Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/5] memcg: uncharge in batched manner

["KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki" <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>]

Balbir Singh wrote:
> * KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> [2009-08-31
> 21:14:10]:
>
>> Balbir Singh wrote:
>> >> > Does this effect deleting of a group and delay it by a large
>> amount?
>> >> >
>> >> plz see what cgroup_release_and_xxxx  fixed. This is not for delay
>> >> but for race-condition, which makes rmdir sleep permanently.
>> >>
>> >
>> > I've seen those patches, where rmdir() can hang. My conern was time
>> > elapsed since we do css_get() and do a cgroup_release_and_wake_rmdir()
>> >
>> plz read unmap() and truncate() code.
>> The number of pages handled without cond_resched() is limited.
>>
>>
>
> I understand that part, I was referring to tasks stuck doing rmdir()
> while we do batched uncharge, will it be very visible to the end user?
truncate/invalidate etc...is done in chunk of pagevec size.
Now, it's 14. then, batched uncharge is done per 14 pages, IIUC.

> cond_resched() is bad in this case.. since it means we'll stay longer
> before we release the cgroup.

cond_resched() is caller's matter. Not related memcg because we dont't
call it.

Thanks,
-Kame

>
>
> --
> 	Balbir
>