All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: qemu-arm@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-arm] [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] target-arm: Implement MDCR_EL2.TDA and MDCR_EL2.TDA traps
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:31:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8C2EE.5090700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454690704-16233-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>

One of the MDCR_EL2's should be MDCR_EL3 instead.

On 05.02.2016 19:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Implement the debug register traps controlled by MDCR_EL2.TDA
> and MDCR_EL3.TDA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index 8c2adbc..064b415 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,24 @@ static CPAccessResult access_tdra(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>      return CP_ACCESS_OK;
>  }
>  
> +/* Check for traps to general debug registers, which are controlled
> + * by MDCR_EL2.TDA for EL2 and MDCR_EL3.TDA for EL3.
> + */
> +static CPAccessResult access_tda(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
> +                                  bool isread)
> +{
> +    int el = arm_current_el(env);
> +
> +    if (el < 2 && (env->cp15.mdcr_el2 & MDCR_TDA)
> +        && !arm_is_secure_below_el3(env)) {
> +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2;
> +    }
> +    if (el < 3 && (env->cp15.mdcr_el3 & MDCR_TDA)) {
> +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3;
> +    }
> +    return CP_ACCESS_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static void dacr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
>  {
>      ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env);
> @@ -3385,7 +3403,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el3_no_el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
>      { .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
> -      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
> +      .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
>      { .name = "HPFAR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
>        .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any,
> @@ -3804,7 +3823,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>      /* Monitor debug system control register; the 32-bit alias is DBGDSCRext. */
>      { .name = "MDSCR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 2,
> -      .access = PL1_RW,
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdscr_el1),
>        .resetvalue = 0 },
>      /* MDCCSR_EL0, aka DBGDSCRint. This is a read-only mirror of MDSCR_EL1.
> @@ -3813,7 +3832,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>      { .name = "MDCCSR_EL0", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 0,
>        .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS,
> -      .access = PL1_R,
> +      .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = access_tda,

From ARMv8 ARM rev. A.h: "If MDSCR_EL1.TDCC==1, EL0 read accesses to
this register are trapped to EL1." But it seems like we just don't
implement "Config-RO for EL0" so far. Maybe it's worth to implement a
separate function for checks controlled by MDSCR_EL1.TDCC?

>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdscr_el1), },
>      { .name = "OSLAR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 1, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
> @@ -3835,7 +3854,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>       */
>      { .name = "DBGVCR",
>        .cp = 14, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
> -      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };
>  
> @@ -4100,7 +4120,8 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>      int wrps, brps, ctx_cmps;
>      ARMCPRegInfo dbgdidr = {
>          .name = "DBGDIDR", .cp = 14, .crn = 0, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> -        .access = PL0_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = cpu->dbgdidr,
> +        .access = PL0_R, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +        .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = cpu->dbgdidr,

The same concern as above.

Kind regards,
Sergey

>      };
>  
>      /* Note that all these register fields hold "number of Xs minus 1". */
> @@ -4131,13 +4152,13 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
>              { .name = "DBGBVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 4,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgbvr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgbvr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
>              { .name = "DBGBCR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 5,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgbcr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgbcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
> @@ -4150,13 +4171,13 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
>              { .name = "DBGWVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 6,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgwvr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgwvr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
>              { .name = "DBGWCR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 7,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgwcr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgwcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergey Fedorov <serge.fdrv@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>,
	qemu-arm@nongnu.org, patches@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] target-arm: Implement MDCR_EL2.TDA and MDCR_EL2.TDA traps
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 19:31:42 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56B8C2EE.5090700@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454690704-16233-6-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org>

One of the MDCR_EL2's should be MDCR_EL3 instead.

On 05.02.2016 19:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Implement the debug register traps controlled by MDCR_EL2.TDA
> and MDCR_EL3.TDA.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  target-arm/helper.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c
> index 8c2adbc..064b415 100644
> --- a/target-arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target-arm/helper.c
> @@ -420,6 +420,24 @@ static CPAccessResult access_tdra(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
>      return CP_ACCESS_OK;
>  }
>  
> +/* Check for traps to general debug registers, which are controlled
> + * by MDCR_EL2.TDA for EL2 and MDCR_EL3.TDA for EL3.
> + */
> +static CPAccessResult access_tda(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri,
> +                                  bool isread)
> +{
> +    int el = arm_current_el(env);
> +
> +    if (el < 2 && (env->cp15.mdcr_el2 & MDCR_TDA)
> +        && !arm_is_secure_below_el3(env)) {
> +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL2;
> +    }
> +    if (el < 3 && (env->cp15.mdcr_el3 & MDCR_TDA)) {
> +        return CP_ACCESS_TRAP_EL3;
> +    }
> +    return CP_ACCESS_OK;
> +}
> +
>  static void dacr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
>  {
>      ARMCPU *cpu = arm_env_get_cpu(env);
> @@ -3385,7 +3403,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el3_no_el2_cp_reginfo[] = {
>        .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
>      { .name = "MDCR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 1, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 1,
> -      .access = PL2_RW, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
> +      .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = 0 },
>      { .name = "HPFAR_EL2", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .opc0 = 3, .opc1 = 4, .crn = 6, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
>        .access = PL2_RW, .accessfn = access_el3_aa32ns_aa64any,
> @@ -3804,7 +3823,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>      /* Monitor debug system control register; the 32-bit alias is DBGDSCRext. */
>      { .name = "MDSCR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 2, .opc2 = 2,
> -      .access = PL1_RW,
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdscr_el1),
>        .resetvalue = 0 },
>      /* MDCCSR_EL0, aka DBGDSCRint. This is a read-only mirror of MDSCR_EL1.
> @@ -3813,7 +3832,7 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>      { .name = "MDCCSR_EL0", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 1, .opc2 = 0,
>        .type = ARM_CP_ALIAS,
> -      .access = PL1_R,
> +      .access = PL1_R, .accessfn = access_tda,

>From ARMv8 ARM rev. A.h: "If MDSCR_EL1.TDCC==1, EL0 read accesses to
this register are trapped to EL1." But it seems like we just don't
implement "Config-RO for EL0" so far. Maybe it's worth to implement a
separate function for checks controlled by MDSCR_EL1.TDCC?

>        .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.mdscr_el1), },
>      { .name = "OSLAR_EL1", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>        .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 1, .crm = 0, .opc2 = 4,
> @@ -3835,7 +3854,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo debug_cp_reginfo[] = {
>       */
>      { .name = "DBGVCR",
>        .cp = 14, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = 7, .opc2 = 0,
> -      .access = PL1_RW, .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
> +      .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +      .type = ARM_CP_NOP },
>      REGINFO_SENTINEL
>  };
>  
> @@ -4100,7 +4120,8 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>      int wrps, brps, ctx_cmps;
>      ARMCPRegInfo dbgdidr = {
>          .name = "DBGDIDR", .cp = 14, .crn = 0, .crm = 0, .opc1 = 0, .opc2 = 0,
> -        .access = PL0_R, .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = cpu->dbgdidr,
> +        .access = PL0_R, .accessfn = access_tda,
> +        .type = ARM_CP_CONST, .resetvalue = cpu->dbgdidr,

The same concern as above.

Kind regards,
Sergey

>      };
>  
>      /* Note that all these register fields hold "number of Xs minus 1". */
> @@ -4131,13 +4152,13 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
>              { .name = "DBGBVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 4,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgbvr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgbvr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
>              { .name = "DBGBCR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 5,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgbcr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgbcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
> @@ -4150,13 +4171,13 @@ static void define_debug_regs(ARMCPU *cpu)
>          ARMCPRegInfo dbgregs[] = {
>              { .name = "DBGWVR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 6,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgwvr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgwvr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },
>              { .name = "DBGWCR", .state = ARM_CP_STATE_BOTH,
>                .cp = 14, .opc0 = 2, .opc1 = 0, .crn = 0, .crm = i, .opc2 = 7,
> -              .access = PL1_RW,
> +              .access = PL1_RW, .accessfn = access_tda,
>                .fieldoffset = offsetof(CPUARMState, cp15.dbgwcr[i]),
>                .writefn = dbgwcr_write, .raw_writefn = raw_write
>              },

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-05 16:44 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] target-arm: Implement various EL3 traps Peter Maydell
2016-02-05 16:44 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] target-arm: correct CNTFRQ access rights Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 15:25   ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 15:25     ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 15:30     ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 15:30       ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-05 16:45 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 2/6] target-arm: Fix handling of SCR.SMD Peter Maydell
2016-02-05 16:45   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 15:40   ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 15:40     ` [Qemu-devel] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-05 16:45 ` [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 3/6] target-arm: Implement MDCR_EL3.TDOSA and MDCR_EL2.TDOSA traps Peter Maydell
2016-02-05 16:45   ` [Qemu-devel] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 15:49   ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 15:49     ` [Qemu-devel] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-05 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] target-arm: Implement MDCR_EL2.TDRA traps Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 15:56   ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 15:56     ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-05 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] target-arm: Implement MDCR_EL2.TDA and MDCR_EL2.TDA traps Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 16:31   ` Sergey Fedorov [this message]
2016-02-08 16:31     ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 16:38     ` [Qemu-arm] " Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 16:38       ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 16:44       ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 16:44         ` Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-05 16:45 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] target-arm: Report correct syndrome for FPEXC32_EL2 traps Peter Maydell
2016-02-08 16:40   ` [Qemu-arm] " Sergey Fedorov
2016-02-08 16:40     ` Sergey Fedorov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56B8C2EE.5090700@gmail.com \
    --to=serge.fdrv@gmail.com \
    --cc=patches@linaro.org \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=qemu-arm@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.