From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi-ImC7XgPzLAfvYQKSrp0J2Q@public.gmane.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee
<sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Doug Ledford <dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Hal Rosenstock
<hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/core: remove dead code
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756C0E0.7090303@lightbits.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465247706-4418-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On 07/06/16 00:15, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> prot_sg_cnt has been assigned with the value of ret which we have
> already checked to be non-zero so prot_sg_cnt can never be zero at this
> point of the code and hence the else part can never execute.
> And since we know prot_sg_cnt is non zero there is no use for the
> if condition also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee-4yDnlxn2s6sWdaTGBSpHTA@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> index 1eb9b12..a829a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> @@ -386,21 +386,17 @@ int rdma_rw_ctx_signature_init(struct rdma_rw_ctx *ctx, struct ib_qp *qp,
> count += ret;
> prev_wr = &ctx->sig->data.reg_wr.wr;
>
> - if (prot_sg_cnt) {
> - ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> - prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> - count += ret;
> + ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> + prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> + count += ret;
>
> - if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> - else
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - } else {
> - ctx->sig->prot.mr = NULL;
> - }
> + if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> + else
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> + prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
>
> ctx->sig->sig_mr = ib_mr_pool_get(qp, &qp->sig_mrs);
> if (!ctx->sig->sig_mr) {
>
Actually it looks like the data-integrity insert/strip operation
(where protection sg list does not exist) is broken.
It looks that the protection scatterlist should be done only if
prot_sg_count was provided...
I don't have access to mlx5 devices at the moment (still waiting
to get some...)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@lightbits.io>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Sean Hefty <sean.hefty@intel.com>,
Hal Rosenstock <hal.rosenstock@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
leon@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] IB/core: remove dead code
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 15:41:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5756C0E0.7090303@lightbits.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465247706-4418-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
On 07/06/16 00:15, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> prot_sg_cnt has been assigned with the value of ret which we have
> already checked to be non-zero so prot_sg_cnt can never be zero at this
> point of the code and hence the else part can never execute.
> And since we know prot_sg_cnt is non zero there is no use for the
> if condition also.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> index 1eb9b12..a829a14 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rw.c
> @@ -386,21 +386,17 @@ int rdma_rw_ctx_signature_init(struct rdma_rw_ctx *ctx, struct ib_qp *qp,
> count += ret;
> prev_wr = &ctx->sig->data.reg_wr.wr;
>
> - if (prot_sg_cnt) {
> - ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> - prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> - count += ret;
> + ret = rdma_rw_init_one_mr(qp, port_num, &ctx->sig->prot,
> + prot_sg, prot_sg_cnt, 0);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto out_destroy_data_mr;
> + count += ret;
>
> - if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> - else
> - prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> - } else {
> - ctx->sig->prot.mr = NULL;
> - }
> + if (ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr.next)
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.inv_wr;
> + else
> + prev_wr->next = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
> + prev_wr = &ctx->sig->prot.reg_wr.wr;
>
> ctx->sig->sig_mr = ib_mr_pool_get(qp, &qp->sig_mrs);
> if (!ctx->sig->sig_mr) {
>
Actually it looks like the data-integrity insert/strip operation
(where protection sg list does not exist) is broken.
It looks that the protection scatterlist should be done only if
prot_sg_count was provided...
I don't have access to mlx5 devices at the moment (still waiting
to get some...)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-07 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-06 21:15 [PATCH v2] IB/core: remove dead code Sudip Mukherjee
[not found] ` <1465247706-4418-1-git-send-email-sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 7:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-06-07 7:33 ` Leon Romanovsky
2016-06-07 12:41 ` Sagi Grimberg [this message]
2016-06-07 12:41 ` Sagi Grimberg
[not found] ` <5756C0E0.7090303-ImC7XgPzLAfvYQKSrp0J2Q@public.gmane.org>
2016-06-07 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-07 12:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-06-07 13:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5756C0E0.7090303@lightbits.io \
--to=sagi-imc7xgpzlafvyqksrp0j2q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=hal.rosenstock-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=leon-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sean.hefty-ral2JQCrhuEAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=sudipm.mukherjee-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.