All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: s.nawrocki@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, kgene@kernel.org,
	k.kozlowski@samsung.com, chanwoo@kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5260: Move struct samsung_cmu_info to init section
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:35:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BBB66E.2060807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823005512.GP6502@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

On 2016=EB=85=84 08=EC=9B=94 23=EC=9D=BC 09:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/22, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch moves the all samsung_cmu_info struct to initconst section
>> because they are used only in initconst section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> index a43642c36039..fd1d9bfc151b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> @@ -131,21 +131,21 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock aud_gate_clks[] __initconst =3D {
>>  			EN_IP_AUD, 4, 0, 0),
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct samsung_cmu_info aud_cmu __initconst =3D {
>> +	.mux_clks	=3D aud_mux_clks,
>> +	.nr_mux_clks	=3D ARRAY_SIZE(aud_mux_clks),
>> +	.div_clks	=3D aud_div_clks,
>> +	.nr_div_clks	=3D ARRAY_SIZE(aud_div_clks),
>> +	.gate_clks	=3D aud_gate_clks,
>> +	.nr_gate_clks	=3D ARRAY_SIZE(aud_gate_clks),
>> +	.nr_clk_ids	=3D AUD_NR_CLK,
>> +	.clk_regs	=3D aud_clk_regs,
>> +	.nr_clk_regs	=3D ARRAY_SIZE(aud_clk_regs),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void __init exynos5260_clk_aud_init(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> -	struct samsung_cmu_info cmu =3D { NULL };
>> -
> 
> I presume this was done this way to save some initdata space by
> only allocating the array that's needed at runtime=3F I would
> expect to see some more kernel image bloat from this change but
> runtime memory usage would stay the same. Is there any real
> benefit from this patch though=3F
> 

After this patch, 'struct samsung_cmu_info' size should be added
to kernel image and then the size of deleted code should be removed
from kernel image. I think that it is not bloating.
(struct samsung_cmu_info includes the pointer and integer value.)

This patch make the code more simple and improve the readability.
And, the samsung_cmu_register_on() requires the 'const' type
argument for 'struct samsung_cmu_info'.

Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: s.nawrocki@samsung.com, tomasz.figa@gmail.com,
	mturquette@baylibre.com, kgene@kernel.org,
	k.kozlowski@samsung.com, chanwoo@kernel.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5260: Move struct samsung_cmu_info to init section
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:35:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BBB66E.2060807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823005512.GP6502@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

On 2016년 08월 23일 09:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/22, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch moves the all samsung_cmu_info struct to initconst section
>> because they are used only in initconst section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> index a43642c36039..fd1d9bfc151b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> @@ -131,21 +131,21 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock aud_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
>>  			EN_IP_AUD, 4, 0, 0),
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct samsung_cmu_info aud_cmu __initconst = {
>> +	.mux_clks	= aud_mux_clks,
>> +	.nr_mux_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_mux_clks),
>> +	.div_clks	= aud_div_clks,
>> +	.nr_div_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_div_clks),
>> +	.gate_clks	= aud_gate_clks,
>> +	.nr_gate_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_gate_clks),
>> +	.nr_clk_ids	= AUD_NR_CLK,
>> +	.clk_regs	= aud_clk_regs,
>> +	.nr_clk_regs	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_clk_regs),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void __init exynos5260_clk_aud_init(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> -	struct samsung_cmu_info cmu = { NULL };
>> -
> 
> I presume this was done this way to save some initdata space by
> only allocating the array that's needed at runtime? I would
> expect to see some more kernel image bloat from this change but
> runtime memory usage would stay the same. Is there any real
> benefit from this patch though?
> 

After this patch, 'struct samsung_cmu_info' size should be added
to kernel image and then the size of deleted code should be removed
from kernel image. I think that it is not bloating.
(struct samsung_cmu_info includes the pointer and integer value.)

This patch make the code more simple and improve the readability.
And, the samsung_cmu_register_on() requires the 'const' type
argument for 'struct samsung_cmu_info'.

Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: cw00.choi@samsung.com (Chanwoo Choi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5260: Move struct samsung_cmu_info to init section
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:35:26 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57BBB66E.2060807@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160823005512.GP6502@codeaurora.org>

Hi Stephen,

On 2016? 08? 23? 09:55, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 08/22, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
>> This patch moves the all samsung_cmu_info struct to initconst section
>> because they are used only in initconst section.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c | 350 +++++++++++++++++------------------
>>  1 file changed, 175 insertions(+), 175 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> index a43642c36039..fd1d9bfc151b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5260.c
>> @@ -131,21 +131,21 @@ static const struct samsung_gate_clock aud_gate_clks[] __initconst = {
>>  			EN_IP_AUD, 4, 0, 0),
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct samsung_cmu_info aud_cmu __initconst = {
>> +	.mux_clks	= aud_mux_clks,
>> +	.nr_mux_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_mux_clks),
>> +	.div_clks	= aud_div_clks,
>> +	.nr_div_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_div_clks),
>> +	.gate_clks	= aud_gate_clks,
>> +	.nr_gate_clks	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_gate_clks),
>> +	.nr_clk_ids	= AUD_NR_CLK,
>> +	.clk_regs	= aud_clk_regs,
>> +	.nr_clk_regs	= ARRAY_SIZE(aud_clk_regs),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static void __init exynos5260_clk_aud_init(struct device_node *np)
>>  {
>> -	struct samsung_cmu_info cmu = { NULL };
>> -
> 
> I presume this was done this way to save some initdata space by
> only allocating the array that's needed at runtime? I would
> expect to see some more kernel image bloat from this change but
> runtime memory usage would stay the same. Is there any real
> benefit from this patch though?
> 

After this patch, 'struct samsung_cmu_info' size should be added
to kernel image and then the size of deleted code should be removed
from kernel image. I think that it is not bloating.
(struct samsung_cmu_info includes the pointer and integer value.)

This patch make the code more simple and improve the readability.
And, the samsung_cmu_register_on() requires the 'const' type
argument for 'struct samsung_cmu_info'.

Regards,
Chanwoo Choi

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-23  2:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-22  2:49 [PATCH 0/2] clk: samsung: Move struct samsung_cmu_info to init section Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-22  2:49 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-22  2:49 ` [PATCH 1/2] clk: samsung: exynos5260: " Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-22  2:49   ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-23  0:55   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-23  0:55     ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-23  2:35     ` Chanwoo Choi [this message]
2016-08-23  2:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-23  2:35       ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-23 10:07       ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-08-23 10:07         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-08-23 10:07         ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-08-24  4:43         ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-24  4:43           ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-24  8:38           ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-24  8:38             ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-25  0:11             ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-25  0:11               ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-25  0:11               ` Stephen Boyd
2016-08-25  7:28               ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-25  7:28                 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-25  7:28                 ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-25 14:43                 ` Tomasz Figa
2016-08-25 14:43                   ` Tomasz Figa
2016-08-25 14:43                   ` Tomasz Figa
2016-09-01 17:06   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-09-01 17:06     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-09-01 17:06     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-08-22  2:49 ` [PATCH 2/2] clk: samsung: exynos5410: Use samsung_cmu_register_one() to simplify code Chanwoo Choi
2016-08-22  2:49   ` Chanwoo Choi
2016-09-01 17:07   ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-09-01 17:07     ` Sylwester Nawrocki
2016-09-01 17:07     ` Sylwester Nawrocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57BBB66E.2060807@samsung.com \
    --to=cw00.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=chanwoo@kernel.org \
    --cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=kgene@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=s.nawrocki@samsung.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.