* Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable [not found] <573D5CF5.5050507@kyup.com> @ 2016-05-19 15:00 ` Nikolay Borisov 2016-05-19 15:33 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-19 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>> Hello Greg, >>>> >>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. >>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : >>>> >>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: >>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration >>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here >>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory >>>> >>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: >>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa >>>> >>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from >>>> that tree is useless? >>> >>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? >> >> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following >> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 >> >> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly >> recently. > > So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer > release? Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. > > I'll queue it up for the next round of patches, but it seems odd that no > one has reported this before, so trying to figure out why... > > thanks, > > greg k-h > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable 2016-05-19 15:00 ` Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-19 15:33 ` Greg KH 2016-05-20 6:19 ` Nikolay Borisov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-05-19 15:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikolay Borisov; +Cc: stable On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] > > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>> Hello Greg, > >>>> > >>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. > >>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : > >>>> > >>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors > >>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: > >>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration > >>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here > >>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory > >>>> > >>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: > >>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa > >>>> > >>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from > >>>> that tree is useless? > >>> > >>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? > >> > >> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following > >> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 > >> > >> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly > >> recently. > > > > So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer > > release? > > Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it > did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry, if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0 also works. Does it? We need some help narrowing this down if you want to see it resolved. thanks, greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable 2016-05-19 15:33 ` Greg KH @ 2016-05-20 6:19 ` Nikolay Borisov 2016-05-20 6:28 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-20 6:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable On 05/19/2016 06:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] >> >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>>>> Hello Greg, >>>>>> >>>>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. >>>>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : >>>>>> >>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >>>>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: >>>>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration >>>>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here >>>>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory >>>>>> >>>>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa >>>>>> >>>>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from >>>>>> that tree is useless? >>>>> >>>>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? >>>> >>>> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following >>>> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 >>>> >>>> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly >>>> recently. >>> >>> So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer >>> release? >> >> Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it >> did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. > > That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry, > if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0 > also works. Does it? Just tested, so 4.4.0 is broken, 4.6 works. > > We need some help narrowing this down if you want to see it resolved. > > thanks, > > greg k-h > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable 2016-05-20 6:19 ` Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-20 6:28 ` Greg KH 2016-05-20 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-05-20 6:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikolay Borisov; +Cc: stable On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:19:04AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 05/19/2016 06:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >> [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] > >> > >>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>>>> Hello Greg, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. > >>>>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : > >>>>>> > >>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors > >>>>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: > >>>>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration > >>>>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here > >>>>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: > >>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from > >>>>>> that tree is useless? > >>>>> > >>>>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? > >>>> > >>>> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following > >>>> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 > >>>> > >>>> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly > >>>> recently. > >>> > >>> So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer > >>> release? > >> > >> Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it > >> did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. > > > > That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry, > > if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0 > > also works. Does it? > > Just tested, so 4.4.0 is broken, 4.6 works. Great, can you use 'git bisect' to find the patch that fixes it? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable 2016-05-20 6:28 ` Greg KH @ 2016-05-20 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov 2016-05-20 17:33 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-20 6:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Greg KH; +Cc: stable On 05/20/2016 09:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:19:04AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >> >> >> On 05/19/2016 06:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>> [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] >>>> >>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: >>>>>>>> Hello Greg, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. >>>>>>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors >>>>>>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: >>>>>>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration >>>>>>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here >>>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: >>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from >>>>>>>> that tree is useless? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? >>>>>> >>>>>> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following >>>>>> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 >>>>>> >>>>>> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly >>>>>> recently. >>>>> >>>>> So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer >>>>> release? >>>> >>>> Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it >>>> did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. >>> >>> That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry, >>> if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0 >>> also works. Does it? >> >> Just tested, so 4.4.0 is broken, 4.6 works. > > Great, can you use 'git bisect' to find the patch that fixes it? Well, I have given you a link to this patch in my first email. I can't understand what the problem here is ? > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable 2016-05-20 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov @ 2016-05-20 17:33 ` Greg KH 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Greg KH @ 2016-05-20 17:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Nikolay Borisov; +Cc: stable On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:34:20AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 05/20/2016 09:28 AM, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 09:19:04AM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 05/19/2016 06:33 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 06:00:30PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>> [Resending since I did mistyped the stable mailing list address] > >>>> > >>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 06:13:43PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 05/18/2016 06:10 PM, Greg KH wrote: > >>>>>>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 04:02:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > >>>>>>>> Hello Greg, > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Turns out building perf is broken in the 4.4 kernel tree on centos6. > >>>>>>>> Executing make in toosl/perf results in : > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors > >>>>>>>> tests/llvm.c: In function ‘test_llvm__fetch_bpf_obj’: > >>>>>>>> tests/llvm.c:53: error: declaration of ‘index’ shadows a global declaration > >>>>>>>> /usr/include/string.h:489: error: shadowed declaration is here > >>>>>>>> mv: cannot stat `tests/.llvm.o.tmp': No such file or directory > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> This can be fixed by applying the following commit: > >>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=916d4092a1d2d7bb50630497be71ee4c4c2807fa > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Would it be possible to apply it for 4.4.12 otherwise using perf from > >>>>>>>> that tree is useless? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Is this something that recently broke? Or has it always been an issue? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> According to the Fixes tags in the commit this broke in the following > >>>>>> series: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=144681782820358 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Which was applied in November 6. 2015. So I'd say it's been fairly > >>>>>> recently. > >>>>> > >>>>> So it's always been broken in 4.4? Or did I break it in a newer > >>>>> release? > >>>> > >>>> Before that I was on 3.12 stable and everything worked, so I guess it > >>>> did break in the release which included the aforementioned patches. > >>> > >>> That's not what I need to know. Is 4.4.0 broken? If not, then I worry, > >>> if so, then there's not really anything interesting here. Unless 4.6.0 > >>> also works. Does it? > >> > >> Just tested, so 4.4.0 is broken, 4.6 works. > > > > Great, can you use 'git bisect' to find the patch that fixes it? > > Well, I have given you a link to this patch in my first email. I can't > understand what the problem here is ? Doh, sorry, you are correct, I got confused here, thanks for being persistent... greg k-h ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-05-20 17:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <573D5CF5.5050507@kyup.com>
2016-05-19 15:00 ` Fwd: Re: Inclusion for 916d4092a1d2d7b in 4.4 stable Nikolay Borisov
2016-05-19 15:33 ` Greg KH
2016-05-20 6:19 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-05-20 6:28 ` Greg KH
2016-05-20 6:34 ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-05-20 17:33 ` Greg KH
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.