From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1A1FE.3080403@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYzJ9Hy0sH6gK6RzpLE6juS4WfPjbt7nh43vR9YTuGZWA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
>> pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>> ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 9 ++++-----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>
> Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently
> of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?
>
Thanks for the follow up.
IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be
merged together(at-least for bisectibility)
> If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?
>
I think so.
> Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.
>
Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a
test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: sudeep.holla@arm.com (Sudeep Holla)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 10:01:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <56C1A1FE.3080403@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdYzJ9Hy0sH6gK6RzpLE6juS4WfPjbt7nh43vR9YTuGZWA@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Linus,
On 13/02/16 14:42, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:28 PM, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
>> pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class
>> pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>> ARM: OMAP2+: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag
>>
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/mux.c | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm34xx.c | 9 ++++-----
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm_common.c | 1 +
>> drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-single.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
>
> Are these patches orthogonal so I can merge the pinctrl patch independently
> of the OMAP patches if Tony ACKs this?
>
Thanks for the follow up.
IIUC they are dependent and remember Tony/Grygorii wanted them to be
merged together(at-least for bisectibility)
> If not: should it be merged by me or through ARM SoC/Tony?
>
I think so.
> Anyways waiting for maintainer feedback, but the above is good to know.
>
Grygorii was still not sure if this works and he couldn't give it a
test. He was traveling and may need more time to get back on this.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-15 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-01 18:28 [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` [PATCH 1/3] pinctrl: single: Use a separate lockdep class Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-03-08 11:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-03-08 11:32 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-03-11 16:04 ` Linus Walleij
2016-03-11 16:04 ` Linus Walleij
2016-02-01 18:28 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: single: remove misuse of IRQF_NO_SUSPEND flag Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: " Sudeep Holla
2016-02-01 18:28 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-04 13:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-04 13:14 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-02-04 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-04 13:34 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-13 14:42 ` [PATCH 0/3] OMAP/pinmux: " Linus Walleij
2016-02-13 14:42 ` Linus Walleij
2016-02-15 10:01 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2016-02-15 10:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2016-02-15 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-02-15 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-03-08 11:31 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-03-08 11:31 ` Grygorii Strashko
2016-03-08 17:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2016-03-08 17:09 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=56C1A1FE.3080403@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.