handling return value of nci_hci_create_pipe Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37 ` [PATCH] ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-23 10:37   ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24  0:04   ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24  5:56     ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24  6:14       ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24  6:14         ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-24  7:02         ` [PATCH v2] " Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24  7:02           ` Andrzej Hajda
2015-12-24  7:38           ` Kuninori Morimoto
2015-12-30 17:12           ` Mark Brown
2015-12-30 17:12             ` Mark Brown
2015-12-30 18:05           ` Applied "ASoC: rsnd: fix usrcnt decrementing bug" to the asoc tree Mark Brown
2015-12-23 10:41 ` [PATCH] cpufreq/scpi: fix handling return value of topology_physical_package_id Viresh Kumar
2015-12-23 10:41   ` Viresh Kumar
2015-12-23 10:48 ` Sudeep Holla
2015-12-23 10:48   ` Sudeep Holla

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.