All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org, olof@lixom.net,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	eric.dumazet@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:03:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6370082.rfihnaNWhf@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151117164453.GF30101@arm.com>

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 16:44:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > 8<----
> > Subject: ARM64: make smp_load_acquire() work with const arguments
> > 
> > smp_load_acquire() uses typeof() to declare a local variable for temporarily
> > storing the output of the memory access. This fails when the argument is
> > constant, because the assembler complains about using a constant register
> > as output:
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1'
> >  used as 'asm' output
> 
> Do you know the usage in the kernel causing this warning?

A newly introduced function in include/net/sock.h:

static inline int sk_state_load(const struct sock *sk)
{
        return smp_load_acquire(&sk->sk_state);
}

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117)
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 18:03:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6370082.rfihnaNWhf@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151117164453.GF30101@arm.com>

On Tuesday 17 November 2015 16:44:53 Will Deacon wrote:
> > 8<----
> > Subject: ARM64: make smp_load_acquire() work with const arguments
> > 
> > smp_load_acquire() uses typeof() to declare a local variable for temporarily
> > storing the output of the memory access. This fails when the argument is
> > constant, because the assembler complains about using a constant register
> > as output:
> > 
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h:71:3: error: read-only variable '___p1'
> >  used as 'asm' output
> 
> Do you know the usage in the kernel causing this warning?

A newly introduced function in include/net/sock.h:

static inline int sk_state_load(const struct sock *sk)
{
        return smp_load_acquire(&sk->sk_state);
}

	Arnd

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17 17:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <564a9961.878b420a.331b8.fffffd62@mx.google.com>
2015-11-17  8:57 ` next build: 235 warnings 3 failures (next/next-20151117) Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17  8:57   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 16:44   ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 16:44     ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 17:01     ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-17 17:01       ` Eric Dumazet
2015-11-17 17:03     ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-11-17 17:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 17:12       ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 17:12         ` Will Deacon
2015-11-17 19:17         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-17 19:17           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-11-18 10:14           ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 10:14             ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 12:11             ` David Laight
2015-11-18 12:11               ` David Laight
2015-11-18 12:28               ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 12:28                 ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 15:21                 ` David Laight
2015-11-18 15:21                   ` David Laight
2015-11-18 15:36                   ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 15:36                     ` Will Deacon
2015-11-18 15:57                     ` David Laight
2015-11-18 15:57                       ` David Laight
2015-11-18 10:22           ` David Laight
2015-11-18 10:22             ` David Laight

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6370082.rfihnaNWhf@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel-build-reports@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.