All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:48:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C153D0.3010309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e046b40-1c8e-717f-68b1-534c3125724c@users.sourceforge.net>



Am 26.08.2016 20:02, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:32:53 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> index 85d0951..c7f9eea 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -474,12 +474,12 @@ void __init sn_irq_lh_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head *) * NR_IRQS, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc_array(NR_IRQS, sizeof(*sn_irq_lh), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sn_irq_lh)
>  		panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed to allocate memory for PCI init\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
> -		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(*sn_irq_lh[i], GFP_KERNEL);

perhaps a sizeof(*sn_irq_lh[i]) is here intended ?

re,
 wh

>  		if (!sn_irq_lh[i])
>  			panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed IRQ memory allocation\n");
>  

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:48:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C153D0.3010309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e046b40-1c8e-717f-68b1-534c3125724c@users.sourceforge.net>



Am 26.08.2016 20:02, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:32:53 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> index 85d0951..c7f9eea 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -474,12 +474,12 @@ void __init sn_irq_lh_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head *) * NR_IRQS, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc_array(NR_IRQS, sizeof(*sn_irq_lh), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sn_irq_lh)
>  		panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed to allocate memory for PCI init\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
> -		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(*sn_irq_lh[i], GFP_KERNEL);

perhaps a sizeof(*sn_irq_lh[i]) is here intended ?

re,
 wh

>  		if (!sn_irq_lh[i])
>  			panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed IRQ memory allocation\n");
>  

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: walter harms <wharms@bfs.de>
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
Cc: linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init()
Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:48:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <57C153D0.3010309@bfs.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e046b40-1c8e-717f-68b1-534c3125724c@users.sourceforge.net>



Am 26.08.2016 20:02, schrieb SF Markus Elfring:
> From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:32:53 +0200
> 
> * A multiplication for the size determination of a memory allocation
>   indicated that an array data structure should be processed.
>   Thus use the corresponding function "kmalloc_array".
> 
>   This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> * Replace the specification of data structures by pointer dereferences
>   to make the corresponding size determination a bit safer according to
>   the Linux coding style convention.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> ---
>  arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> index 85d0951..c7f9eea 100644
> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> +++ b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/irq.c
> @@ -474,12 +474,12 @@ void __init sn_irq_lh_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  
> -	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head *) * NR_IRQS, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	sn_irq_lh = kmalloc_array(NR_IRQS, sizeof(*sn_irq_lh), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!sn_irq_lh)
>  		panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed to allocate memory for PCI init\n");
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < NR_IRQS; i++) {
> -		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(sizeof(struct list_head), GFP_KERNEL);
> +		sn_irq_lh[i] = kmalloc(*sn_irq_lh[i], GFP_KERNEL);

perhaps a sizeof(*sn_irq_lh[i]) is here intended ?

re,
 wh

>  		if (!sn_irq_lh[i])
>  			panic("SN PCI INIT: Failed IRQ memory allocation\n");
>  

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-08-27  8:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-26 18:00 [PATCH 0/5] IA64: Fine-tuning for some function implementations SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:00 ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/5] IA64-IRQ: Use kmalloc_array() in sn_irq_lh_init() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:02   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 19:57   ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-26 19:57     ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-26 21:02     ` Joe Perches
2016-08-26 21:02       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-26 21:02       ` Joe Perches
2016-08-27  7:02       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-27  7:02         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-27  7:02         ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-28  0:40         ` Joe Perches
2016-08-28  0:40           ` Joe Perches
2016-08-28  7:37           ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-28  7:37             ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-28  9:28           ` [PATCH 1/5] " Julia Lawall
2016-08-28  9:28             ` Julia Lawall
2016-08-28 18:33             ` Joe Perches
2016-08-28 18:33               ` Joe Perches
2016-08-28 18:33               ` Joe Perches
2016-08-27  6:20     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-27  6:20       ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:18   ` [PATCH 1/5] " kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:18     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:18     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-27  8:48   ` walter harms [this message]
2016-08-27  8:48     ` walter harms
2016-08-27  8:48     ` walter harms
2016-08-26 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] IA64-IRQ: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:03   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:27   ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:27     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:27     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 18:04 ` [PATCH 3/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Fix indentation in ia64_global_tlb_purge() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:04   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:05 ` [PATCH 4/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Use kmalloc_array() in ia64_itr_entry() SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:05   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:06 ` [PATCH 5/5] ia64/mm/tlb: Delete unnecessary braces SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 18:06   ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-26 20:42   ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:42     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-26 20:42     ` kbuild test robot
2016-08-27  7:29     ` SF Markus Elfring
2016-08-27  7:29       ` SF Markus Elfring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=57C153D0.3010309@bfs.de \
    --to=wharms@bfs.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=julia.lawall@lip6.fr \
    --cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.