From: alexandre.torgue@st.com (Alexandre Torgue)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALszF6AP52EAN68qH8Pup9uxqTnhoT8wigiKaZzgHns3m+NCgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David,
On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP.
>>>>>>> This series:
>>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already
>>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip.
>>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits:
>>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much
>>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading
>>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot.
>>>
>>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it.
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree?
>>>
>>
>> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches
>> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes
>> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the
>> merge window.
>>
>> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with
>> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need
>> to land them all in v4.8.
>
> Ok, this is good for me.
> No problem to wait for v4.8.
> I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once
> v4.7-rc1 is out.
According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches
+ bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ?
Do you need I resend them separately ?
Thanks in advance
Alex
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@gmail.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALszF6AP52EAN68qH8Pup9uxqTnhoT8wigiKaZzgHns3m+NCgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David,
On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP.
>>>>>>> This series:
>>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already
>>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip.
>>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits:
>>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much
>>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading
>>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot.
>>>
>>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it.
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree?
>>>
>>
>> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches
>> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes
>> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the
>> merge window.
>>
>> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with
>> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need
>> to land them all in v4.8.
>
> Ok, this is good for me.
> No problem to wait for v4.8.
> I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once
> v4.7-rc1 is out.
According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches
+ bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ?
Do you need I resend them separately ?
Thanks in advance
Alex
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@gmail.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Joachim Eastwood <manabian@gmail.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429
Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 17:37:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57753CB1.3010800@st.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALszF6AP52EAN68qH8Pup9uxqTnhoT8wigiKaZzgHns3m+NCgQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi David,
On 05/18/2016 11:49 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2016-05-18 11:31 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>:
>> On Wednesday 18 May 2016 09:48:53 Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> 2016-05-17 18:25 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>> From: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
>>>> Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 11:20:16 +0200
>>>>
>>>>> Hi David,
>>>>>
>>>>> 2016-05-09 21:06 GMT+02:00 David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>:
>>>>>> From: Alexandre TORGUE <alexandre.torgue@gmail.com>
>>>>>> Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 12:31:33 +0200
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> STM32F429 Chip embeds a Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP.
>>>>>>> This series:
>>>>>>> -enhance current stmmac driver to control it (code already
>>>>>>> available) and adds basic glue for STM32F429 chip.
>>>>>>> -Enable basic Net config in kernel.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I assume this will go via the ARM tree, for the networking bits:
>>>>> I would expect patches 1, 2 & 3 to got via your tree, to avoid conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> I don't think putting them all via the ARM tree is going to create much
>>>> in the way of conflicts, and right now during the merge window offloading
>>>> that work from me would really help my backlog a lot.
>>>
>>> Ok, I understand this is not the best time to pick it.
>>>
>>> Arnd, Olof & Kevin, would you accept to pick the series in your tree?
>>>
>>
>> It's too late for v4.7 for us too, please pick up the arch/arm patches
>> in your normal stm32 tree and send them to us along with any other changes
>> you may have, and resend the driver by itself to netdev time after the
>> merge window.
>>
>> The binding document can go either way, with the dts changes or with
>> the driver. I see no dependencies between the patches, so we just need
>> to land them all in v4.8.
>
> Ok, this is good for me.
> No problem to wait for v4.8.
> I will take the arch/arm patches, and David the drivers/net/ ones once
> v4.7-rc1 is out.
According to this old discussion, could you please take driver patches
+ bindings one (patch 1/2/3) in your net-next tree ?
Do you need I resend them separately ?
Thanks in advance
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-30 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-09 10:31 [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429 Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 1/6] net: ethernet: dwmac: add Ethernet glue logic for stm32 chip Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 2/6] Documentation: Bindings: Add STM32 DWMAC glue Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 3/6] net: ethernet: stmmac: add support of Synopsys 3.50a MAC IP Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 4/6] ARM: STM32: Enable Ethernet in stm32_defconfig Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 5/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: Align Ethernet node with new bindings properties Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 6/6] ARM: dts: stm32f429: Update Ethernet node on Eval board Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 10:31 ` Alexandre TORGUE
2016-05-09 19:06 ` [RESEND PATCH v6 0/6] Add Ethernet support on STM32F429 David Miller
2016-05-09 19:06 ` David Miller
2016-05-17 9:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-17 9:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-17 9:20 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-17 16:25 ` David Miller
2016-05-17 16:25 ` David Miller
2016-05-17 16:25 ` David Miller
2016-05-18 7:48 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-18 7:48 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-18 9:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-18 9:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-18 9:31 ` Arnd Bergmann
2016-05-18 9:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-18 9:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-05-18 9:49 ` Maxime Coquelin
2016-06-30 15:37 ` Alexandre Torgue [this message]
2016-06-30 15:37 ` Alexandre Torgue
2016-06-30 15:37 ` Alexandre Torgue
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57753CB1.3010800@st.com \
--to=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.