From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/473: test return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:48:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A2519F4.5040102@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204092558.GH2749@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
>> On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
>>>> If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and
>>>> mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return
>>>> EBUSY instead of pass.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better?
>> Hi Eryu,
>>
>> Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into
>> blktests?
>> (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351)
> I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that
> take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108.
> generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before
> blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group
> and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to
> blktests.
Hi Eryu,
Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests.
Thanks,
Xiao Yang
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
>
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Xiao Yang <yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: <fstests@vger.kernel.org>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>,
<linux-block@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] generic/473: test return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 17:48:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5A2519F4.5040102@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204092558.GH2749@eguan.usersys.redhat.com>
On 2017/12/04 17:25, Eryu Guan wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 05:15:17PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
>> On 2017/12/04 16:29, Eryu Guan wrote:
>>> On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 08:02:26PM +0800, Xiao Yang wrote:
>>>> If the entire block device is formatted with a filesystem and
>>>> mounted, running "blockdev --rereadpt" should fail and return
>>>> EBUSY instead of pass.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Xiao Yang<yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com>
>>> As we have blktests[1] now, I think this may fit in blktests better?
>> Hi Eryu,
>>
>> Do you think test cases which use scsi_debug module should be moved into
>> blktests?
>> (e.g. generic/108, generic/349, generic/350, generic/351)
> I don't think they need to be moved to blktests. Most other tests that
> take use of scsi_debug are for filesystem testing, e.g. generic/108.
> generic/349 generic/35[01] are a bit special, they were there before
> blktests was announced available, so they're in a special blockdev group
> and not in the auto group. If Omar agrees, I think they can be ported to
> blktests.
Hi Eryu,
Thanks for your explanation, and i will try to send it to blktests.
Thanks,
Xiao Yang
> Thanks,
> Eryu
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-29 12:02 [PATCH] generic/473: test return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev Xiao Yang
2017-12-04 8:29 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-04 9:15 ` Xiao Yang
2017-12-04 9:15 ` Xiao Yang
2017-12-04 9:25 ` Eryu Guan
2017-12-04 9:48 ` Xiao Yang [this message]
2017-12-04 9:48 ` Xiao Yang
2017-12-04 18:29 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-12-19 10:30 ` [PATCH blktests] block/013: Add test for BLKRRPART ioctl xiao yang
2017-12-19 10:30 ` xiao yang
2017-12-19 10:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-19 10:47 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-19 19:42 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-12-20 8:03 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-19 23:42 ` Omar Sandoval
2017-12-19 10:45 ` [PATCH] generic/473: test return EBUSY from BLKRRPART for mounted whole-dev Xiao Yang
2017-12-19 10:45 ` Xiao Yang
2017-12-19 10:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-19 10:53 ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-12-19 10:59 ` Xiao Yang
2017-12-19 10:59 ` Xiao Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5A2519F4.5040102@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=yangx.jy@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=eguan@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osandov@osandov.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.