From: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up PMIC nodes
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:17:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6572C2F2.9090202@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130175635.14251-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Hi Johan,
On 2023/12/1 1:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
>
> This series cleans up the hisilicon hikey970 PMIC dtsi which appears to
> have been used as the basis for some of the examples.
>
> Note that the binding documents "hisilicon,hi6421v600-spmi" while the
> devicetree and driver only uses and recognises "hisilicon,hi6421-spmi".
> I'll leave that as is for now...
>
> Johan
>
>
> Johan Hovold (2):
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: fix regulator cells properties
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up SPMI node
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey970-pmic.dtsi | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Series applied to the HiSilicon arm64 dt tree as the binding part has been applied.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Wei
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up PMIC nodes
Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2023 15:17:06 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6572C2F2.9090202@hisilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231130175635.14251-1-johan+linaro@kernel.org>
Hi Johan,
On 2023/12/1 1:56, Johan Hovold wrote:
> When reviewing the various SPMI PMIC bindings, I noticed that several
> examples were incorrect and misleading and could also use some cleanup.
>
> This series cleans up the hisilicon hikey970 PMIC dtsi which appears to
> have been used as the basis for some of the examples.
>
> Note that the binding documents "hisilicon,hi6421v600-spmi" while the
> devicetree and driver only uses and recognises "hisilicon,hi6421-spmi".
> I'll leave that as is for now...
>
> Johan
>
>
> Johan Hovold (2):
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: fix regulator cells properties
> arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up SPMI node
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/hisilicon/hikey970-pmic.dtsi | 6 +-----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Series applied to the HiSilicon arm64 dt tree as the binding part has been applied.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Wei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-08 7:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-30 17:56 [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up PMIC nodes Johan Hovold
2023-11-30 17:56 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-30 17:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: fix regulator cells properties Johan Hovold
2023-11-30 17:56 ` Johan Hovold
2023-11-30 17:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up SPMI node Johan Hovold
2023-11-30 17:56 ` Johan Hovold
2023-12-08 7:17 ` Wei Xu [this message]
2023-12-08 7:17 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: hisilicon: hikey970-pmic: clean up PMIC nodes Wei Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6572C2F2.9090202@hisilicon.com \
--to=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.