From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Ravikumar Kattekola <rk@ti.com>,
paul@pwsan.com, tony@atomide.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm: dra7: Add i2c6 instance hwmod and dt entries
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:47:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57468E0D.2060504@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5745CE4E.3020903@ti.com>
On 25/05/16 19:09, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 07:53 AM, Ravikumar Kattekola wrote:
>> DRA72x devices have a sixth i2c ocntroller instance.
>> Following patches add the required hwmod structure and
>> device tree nodes.
>>
>> Reference doc: DRA72x TRM [ SPRUHP2Q ]
>>
>> Tested on :
>> DRA72x Rev B EVM
>>
>> Ravikumar Kattekola (2):
>> arm: dra7: Add hwmod entry for i2c6
>> dts: dra7: Add device tree node for i2c6
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
> NAK. reasoning:
> a) i2c6 is a custom IP integration with completely non-standard
> dependencies with cross device dependencies for pretty much a specific
> usecase -> usage is pretty much limited for generic support - the
> decision is NOT to support this instance in Linux kernel - internal
> discussion forwarded to developer.
> b) the patches themselves are wrong -> it applies to DRA72x not
> generic DRA7x platform
> c) patches themselves are in the wrong format (wrong subject line etc).
> d) patches don't handle the SoC internal device dependencies either ->
> in short will not function in a generic solution for all variations of
> platforms.
>
Yes please drop this, attempting to support it in upstream is just going
to cause unnecessary pain.
-Tero
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] arm: dra7: Add i2c6 instance hwmod and dt entries
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:47:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57468E0D.2060504@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5745CE4E.3020903@ti.com>
On 25/05/16 19:09, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 07:53 AM, Ravikumar Kattekola wrote:
>> DRA72x devices have a sixth i2c ocntroller instance.
>> Following patches add the required hwmod structure and
>> device tree nodes.
>>
>> Reference doc: DRA72x TRM [ SPRUHP2Q ]
>>
>> Tested on :
>> DRA72x Rev B EVM
>>
>> Ravikumar Kattekola (2):
>> arm: dra7: Add hwmod entry for i2c6
>> dts: dra7: Add device tree node for i2c6
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
> NAK. reasoning:
> a) i2c6 is a custom IP integration with completely non-standard
> dependencies with cross device dependencies for pretty much a specific
> usecase -> usage is pretty much limited for generic support - the
> decision is NOT to support this instance in Linux kernel - internal
> discussion forwarded to developer.
> b) the patches themselves are wrong -> it applies to DRA72x not
> generic DRA7x platform
> c) patches themselves are in the wrong format (wrong subject line etc).
> d) patches don't handle the SoC internal device dependencies either ->
> in short will not function in a generic solution for all variations of
> platforms.
>
Yes please drop this, attempting to support it in upstream is just going
to cause unnecessary pain.
-Tero
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, Ravikumar Kattekola <rk@ti.com>,
<paul@pwsan.com>, <tony@atomide.com>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
<robh+dt@kernel.org>, <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
<mark.rutland@arm.com>, <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
<galak@codeaurora.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm: dra7: Add i2c6 instance hwmod and dt entries
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 08:47:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57468E0D.2060504@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5745CE4E.3020903@ti.com>
On 25/05/16 19:09, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 05/25/2016 07:53 AM, Ravikumar Kattekola wrote:
>> DRA72x devices have a sixth i2c ocntroller instance.
>> Following patches add the required hwmod structure and
>> device tree nodes.
>>
>> Reference doc: DRA72x TRM [ SPRUHP2Q ]
>>
>> Tested on :
>> DRA72x Rev B EVM
>>
>> Ravikumar Kattekola (2):
>> arm: dra7: Add hwmod entry for i2c6
>> dts: dra7: Add device tree node for i2c6
>>
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/dra7.dtsi | 11 +++++++++++
>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap_hwmod_7xx_data.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+)
>>
> NAK. reasoning:
> a) i2c6 is a custom IP integration with completely non-standard
> dependencies with cross device dependencies for pretty much a specific
> usecase -> usage is pretty much limited for generic support - the
> decision is NOT to support this instance in Linux kernel - internal
> discussion forwarded to developer.
> b) the patches themselves are wrong -> it applies to DRA72x not
> generic DRA7x platform
> c) patches themselves are in the wrong format (wrong subject line etc).
> d) patches don't handle the SoC internal device dependencies either ->
> in short will not function in a generic solution for all variations of
> platforms.
>
Yes please drop this, attempting to support it in upstream is just going
to cause unnecessary pain.
-Tero
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-26 5:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-25 12:53 [PATCH 0/2] arm: dra7: Add i2c6 instance hwmod and dt entries Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm: dra7: Add hwmod entry for i2c6 Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 16:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:10 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:10 ` Nishanth Menon
[not found] ` <20160525125341.10044-2-rk-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>
2016-05-26 3:55 ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-05-26 3:55 ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-05-26 3:55 ` Lokesh Vutla
2016-05-25 12:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] dts: dra7: Add device tree node " Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 12:53 ` Ravikumar Kattekola
2016-05-25 16:11 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:11 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:11 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm: dra7: Add i2c6 instance hwmod and dt entries Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-25 16:09 ` Nishanth Menon
2016-05-26 5:47 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2016-05-26 5:47 ` Tero Kristo
2016-05-26 5:47 ` Tero Kristo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57468E0D.2060504@ti.com \
--to=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=rk@ti.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.