All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org,
	devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: gpiolib: Print error number if gpio hog failed
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:28:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E11B02.6080501@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E0584B.9050607-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>


On Wednesday 09 March 2016 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 08:32 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 08 March 2016 07:52 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:32:05PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 +++++----
>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> index bc788b9..7575ebb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> @@ -2621,15 +2621,16 @@ int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const
>>>> char *name,
>>>>       local_desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(chip, hwnum, name);
>>>>       if (IS_ERR(local_desc)) {
>>>> -        pr_err("requesting hog GPIO %s (chip %s, offset %d) 
>>>> failed\n",
>>>> -               name, chip->label, hwnum);
>>>> +        status = PTR_ERR(local_desc);
>>>> +        pr_err("requesting hog GPIO %s, chip %s, offset %d failed
>>>> %d\n",
>>>> +               name, chip->label, hwnum, status);
>>> I find this type of format hard to read. I prefer a semi-colon to
>>> separate the message from the failure reason (i.e. error code).
>>>
>>> Besides that I don't understand why you're dropping the parentheses
>>> around the "chip %s, offset %d", I found that easier on the eye.
>>
>> I did to accommodate the  3 extra character ( %d) for string format on
>> that line as it was already near to 80 column.
>> Just did not want to split in multiple lines.
>
> Note that strings shouldn't be split across lines since it makes it 
> harder to grep for them. This is one case where the 80-column limit 
> isn't strict, within reason.

OK, so not change the existing string, just add new  format.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	<pawel.moll@arm.com>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] gpio: gpiolib: Print error number if gpio hog failed
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2016 12:28:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56E11B02.6080501@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56E0584B.9050607@wwwdotorg.org>


On Wednesday 09 March 2016 10:37 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 08:32 AM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 08 March 2016 07:52 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:32:05PM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 9 +++++----
>>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> index bc788b9..7575ebb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
>>>> @@ -2621,15 +2621,16 @@ int gpiod_hog(struct gpio_desc *desc, const
>>>> char *name,
>>>>       local_desc = gpiochip_request_own_desc(chip, hwnum, name);
>>>>       if (IS_ERR(local_desc)) {
>>>> -        pr_err("requesting hog GPIO %s (chip %s, offset %d) 
>>>> failed\n",
>>>> -               name, chip->label, hwnum);
>>>> +        status = PTR_ERR(local_desc);
>>>> +        pr_err("requesting hog GPIO %s, chip %s, offset %d failed
>>>> %d\n",
>>>> +               name, chip->label, hwnum, status);
>>> I find this type of format hard to read. I prefer a semi-colon to
>>> separate the message from the failure reason (i.e. error code).
>>>
>>> Besides that I don't understand why you're dropping the parentheses
>>> around the "chip %s, offset %d", I found that easier on the eye.
>>
>> I did to accommodate the  3 extra character ( %d) for string format on
>> that line as it was already near to 80 column.
>> Just did not want to split in multiple lines.
>
> Note that strings shouldn't be split across lines since it makes it 
> harder to grep for them. This is one case where the 80-column limit 
> isn't strict, within reason.

OK, so not change the existing string, just add new  format.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-10  6:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-08 12:02 [PATCH 0/5] gpio: of: Add error handling and support for multiple gpio in gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] gpio: of: Scan available child node for gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 14:18   ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-08 14:18     ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-08 12:02 ` [PATCH 2/5] gpio: gpiolib: Print error number if gpio hog failed Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:27   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-03-08 12:27     ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2016-03-08 14:22   ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-08 14:22     ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-08 15:32     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 15:32       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-09 17:07       ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]         ` <56E0584B.9050607-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-10  6:58           ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2016-03-10  6:58             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02 ` [PATCH 3/5] gpio: of: Return error if gpio hog configuration failed Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 14:23   ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-08 14:23     ` Thierry Reding
2016-03-09 17:11   ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-10  7:02     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-10  7:02       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02 ` [PATCH 4/5] gpio: of: Add support to have multiple gpios in gpio-hog Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-09  6:28   ` Markus Pargmann
2016-03-09 13:20     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-09 13:20       ` Laxman Dewangan
     [not found]       ` <56E02335.6020901-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-09 17:17         ` Stephen Warren
2016-03-09 17:17           ` Stephen Warren
     [not found]           ` <56E05AA9.8000503-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-03-10  7:07             ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-10  7:07               ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-10 11:16               ` Markus Pargmann
2016-03-10 11:53                 ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-10 11:53                   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-17 15:46                   ` Rob Herring
2016-03-17 17:44                     ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-17 17:44                       ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02 ` [PATCH 5/5] gpio: DT: Rephrase property "gpios" of hog node to support multiple gpios Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-08 12:02   ` Laxman Dewangan
2016-03-09 17:18   ` Stephen Warren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56E11B02.6080501@nvidia.com \
    --to=ldewangan-ddmlm1+adcrqt0dzr+alfa@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=pawel.moll-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=swarren-3lzwWm7+Weoh9ZMKESR00Q@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=treding-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.