rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3

rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Yehuda,

The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?

Cheers

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3

[Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub]

Hey Casey,

are all the multisite fixes we wanted in?

On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
> Hi Yehuda,
>
> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>
> Cheers
>
> --
> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3

[Casey Bodley]

On 08/24/2016 12:41 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
> Hey Casey,
>
> are all the multisite fixes we wanted in?

There are still a few pending backport, including 3 in particular that 
fix segfaults:

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16901
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16864
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696

It looks like that last one is blocked by conflicts with the tenant 
support backport in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702. I'll rebase 
that one and open a PR.

Casey

>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>> Hi Yehuda,
>>
>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> --
>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre

Re: rgw and the next jewel release v10.2.3

[Loic Dachary]

Hi Casey,

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696
http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702

were merged right now via

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10845

the remaining two have been tested and await approval

https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10662
https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/10660

A dozen other pull requests could also be merged if you'd like since they passed a rgw run.

Cheers

On 24/08/2016 19:32, Casey Bodley wrote:
> 
> On 08/24/2016 12:41 PM, Yehuda Sadeh-Weinraub wrote:
>> Hey Casey,
>>
>> are all the multisite fixes we wanted in?
> 
> There are still a few pending backport, including 3 in particular that fix segfaults:
> 
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16901
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16864
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16696
> 
> It looks like that last one is blocked by conflicts with the tenant support backport in http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16702. I'll rebase that one and open a PR.
> 
> Casey
> 
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:01 AM, Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org> wrote:
>>> Hi Yehuda,
>>>
>>> The next jewel release as found at https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/jewel passed the rgw suite (http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16344#note-27 except for two failures). Do you think the jewel branch is ready for QE to start their own round of testing ?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre
> 
> -- 
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 

-- 
Loïc Dachary, Artisan Logiciel Libre