From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com>
Cc: "shawn.lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: rockchip: Add internal support for 24-bit fractional dividers
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:56:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6321950.31tnzDBltd@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_AE0E51DA2FACC999E65D6631016044234005@qq.com>
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2026, 11:41:25 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Cunhao Lu:
> > I guess you are describing what you changed against the
> > original patch from Elaine. But this is not how it works.
>
> I'm very sorry for the mistake. After carefully reviewing the guidelines,
> I understand that my notes about changes to Elaine's original patch should
> have been enclosed in square brackets []. I will keep only the significant
> changes in those notes and place them within square brackets.
>
> Thank you again for pointing out my mistake. This reminds me that I still
> have much to learn.
and as I wrote in my reply to Krzysztof slightly, less verbosity is
usually better. I.e. a short description what you did, not a detailed
list is usually nicer, i.e. something like
+++++++++++++
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
[adapted to mainline rockchip clock and reset handling (xin24m input,
don't introduce CLK_NR_CLKS, etc) ]
Signed-off-by: Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com>
+++++++++++++
And as for speed, maybe give it a bit more time between iterations.
A version per day is a bit fast, as it doesn't give people time to actually
respond.
_______________________________________________
Linux-rockchip mailing list
Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Brian Masney <bmasney+clk@redhat.com>,
Jerome Brunet <jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com>
Cc: "shawn.lin" <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>,
linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: rockchip: Add internal support for 24-bit fractional dividers
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:56:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6321950.31tnzDBltd@diego> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tencent_AE0E51DA2FACC999E65D6631016044234005@qq.com>
Am Dienstag, 27. Oktober 2026, 11:41:25 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb Cunhao Lu:
> > I guess you are describing what you changed against the
> > original patch from Elaine. But this is not how it works.
>
> I'm very sorry for the mistake. After carefully reviewing the guidelines,
> I understand that my notes about changes to Elaine's original patch should
> have been enclosed in square brackets []. I will keep only the significant
> changes in those notes and place them within square brackets.
>
> Thank you again for pointing out my mistake. This reminds me that I still
> have much to learn.
and as I wrote in my reply to Krzysztof slightly, less verbosity is
usually better. I.e. a short description what you did, not a detailed
list is usually nicer, i.e. something like
+++++++++++++
Signed-off-by: Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@rock-chips.com>
[adapted to mainline rockchip clock and reset handling (xin24m input,
don't introduce CLK_NR_CLKS, etc) ]
Signed-off-by: Cunhao Lu <1579567540@qq.com>
+++++++++++++
And as for speed, maybe give it a bit more time between iterations.
A version per day is a bit fast, as it doesn't give people time to actually
respond.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 10:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-27 10:04 [PATCH v4 0/4] clk: rockchip: Add RK3572 clock and reset support Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: clock: rockchip: Add RK3572 CRU Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 18:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-27 18:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-10-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] clk: rockchip: Add internal support for 24-bit fractional dividers Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:11 ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-27 10:11 ` Shawn Lin
2026-10-27 10:41 ` Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:41 ` Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:56 ` Heiko Stübner [this message]
2026-10-27 10:56 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-10-27 11:31 ` Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 11:31 ` Cunhao Lu
2026-10-28 10:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] clk: rockchip: Add composite clock macro with mux table Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] clk: rockchip: Add RK3572 clock and reset support Cunhao Lu
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
2026-10-27 10:04 ` Cunhao Lu via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6321950.31tnzDBltd@diego \
--to=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=1579567540@qq.com \
--cc=bmasney+clk@redhat.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jbrunet+clk@baylibre.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
--cc=zhangqing@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.