releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Sage,

Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96

Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[wido]

> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Hi Sage,
> 
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> 
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> 

I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725

Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.

Wido

> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

Hi,

Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:

"jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867

"jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869

Alexandre

----- Mail original -----
De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven: 
> 
> Hi Sage, 
> 
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518 
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 
> 
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ? 
> 

I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while. 

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725 

Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up. 

Wido 

> Cheers 
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i 

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Alexandre,

On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd:
> 
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867

I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released.

> 
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled"
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869

This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting.

Cheers

> 
> Alexandre
> 
> ----- Mail original -----
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
> 
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven: 
>>
>> Hi Sage, 
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518 
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ? 
>>
> 
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while. 
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725 
> 
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up. 
> 
> Wido 
> 
>> Cheers 
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 
>>
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i 
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

>>If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting. 

Ok, thanks ! I'll try to do it Monday.

----- Mail original -----
De: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
À: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:00:44
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

Hi Alexandre, 

On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: 
> Hi, 
> 
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd: 
> 
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map" 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867 

I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released. 

> 
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled" 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869 

This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting. 

Cheers 

> 
> Alexandre 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com> 
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org> 
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> 
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05 
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? 
> 
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven: 
>> 
>> Hi Sage, 
>> 
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518 
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 
>> 
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ? 
>> 
> 
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while. 
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725 
> 
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up. 
> 
> Wido 
> 
>> Cheers 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 
>> 
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i 
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Alexandre DERUMIER]

> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled" 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869 

>>This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting. 

Ok, I have tested the backport, and it's working fine now ! Thanks !


----- Mail original -----
De: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>
À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
Cc: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com>, "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com>
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:09:36
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

>>If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting. 

Ok, thanks ! I'll try to do it Monday. 

----- Mail original ----- 
De: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org> 
À: "aderumier" <aderumier@odiso.com>, "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com> 
Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> 
Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 13:00:44 
Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? 

Hi Alexandre, 

On 19/08/2016 12:37, Alexandre DERUMIER wrote: 
> Hi, 
> 
> Personnaly I'm waiting for theses backports for librbd: 
> 
> "jewel: mkfs.xfs slow performance with discards and object map" 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16867 

I think it will be merged before 10.2.3 is released. 

> 
> "jewel: Discard hangs when 'rbd_skip_partial_discard' is enabled" 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16869 

This one was conflicting and did not get tested yet. I rebased it a minute ago and it will hopefully compile now. If you can run a rbd job that is relevant it will speedup backporting. 

Cheers 

> 
> Alexandre 
> 
> ----- Mail original ----- 
> De: "Wido den Hollander" <wido@42on.com> 
> À: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org> 
> Cc: "Sage Weil" <sweil@redhat.com>, "ceph-devel" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "Abhishek Varshney" <abhishek.varshney@flipkart.com> 
> Envoyé: Vendredi 19 Août 2016 09:18:05 
> Objet: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ? 
> 
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven: 
>> 
>> Hi Sage, 
>> 
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518 
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96 
>> 
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ? 
>> 
> 
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while. 
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725 
> 
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up. 
> 
> Wido 
> 
>> Cheers 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 
>> 
>> -- 
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 
> N�����r��y���b�X��ǧv�^�)޺{.n�+���z�]z���{ay�ʇڙ�,j��f���h���z��w������j:+v���w�j�m��������zZ+�����ݢj"��!�i 
> 
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre 

-- 
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in 
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org 
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html 

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Wido,

Almost all pull requests requested for 10.2.3 are merged except this one. There is a backport at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10804 . It will need testing and it may take some time. 

@Kefu Is there a job we can run to verify it does the right thing in jewel ?

Cheers

On 19/08/2016 09:18, wido@42on.com wrote:
> 
> 
>> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het volgende geschreven:
>>
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
> 
> I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4 can take a while.
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 / https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
> 
> Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are not coming up.
> 
> Wido
> 
>> Cheers
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Kefu Chai]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Loic Dachary" <loic@dachary.org>
> To: wido@42on.com, "Kefu Chai" <kchai@redhat.com>
> Cc: "Ceph Development" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>
> Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:27:52 AM
> Subject: Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?
> 
> 
> Hi Wido,
> 
> Almost all pull requests requested for 10.2.3 are merged except this one.
> There is a backport at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10804 . It will
> need testing and it may take some time.
> 
> @Kefu Is there a job we can run to verify it does the right thing in jewel ?
> 

we do exercise "ceph osd pause" in workunit/cephtool[1], but we don't thrash
osds in the test suite[2] that testing this command.

@Sam, how about adding "ceph osd {pause,unpause}" calls to Thrasher in ceph_manager.py,
so the thrashosd tests can test it as well?

--
[1] suites/rados/singleton/all/cephtool.yaml
[2] suites/rados/singleton/

> Cheers
> 
> On 19/08/2016 09:18, wido@42on.com wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >> Op 19 aug. 2016 om 07:28 heeft Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> het
> >> volgende geschreven:
> >>
> >> Hi Sage,
> >>
> >> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to
> >> release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >> And here is the backport queue :
> >> http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>
> >> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>
> > 
> > I think that this one is a good candidate to go in as well. Since 10.2.4
> > can take a while.
> > 
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17023 /
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10725
> > 
> > Nasty one which might catch users and leave them wondering why the OSDs are
> > not coming up.
> > 
> > Wido
> > 
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> --
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Radoslaw Zarzynski]

Hello,

I'd love to see RadosGW v10.2.3 passing RefStack:

* jewel: rgw: Swift's object versioning doesn't support
  restoring a previous version on DELETE
  http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16393
  https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10710

Regards,
Radek


On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Sage,
>
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi,

On 19/08/2016 13:49, Radoslaw Zarzynski wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I'd love to see RadosGW v10.2.3 passing RefStack:
> 
> * jewel: rgw: Swift's object versioning doesn't support
>   restoring a previous version on DELETE
>   http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16393
>   https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10710

It is scheduled to be tested

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27
http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2016-08-17_11:24:55-rgw-jewel-backports-distro-basic-smithi/

as part of the current integration branch

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-23

If we're lucky (i.e. no infrastructure troubles and no rgw pull request disrupt the test in bizarre ways) it will be ready to merge early next week.

Cheers

> 
> Regards,
> Radek
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 7:27 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Mykola Golub]

Loic,

I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
before the release:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654

I have just merged Jason's PR to master.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> 
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Mykola Golub

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Mykola,

On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> Loic,
> 
> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> before the release:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
> 
> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.

I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization

librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates

Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?

Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.

Cheers

> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Mykola Golub]

"convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
part of this PR:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462

which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
backported too:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903

I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
conflict. This would ease further backporting.

I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. Do we have a
deadline?

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Mykola,
> 
> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> > Loic,
> > 
> > I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> > before the release:
> > 
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
> > 
> > I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
> 
> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
> 
> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
> 
> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
> 
> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> > 
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> Hi Sage,
> >>
> >> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>
> >> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Mykola Golub

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
> "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
> part of this PR:
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
> 
> which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
> backported too:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
> 
> I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
> conflict. This would ease further backporting.

That makes sense.

> I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. 

It would be great, thank you !

> Do we have a deadline?

Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.

Cheers

> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Mykola,
>>
>> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>> Loic,
>>>
>>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
>>> before the release:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
>>>
>>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
>>
>> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
>>
>> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
>>
>> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
>>
>> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>
>>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>>>
>>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Mykola Golub]

Loic, I have created backport PRs:

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10797
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10798

It is not tested yet though. I will be able to start testing tomorrow.

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> 
> 
> On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
> > "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
> > part of this PR:
> > 
> > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
> > 
> > which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
> > backported too:
> > 
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
> > 
> > I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
> > conflict. This would ease further backporting.
> 
> That makes sense.
> 
> > I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. 
> 
> It would be great, thank you !
> 
> > Do we have a deadline?
> 
> Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.
> 
> Cheers
> 
> > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >> Hi Mykola,
> >>
> >> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
> >>> Loic,
> >>>
> >>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
> >>> before the release:
> >>>
> >>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
> >>>
> >>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
> >>
> >> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
> >>
> >> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
> >>
> >> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
> >>
> >> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
> >>
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> >>>> Hi Sage,
> >>>>
> >>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> >>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>>
> >>>> -- 
> >>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>>
> >>
> >> -- 
> >> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

-- 
Mykola Golub

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Excellent, thanks !

On 19/08/2016 22:16, Mykola Golub wrote:
> Loic, I have created backport PRs:
> 
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10797
> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10798
> 
> It is not tested yet though. I will be able to start testing tomorrow.
> 
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 04:43:25PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 19/08/2016 16:01, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>> "convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates" is a
>>> part of this PR:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10462
>>>
>>> which fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16478 and was going to be
>>> backported too:
>>>
>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16903
>>>
>>> I would prefer if we merged all necessary commits to resolve the
>>> conflict. This would ease further backporting.
>>
>> That makes sense.
>>
>>> I can try to prepare a backport PR this weekend. 
>>
>> It would be great, thank you !
>>
>>> Do we have a deadline?
>>
>> Not yet. Given this blocks a few rbd backports, it would be good to wait until it is resolved anyway.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 03:25:36PM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>> Hi Mykola,
>>>>
>>>> On 19/08/2016 15:05, Mykola Golub wrote:
>>>>> Loic,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this regression is highly desirable to be merged to jewel
>>>>> before the release:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16654
>>>>>
>>>>> I have just merged Jason's PR to master.
>>>>
>>>> I created the backport and tried to cherry-pick but running into a conflict that is caused (I think) by the templatization
>>>>
>>>> librbd: convert AioObjectRequest/AioObjectRead classes to templates
>>>>
>>>> Should the templatization and all it entails be backported ? Or should the conflict be resolved by adapting the code to the non template jewel form ?
>>>>
>>>> Your help would be much appreciated in that matter and I assigned http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/17080#note-2 to you for that reason. If you don't have time to deal with this, please let me know and unassign yourself.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Sage,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>>>>>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Sage Weil]

On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> 
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?

It's certainly time for another point release (the last one was mid- 
June).  I think it can wait another couple days though to get all/most of 
the issues people have called out in too?

Thanks!
sage

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

On 19/08/2016 15:57, Sage Weil wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Aug 2016, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> 
> It's certainly time for another point release (the last one was mid- 
> June).  I think it can wait another couple days though to get all/most of 
> the issues people have called out in too?

Sure.

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Fabian Grünbichler]

On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
> Hi Sage,
> 
> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
> 
> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
> 
> Cheers
> 
> -- 
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 

We'd like to also see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 included if
possible, as it currently blocks upgrades to Jewel for existing
installations.

Regards,
Fabian

Re: releasing jewel v10.2.3 ?

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Fabian,

Since it has not yet been merged in master yet there is little chance the backport will make it to 10.2.3. It would be nice to document a workaround in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 in the meantime.

Cheers

On 22/08/2016 11:59, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 07:27:44AM +0200, Loic Dachary wrote:
>> Hi Sage,
>>
>> Here are the issues that would be in jewel v10.2.3 if we decided to release it now: http://tracker.ceph.com/versions/518
>> And here is the backport queue : http://tracker.ceph.com/projects/ceph/issues?query_id=96
>>
>> Do you think it is time to cut the release and ask QE to start testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> -- 
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
>>
> 
> We'd like to also see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16255 included if
> possible, as it currently blocks upgrades to Jewel for existing
> installations.
> 
> Regards,
> Fabian
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre