From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Mans Rullgard <mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen
<cyrille.pitchen-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
"Yang,
Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>,
<linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5694BEB2.4000603@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a écrit :
> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.
>
> This patch makes the method per device instead of per controller
> and fixes the selection on non-DT systems.
Sorry Mans, but it's still a NACK for me on this "mixed CS feature" (Cf.
my answer to the previous version).
Bye,
> With these changes,
> the chip-select method for each device is chosen according to the
> following priority:
>
> 1. GPIO from device tree
> 2. GPIO from platform data
> 3. Internal chip-select
>
> Tested on AVR32 ATSTK1000.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> Changes:
> - allow internal CS only hardware v2
> - retain seting of master->num_chipselect to 4 on hardware v2 if
> cs-gpios property is missing
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ struct atmel_spi {
>
> bool use_dma;
> bool use_pdc;
> - bool use_cs_gpios;
> /* dmaengine data */
> struct atmel_spi_dma dma;
>
> @@ -323,6 +322,7 @@ struct atmel_spi {
> struct atmel_spi_device {
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> u32 csr;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
> };
>
> #define BUFFER_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> } else {
> u32 cpol = (spi->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SPI_BIT(CPOL) : 0;
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios && spi->chip_select != 0)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio && spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
> }
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (low)" : "",
> mr);
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> spi_writel(as, CR, SPI_BIT(LASTXFER));
> else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) || spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active);
> @@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word;
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> int ret;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
>
> as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>
> @@ -1565,8 +1566,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BIT(CPOL);
> if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CPHA))
> csr |= SPI_BIT(NCPHA);
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
>
> /* DLYBS is mostly irrelevant since we manage chipselect using GPIOs.
> *
> @@ -1577,13 +1576,22 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBS, 0);
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT, 0);
>
> - /* chipselect must have been muxed as GPIO (e.g. in board setup) */
> npcs_pin = (unsigned long)spi->controller_data;
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> - else if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
> + if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
> + /* GPIO from DT */
> npcs_pin = spi->cs_gpio;
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (npcs_pin && gpio_is_valid(npcs_pin)) {
> + /* GPIO from platform data */
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as)) {
> + /* internal chip-select */
> + npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> + use_cs_gpio = false;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> asd = spi->controller_state;
> if (!asd) {
> @@ -1591,7 +1599,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (!asd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios) {
> + if (use_cs_gpio) {
> ret = gpio_request(npcs_pin, dev_name(&spi->dev));
> if (ret) {
> kfree(asd);
> @@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
> + asd->use_cs_gpio = use_cs_gpio;
> spi->controller_state = asd;
> } else {
> atmel_spi_lock(as);
> @@ -1612,6 +1621,8 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> atmel_spi_unlock(as);
> }
>
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> + csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
> asd->csr = csr;
>
> dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
> @@ -1807,12 +1818,9 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> atmel_get_caps(as);
>
> - as->use_cs_gpios = true;
> if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) &&
> - !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL)) {
> - as->use_cs_gpios = false;
> + !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL))
> master->num_chipselect = 4;
> - }
>
> as->use_dma = false;
> as->use_pdc = false;
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-spi" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5694BEB2.4000603@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com>
Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a ?crit :
> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.
>
> This patch makes the method per device instead of per controller
> and fixes the selection on non-DT systems.
Sorry Mans, but it's still a NACK for me on this "mixed CS feature" (Cf.
my answer to the previous version).
Bye,
> With these changes,
> the chip-select method for each device is chosen according to the
> following priority:
>
> 1. GPIO from device tree
> 2. GPIO from platform data
> 3. Internal chip-select
>
> Tested on AVR32 ATSTK1000.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> ---
> Changes:
> - allow internal CS only hardware v2
> - retain seting of master->num_chipselect to 4 on hardware v2 if
> cs-gpios property is missing
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ struct atmel_spi {
>
> bool use_dma;
> bool use_pdc;
> - bool use_cs_gpios;
> /* dmaengine data */
> struct atmel_spi_dma dma;
>
> @@ -323,6 +322,7 @@ struct atmel_spi {
> struct atmel_spi_device {
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> u32 csr;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
> };
>
> #define BUFFER_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> } else {
> u32 cpol = (spi->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SPI_BIT(CPOL) : 0;
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios && spi->chip_select != 0)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio && spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
> }
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (low)" : "",
> mr);
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> spi_writel(as, CR, SPI_BIT(LASTXFER));
> else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) || spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active);
> @@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word;
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> int ret;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
>
> as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>
> @@ -1565,8 +1566,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BIT(CPOL);
> if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CPHA))
> csr |= SPI_BIT(NCPHA);
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
>
> /* DLYBS is mostly irrelevant since we manage chipselect using GPIOs.
> *
> @@ -1577,13 +1576,22 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBS, 0);
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT, 0);
>
> - /* chipselect must have been muxed as GPIO (e.g. in board setup) */
> npcs_pin = (unsigned long)spi->controller_data;
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> - else if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
> + if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
> + /* GPIO from DT */
> npcs_pin = spi->cs_gpio;
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (npcs_pin && gpio_is_valid(npcs_pin)) {
> + /* GPIO from platform data */
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as)) {
> + /* internal chip-select */
> + npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> + use_cs_gpio = false;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> asd = spi->controller_state;
> if (!asd) {
> @@ -1591,7 +1599,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (!asd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios) {
> + if (use_cs_gpio) {
> ret = gpio_request(npcs_pin, dev_name(&spi->dev));
> if (ret) {
> kfree(asd);
> @@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
> + asd->use_cs_gpio = use_cs_gpio;
> spi->controller_state = asd;
> } else {
> atmel_spi_lock(as);
> @@ -1612,6 +1621,8 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> atmel_spi_unlock(as);
> }
>
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> + csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
> asd->csr = csr;
>
> dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
> @@ -1807,12 +1818,9 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> atmel_get_caps(as);
>
> - as->use_cs_gpios = true;
> if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) &&
> - !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL)) {
> - as->use_cs_gpios = false;
> + !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL))
> master->num_chipselect = 4;
> - }
>
> as->use_dma = false;
> as->use_pdc = false;
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>,
"Yang, Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:52:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5694BEB2.4000603@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans@mansr.com>
Le 11/01/2016 17:01, Mans Rullgard a écrit :
> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.
>
> This patch makes the method per device instead of per controller
> and fixes the selection on non-DT systems.
Sorry Mans, but it's still a NACK for me on this "mixed CS feature" (Cf.
my answer to the previous version).
Bye,
> With these changes,
> the chip-select method for each device is chosen according to the
> following priority:
>
> 1. GPIO from device tree
> 2. GPIO from platform data
> 3. Internal chip-select
>
> Tested on AVR32 ATSTK1000.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mans Rullgard <mans@mansr.com>
> ---
> Changes:
> - allow internal CS only hardware v2
> - retain seting of master->num_chipselect to 4 on hardware v2 if
> cs-gpios property is missing
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> index 08cbb3e43c76..d4a806e24060 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-atmel.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ struct atmel_spi {
>
> bool use_dma;
> bool use_pdc;
> - bool use_cs_gpios;
> /* dmaengine data */
> struct atmel_spi_dma dma;
>
> @@ -323,6 +322,7 @@ struct atmel_spi {
> struct atmel_spi_device {
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> u32 csr;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
> };
>
> #define BUFFER_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
> @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> } else {
> u32 cpol = (spi->mode & SPI_CPOL) ? SPI_BIT(CPOL) : 0;
> @@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static void cs_activate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
>
> mr = spi_readl(as, MR);
> mr = SPI_BFINS(PCS, ~(1 << spi->chip_select), mr);
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios && spi->chip_select != 0)
> + if (asd->use_cs_gpio && spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, active);
> spi_writel(as, MR, mr);
> }
> @@ -433,7 +433,7 @@ static void cs_deactivate(struct atmel_spi *as, struct spi_device *spi)
> asd->npcs_pin, active ? " (low)" : "",
> mr);
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> spi_writel(as, CR, SPI_BIT(LASTXFER));
> else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) || spi->chip_select != 0)
> gpio_set_value(asd->npcs_pin, !active);
> @@ -1539,6 +1539,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> unsigned int bits = spi->bits_per_word;
> unsigned int npcs_pin;
> int ret;
> + bool use_cs_gpio;
>
> as = spi_master_get_devdata(spi->master);
>
> @@ -1565,8 +1566,6 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BIT(CPOL);
> if (!(spi->mode & SPI_CPHA))
> csr |= SPI_BIT(NCPHA);
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
>
> /* DLYBS is mostly irrelevant since we manage chipselect using GPIOs.
> *
> @@ -1577,13 +1576,22 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBS, 0);
> csr |= SPI_BF(DLYBCT, 0);
>
> - /* chipselect must have been muxed as GPIO (e.g. in board setup) */
> npcs_pin = (unsigned long)spi->controller_data;
>
> - if (!as->use_cs_gpios)
> - npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> - else if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio))
> + if (gpio_is_valid(spi->cs_gpio)) {
> + /* GPIO from DT */
> npcs_pin = spi->cs_gpio;
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (npcs_pin && gpio_is_valid(npcs_pin)) {
> + /* GPIO from platform data */
> + use_cs_gpio = true;
> + } else if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as)) {
> + /* internal chip-select */
> + npcs_pin = spi->chip_select;
> + use_cs_gpio = false;
> + } else {
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
>
> asd = spi->controller_state;
> if (!asd) {
> @@ -1591,7 +1599,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> if (!asd)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - if (as->use_cs_gpios) {
> + if (use_cs_gpio) {
> ret = gpio_request(npcs_pin, dev_name(&spi->dev));
> if (ret) {
> kfree(asd);
> @@ -1603,6 +1611,7 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> }
>
> asd->npcs_pin = npcs_pin;
> + asd->use_cs_gpio = use_cs_gpio;
> spi->controller_state = asd;
> } else {
> atmel_spi_lock(as);
> @@ -1612,6 +1621,8 @@ static int atmel_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> atmel_spi_unlock(as);
> }
>
> + if (!asd->use_cs_gpio)
> + csr |= SPI_BIT(CSAAT);
> asd->csr = csr;
>
> dev_dbg(&spi->dev,
> @@ -1807,12 +1818,9 @@ static int atmel_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> atmel_get_caps(as);
>
> - as->use_cs_gpios = true;
> if (atmel_spi_is_v2(as) &&
> - !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL)) {
> - as->use_cs_gpios = false;
> + !of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node, "cs-gpios", NULL))
> master->num_chipselect = 4;
> - }
>
> as->use_dma = false;
> as->use_pdc = false;
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-12 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-11 16:01 [PATCH v2] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice Mans Rullgard
2016-01-11 16:01 ` Mans Rullgard
2016-01-11 16:01 ` Mans Rullgard
[not found] ` <1452528102-26458-1-git-send-email-mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-11 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-11 16:13 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-11 16:13 ` Mark Brown
[not found] ` <20160111161333.GK6588-GFdadSzt00ze9xe1eoZjHA@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-11 16:16 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-11 16:16 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-11 16:16 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-11 16:24 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-11 16:24 ` Mark Brown
2016-01-12 8:39 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2016-01-12 8:39 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2016-01-12 8:39 ` Cyrille Pitchen
[not found] ` <5694BBCD.8020700-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-01-12 8:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-12 8:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-12 8:51 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-12 8:52 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2016-01-12 8:52 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-01-12 8:52 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5694BEB2.4000603@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre-aife0yeh4naavxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=Wenyou.Yang-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=broonie-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=mans-2StjZFpD7GcAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.