Re: [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic

All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:24:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD48C1.8010004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPfOpqU2fGsNNaB6n_iuq2r-8z3TCSsqkncPbvkK2344Tg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Javier, Krzysztof,

On 03/05/2016 05:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2016-03-05 5:20 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > This series have two trivial fixes for issues that I noticed while
>> > reading as a reference the driver's functions that parse the graph
>> > port and endpoints nodes.
>> >
>> > It was only compile tested because I don't have access to a Exynos4
>> > hardware to test the DT parsing, but the patches are very simple.
>
> Not directly related, but similar: my previous two patches for missing
> of_node_put [0] are unfortunately still waiting. Although I have
> Exynos4 boards, but I don't have infrastructure/scripts to test it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> [0] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32707/

Thanks for the patches, I've delegated them to myself and I'm going to
review/apply them this week.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: s.nawrocki@samsung.com (Sylwester Nawrocki)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:24:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD48C1.8010004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPfOpqU2fGsNNaB6n_iuq2r-8z3TCSsqkncPbvkK2344Tg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Javier, Krzysztof,

On 03/05/2016 05:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2016-03-05 5:20 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > This series have two trivial fixes for issues that I noticed while
>> > reading as a reference the driver's functions that parse the graph
>> > port and endpoints nodes.
>> >
>> > It was only compile tested because I don't have access to a Exynos4
>> > hardware to test the DT parsing, but the patches are very simple.
>
> Not directly related, but similar: my previous two patches for missing
> of_node_put [0] are unfortunately still waiting. Although I have
> Exynos4 boards, but I don't have infrastructure/scripts to test it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> [0] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32707/

Thanks for the patches, I've delegated them to myself and I'm going to
review/apply them this week.

--
Regards,
Sylwester

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)

From: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-media@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 10:24:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56DD48C1.8010004@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPfOpqU2fGsNNaB6n_iuq2r-8z3TCSsqkncPbvkK2344Tg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Javier, Krzysztof,

On 03/05/2016 05:35 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> 2016-03-05 5:20 GMT+09:00 Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@osg.samsung.com>:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > This series have two trivial fixes for issues that I noticed while
>> > reading as a reference the driver's functions that parse the graph
>> > port and endpoints nodes.
>> >
>> > It was only compile tested because I don't have access to a Exynos4
>> > hardware to test the DT parsing, but the patches are very simple.
>
> Not directly related, but similar: my previous two patches for missing
> of_node_put [0] are unfortunately still waiting. Although I have
> Exynos4 boards, but I don't have infrastructure/scripts to test it.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
> [0] https://patchwork.linuxtv.org/patch/32707/

Thanks for the patches, I've delegated them to myself and I'm going to
review/apply them this week.

--
Regards,
Sylwester

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-07  9:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-04 20:20 [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-04 20:20 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-04 20:20 ` [PATCH 1/2] [media] exynos4-is: Put node before s5pcsis_parse_dt() return error Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-04 20:20   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-04 20:20 ` [PATCH 2/2] [media] exynos4-is: FIMC port parse should fail if there's no endpoint Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-04 20:20   ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-11 13:03   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-11 13:03     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-11 14:55     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-11 14:55       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-22 20:19     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-22 20:19       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-05  4:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] [media] exynos4-is: Trivial fixes for DT port/endpoint parse logic Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-05  4:35   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2016-03-07  9:24   ` Sylwester Nawrocki [this message]
2016-03-07  9:24     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-07  9:24     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-07 14:30     ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-07 14:30       ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-11 13:09       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-11 13:09         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-03-11 14:39         ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2016-03-11 14:39           ` Javier Martinez Canillas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56DD48C1.8010004@samsung.com \
    --to=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=javier@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.