All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: m.szyprowski@samsung.com (Marek Szyprowski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm: irq: l2c: do not print error in case of missing l2c from dtb
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:35:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5694BABF.3070200@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452582683.7773.102.camel@perches.com>

Hello,

On 2016-01-12 08:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 15:34 +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> In some architectures the L2 cache controller is integrated in the
>> processor's block itself and it doesn't use any external cache
>> controller. This means that an entry in the board's dtb related
>> to the l2c is not necessary.
>>
>> Distinguish between error codes and print just an information in
>> case of -ENODEV.
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> []
>> @@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
>>   			outer_cache.write_sec = machine_desc->l2c_write_sec;
>>   		ret = l2x0_of_init(machine_desc->l2c_aux_val,
>>   				   machine_desc->l2c_aux_mask);
>> -		if (ret)
>> +		if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> +			pr_info("no L2C controller entry found in the dtb\n");
> Perhaps this would be more consistent if it was
> 			pr_info("L2C: no controller entry found in the dtb\n");

Frankly I see no benefit of such message. It still might confuse users 
that there
is something wrong with your DT. When driver initialization fails with 
-ENODEV,
then no message is usually displayed.

>> +		else if (ret)
>>   			pr_err("L2C: failed to init: %d\n", ret);
>>   	}
>>   
>
>

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, tony@atomide.com, robh@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, olof@lixom.net, tomasz.figa@gmail.com,
	jiang.liu@linux.intel.com, yamada.masahiro@socionext.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k.kozlowski@samsung.com,
	andi@etezian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm: irq: l2c: do not print error in case of missing l2c from dtb
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:35:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5694BABF.3070200@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452582683.7773.102.camel@perches.com>

Hello,

On 2016-01-12 08:11, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 15:34 +0900, Andi Shyti wrote:
>> In some architectures the L2 cache controller is integrated in the
>> processor's block itself and it doesn't use any external cache
>> controller. This means that an entry in the board's dtb related
>> to the l2c is not necessary.
>>
>> Distinguish between error codes and print just an information in
>> case of -ENODEV.
> trivia:
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c b/arch/arm/kernel/irq.c
> []
>> @@ -95,7 +95,9 @@ void __init init_IRQ(void)
>>   			outer_cache.write_sec = machine_desc->l2c_write_sec;
>>   		ret = l2x0_of_init(machine_desc->l2c_aux_val,
>>   				   machine_desc->l2c_aux_mask);
>> -		if (ret)
>> +		if (ret == -ENODEV)
>> +			pr_info("no L2C controller entry found in the dtb\n");
> Perhaps this would be more consistent if it was
> 			pr_info("L2C: no controller entry found in the dtb\n");

Frankly I see no benefit of such message. It still might confuse users 
that there
is something wrong with your DT. When driver initialization fails with 
-ENODEV,
then no message is usually displayed.

>> +		else if (ret)
>>   			pr_err("L2C: failed to init: %d\n", ret);
>>   	}
>>   
>
>

Best regards
-- 
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-01-12  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-12  6:34 [PATCH] arm: irq: l2c: do not print error in case of missing l2c from dtb Andi Shyti
2016-01-12  6:34 ` Andi Shyti
2016-01-12  7:11 ` Joe Perches
2016-01-12  7:11   ` Joe Perches
2016-01-12  7:24   ` [PATCH v2] " Andi Shyti
2016-01-12  7:24     ` Andi Shyti
2016-01-12  8:28     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-12  8:28       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-12  8:35   ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2016-01-12  8:35     ` [PATCH] " Marek Szyprowski
2016-01-12 10:11     ` [PATCH v3] " Andi Shyti
2016-01-12 10:11       ` Andi Shyti
2016-01-12 23:55       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-12 23:55         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-01-20 18:02       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-01-20 18:02         ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5694BABF.3070200@samsung.com \
    --to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.