All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<hpa@zytor.com>, <tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>,
	<rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>, <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	<andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <luto@amacapital.net>,
	<jlee@suse.com>, <lguest@lists.ozlabs.org>, <glin@suse.com>,
	<david.vrabel@citrix.com>, <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 11/14] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with legacy device check
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:46:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57062C63.2010609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459987594-5434-12-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org>

On 07/04/16 01:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Since we are removing paravirt_enabled() replace it with a
> logical equivalent. Even though PNPBIOS is x86 specific we
> add an arch-specific type call, which can be implemented by
> any architecture to show how other legacy attribute devices
> can later be also checked for with other ACPI legacy attribute
> flags.
> 
> This implicates the first ACPI 5.2.9.3 IA-PC Boot Architecture
> ACPI_FADT_LEGACY_DEVICES flag device, and shows how to add more.
[...]
> +struct x86_legacy_devices {
> +	int pnpbios;
> +};

It's not clear why pnpbios needs a new structure and why this structure
of devices does not have the bit for the rtc device.

David

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez"
	<mcgrof-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
	bp-Gina5bIWoIWzQB+pC5nmwQ@public.gmane.org,
	hpa-YMNOUZJC4hwAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
	tglx-hfZtesqFncYOwBW4kG4KsQ@public.gmane.org,
	mingo-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	rusty-8n+1lVoiYb80n/F98K4Iww@public.gmane.org
Cc: xen-devel-GuqFBffKawuULHF6PoxzQEEOCMrvLtNR@public.gmane.org,
	matt-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org,
	andrew.cooper3-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	x86-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
	linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
	luto-kltTT9wpgjJwATOyAt5JVQ@public.gmane.org,
	jlee-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org,
	lguest-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org,
	glin-IBi9RG/b67k@public.gmane.org,
	david.vrabel-Sxgqhf6Nn4DQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	boris.ostrovsky-QHcLZuEGTsvQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
	andriy.shevchenko-VuQAYsv1563Yd54FQh9/CA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 11/14] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with legacy device check
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 10:46:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57062C63.2010609@citrix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459987594-5434-12-git-send-email-mcgrof-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>

On 07/04/16 01:06, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Since we are removing paravirt_enabled() replace it with a
> logical equivalent. Even though PNPBIOS is x86 specific we
> add an arch-specific type call, which can be implemented by
> any architecture to show how other legacy attribute devices
> can later be also checked for with other ACPI legacy attribute
> flags.
> 
> This implicates the first ACPI 5.2.9.3 IA-PC Boot Architecture
> ACPI_FADT_LEGACY_DEVICES flag device, and shows how to add more.
[...]
> +struct x86_legacy_devices {
> +	int pnpbios;
> +};

It's not clear why pnpbios needs a new structure and why this structure
of devices does not have the bit for the rtc device.

David
_______________________________________________
Lguest mailing list
Lguest@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/lguest

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07  9:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-07  0:06 [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 11:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-07 22:36     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 22:36       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:41   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07  9:41     ` David Vrabel
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:42   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07  9:42     ` David Vrabel
2016-04-13 23:08     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 12:55   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 12:55     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08  0:32     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  5:18       ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  6:29         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  6:29           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  6:38           ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  6:38             ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  6:56             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  6:56               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  7:13               ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  7:13                 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  7:36                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  7:36                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  7:59                   ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08  7:59                     ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 12:37                     ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 12:37                       ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 18:45                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 18:45                         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 12:25           ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 12:25             ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] x86, ACPI: move ACPI_FADT_NO_CMOS_RTC check to ACPI boot code Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] x86/init: use a platform legacy quirk for ebda Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:44   ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07  9:44     ` David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:07     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] tools/lguest: force disable tboot and apm Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-11  3:32   ` Rusty Russell
2016-04-11  3:32     ` Rusty Russell
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:08   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 22:31     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] x86/cpu/intel: remove not needed paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with legacy device check Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  9:46   ` David Vrabel [this message]
2016-04-07  9:46     ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:42     ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] x86, ACPI: parse ACPI_FADT_LEGACY_DEVICES Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07  0:06 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] x86/paravirt: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:24 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Juergen Gross
2016-04-07 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08  1:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 10:23   ` Borislav Petkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57062C63.2010609@citrix.com \
    --to=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=glin@suse.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jlee@suse.com \
    --cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.