From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Joey Lee <jlee@suse.com>, Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
kozerkov@paral
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:37:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707A618.7040608@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570764F8.6020902@suse.com>
On 04/08/2016 03:59 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/04/16 09:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/04/16 08:56, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay. Another idea (not sure whether this is really a good one):
>>>>
>>>> Add X86_SUBARCH_XEN_DOM0. As hardware_subarch is 32 bits wide I don't
>>>> think the number of subarchs is a scarce resource. :-)
>> This would mean bumping the x86 boot protocol, we shouldn't take that
>> lightly, but given that in this case the new subarch would really only
>> be set by the kernel (or future loaders for perhaps HVMLite) I'd think
>> this is not such an intrusive alternative.
> I think adding an own subarch for dom0 isn't that bad. It really is
> different from domU as dom0 has per default access to the real hardware
> (or at least to most of it).
Can we do this (overwrite quirks) in x86_init_ops.arch_setup? I'd really
like to avoid adding a what essentially is a sub-subarch.
-boris
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
"xen-devel@lists.xensource.com" <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
lguest@lists.ozlabs.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Joey Lee <jlee@suse.com>, Gary Lin <glin@suse.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
"Moore, Robert" <robert.moore@intel.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
kozerkov@parallels.com, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 08:37:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5707A618.7040608@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <570764F8.6020902@suse.com>
On 04/08/2016 03:59 AM, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 08/04/16 09:36, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 8, 2016 at 12:13 AM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>> On 08/04/16 08:56, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:38 PM, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Okay. Another idea (not sure whether this is really a good one):
>>>>
>>>> Add X86_SUBARCH_XEN_DOM0. As hardware_subarch is 32 bits wide I don't
>>>> think the number of subarchs is a scarce resource. :-)
>> This would mean bumping the x86 boot protocol, we shouldn't take that
>> lightly, but given that in this case the new subarch would really only
>> be set by the kernel (or future loaders for perhaps HVMLite) I'd think
>> this is not such an intrusive alternative.
> I think adding an own subarch for dom0 isn't that bad. It really is
> different from domU as dom0 has per default access to the real hardware
> (or at least to most of it).
Can we do this (overwrite quirks) in x86_init_ops.arch_setup? I'd really
like to avoid adding a what essentially is a sub-subarch.
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-07 0:06 [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 01/14] x86/boot: enumerate documentation for the x86 hardware_subarch Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-04-07 22:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 22:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 02/14] x86/xen: use X86_SUBARCH_XEN for PV guest boots Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 9:41 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 9:41 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 03/14] tools/lguest: make lguest launcher use X86_SUBARCH_LGUEST explicitly Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 04/14] x86/rtc: replace paravirt rtc check with platform legacy quirk Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 9:42 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 9:42 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-13 23:08 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 12:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 12:55 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 0:32 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 5:18 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 6:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 6:29 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 6:38 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 6:38 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 6:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 6:56 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 7:13 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 7:13 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 7:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 7:36 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 7:59 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 7:59 ` Juergen Gross
2016-04-08 12:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2016-04-08 12:37 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 18:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 18:45 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 12:25 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-08 12:25 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 05/14] x86, ACPI: move ACPI_FADT_NO_CMOS_RTC check to ACPI boot code Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 06/14] x86/init: use a platform legacy quirk for ebda Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 9:44 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 9:44 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:07 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 07/14] tools/lguest: force disable tboot and apm Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-11 3:32 ` Rusty Russell
2016-04-11 3:32 ` Rusty Russell
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 08/14] apm32: remove paravirt_enabled() use Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:08 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2016-04-07 22:31 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 09/14] x86/tboot: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 10/14] x86/cpu/intel: remove not needed paravirt_enabled() for f00f work around Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 11/14] pnpbios: replace paravirt_enabled() check with legacy device check Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 9:46 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2016-04-07 9:46 ` David Vrabel
2016-04-07 21:42 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 12/14] x86, ACPI: parse ACPI_FADT_LEGACY_DEVICES Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 0:06 ` [PATCH v4 14/14] x86/paravirt: remove paravirt_enabled() Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-07 13:24 ` [Xen-devel] [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Juergen Gross
2016-04-07 21:31 ` [PATCH v4 13/14] x86/init: rename ebda code file Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 1:14 ` [PATCH v4 00/14] x86: remove paravirt_enabled Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-04-08 10:23 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5707A618.7040608@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
--cc=glin@suse.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jlee@suse.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=kozerkov@paral \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=lguest@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.