From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] efifb: avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:49:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704b8b8c-e607-29b3-e101-bbecd90073bb@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8Uw-X3AR6aQYevPdRfcgPNnqL4O3sRoKxsZAiW29sbqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/22/2017 3:41 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> As far as I know, kernel honors resource assignments done by the UEFI BIOS if
>> they are correct. Kernel will reassign the resources only if something is wrong.
>>
> No, the kernel always reassigns all BARs on arm64.
I think this is where the problem is.
I'm not seeing this happen on QDF2400 which supports ACPI + UEFI BIOS
combination only.
I see that kernel honored the resources assigned by UEFI BIOS if I compare
the BAR addresses.
I see reassignment only when something is horribly broken. Then, there would
be a bridge configuration invalid message in the boot log to confirm this.
>
>> Will this code break other platforms/architectures?
>>
> Which platforms/architectures are you referring to? EFIFB on a PCI
> device is currently broken on arm64.
In general or on your particular platform?
> On x86, it works, given that BARs
> are usually not reassigned, and so the patch should be a no-op in that
> case (although I'd argue it is still an improvement to check whether
> the device that owns the BAR actually has memory decoding enabled
> before we attach the framebuffer driver to it)
>
I'm fine as long as it doesn't break anything. That's why, I'm asking.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org>
To: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Cc: "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
linux-pci <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Heyi Guo <heyi.guo@linaro.org>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] efifb: avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:49:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704b8b8c-e607-29b3-e101-bbecd90073bb@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8Uw-X3AR6aQYevPdRfcgPNnqL4O3sRoKxsZAiW29sbqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/22/2017 3:41 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> As far as I know, kernel honors resource assignments done by the UEFI BIOS if
>> they are correct. Kernel will reassign the resources only if something is wrong.
>>
> No, the kernel always reassigns all BARs on arm64.
I think this is where the problem is.
I'm not seeing this happen on QDF2400 which supports ACPI + UEFI BIOS
combination only.
I see that kernel honored the resources assigned by UEFI BIOS if I compare
the BAR addresses.
I see reassignment only when something is horribly broken. Then, there would
be a bridge configuration invalid message in the boot log to confirm this.
>
>> Will this code break other platforms/architectures?
>>
> Which platforms/architectures are you referring to? EFIFB on a PCI
> device is currently broken on arm64.
In general or on your particular platform?
> On x86, it works, given that BARs
> are usually not reassigned, and so the patch should be a no-op in that
> case (although I'd argue it is still an improvement to check whether
> the device that owns the BAR actually has memory decoding enabled
> before we attach the framebuffer driver to it)
>
I'm fine as long as it doesn't break anything. That's why, I'm asking.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] efifb: avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 15:49:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <704b8b8c-e607-29b3-e101-bbecd90073bb@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKv+Gu8Uw-X3AR6aQYevPdRfcgPNnqL4O3sRoKxsZAiW29sbqg@mail.gmail.com>
On 3/22/2017 3:41 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> As far as I know, kernel honors resource assignments done by the UEFI BIOS if
>> they are correct. Kernel will reassign the resources only if something is wrong.
>>
> No, the kernel always reassigns all BARs on arm64.
I think this is where the problem is.
I'm not seeing this happen on QDF2400 which supports ACPI + UEFI BIOS
combination only.
I see that kernel honored the resources assigned by UEFI BIOS if I compare
the BAR addresses.
I see reassignment only when something is horribly broken. Then, there would
be a bridge configuration invalid message in the boot log to confirm this.
>
>> Will this code break other platforms/architectures?
>>
> Which platforms/architectures are you referring to? EFIFB on a PCI
> device is currently broken on arm64.
In general or on your particular platform?
> On x86, it works, given that BARs
> are usually not reassigned, and so the patch should be a no-op in that
> case (although I'd argue it is still an improvement to check whether
> the device that owns the BAR actually has memory decoding enabled
> before we attach the framebuffer driver to it)
>
I'm fine as long as it doesn't break anything. That's why, I'm asking.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 19:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 117+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-22 15:30 [PATCH v3] efifb: avoid reconfiguration of BAR that covers the framebuffer Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 15:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 15:30 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <1490196629-28088-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-22 19:31 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-22 19:31 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-22 19:31 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-22 19:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:32 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu_X-SEnz7h9J8boqqjOQGHQawwdSAq4haH-OGu8zdfNfA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-23 8:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-23 8:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-23 8:48 ` Lukas Wunner
2017-03-23 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 9:04 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu93eJ-js3g7M6Jdm6XGMaWMswFmzBG2qNT4rn+3=1+EyA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-23 10:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 10:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 10:57 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 12:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 12:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 12:25 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 14:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 14:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 14:31 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-23 15:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 15:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-23 15:15 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-27 15:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-27 15:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-27 15:37 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 21:27 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 21:27 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 21:27 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 21:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 21:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-28 21:39 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu9LbwpnJNi1OL25MWvYPxEOfKRHcs2jA2121BPaQWPzow-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-28 21:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 21:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-28 21:49 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <27f50de3-721e-e8ec-00c8-b7a9d3cff0d6-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-30 8:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 8:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 8:46 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu-qRg8-YRCairppKrEfeLcW+OwVF8qZHp7vxXJA_AwPOw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-30 10:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 10:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 10:05 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-03-30 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 10:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 11:42 ` okaya
2017-03-30 11:42 ` okaya at codeaurora.org
2017-03-30 11:42 ` okaya
2017-03-30 13:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 13:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 13:38 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-30 13:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-30 13:50 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-30 13:50 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <ae87ae28-f50d-095f-576e-f3fd7f96dea2-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-02 15:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-02 15:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-02 15:16 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu8x0rQUnTUorknW-mW9LFgrxFYsXyy4LU_w9JbA-m_sjA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-10 15:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 15:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 15:28 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 16:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-10 16:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-10 16:53 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-10 17:06 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-10 17:06 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-10 17:06 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-04-10 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 17:13 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu-AN-OwnAJG5dt0Qg4GU8HxZBowTSA0H3LhNA3nHfrsQg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-10 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-10 17:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu9dS4OhLbBw59yKYQmoJ8SpFexzk9yH=XfXnzn8NJ4mcg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-11 13:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-11 13:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-11 13:16 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-04-11 16:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-11 16:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-11 16:06 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-23 1:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-04-23 1:45 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-04-23 1:45 ` Yinghai Lu
[not found] ` <20170423014546.GA2704-HmG2f/OLMhfd32I7TRUmRQWg3BAJk+jzdezBB/11ZoCIZ3GwZIjcak9v6f1uFnsJ2SarAXORi/o@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-27 13:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-27 13:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-04-27 13:55 ` Ard Biesheuvel
[not found] ` <CAKv+Gu_n7xP-2RtF44GVzwyoMXDOeF-bR43yStwp2y+oBNs4jg-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2017-04-28 20:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-04-28 20:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-04-28 20:51 ` Yinghai Lu
2017-03-22 19:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:36 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:41 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:49 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2017-03-22 19:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:49 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:52 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 19:57 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:57 ` Sinan Kaya
2017-03-22 19:57 ` Sinan Kaya
[not found] ` <4ccb4d92-3830-3980-38c3-7085a3d97734-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>
2017-03-22 20:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 20:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-03-22 20:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2017-05-03 3:09 ` Heyi Guo
2017-05-03 3:09 ` Heyi Guo
2017-05-03 3:09 ` Heyi Guo
2017-05-18 14:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-18 14:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-05-18 14:01 ` Bjorn Helgaas
[not found] ` <20170518140154.GA24324-1RhO1Y9PlrlHTL0Zs8A6p5iNqAH0jzoTYJqu5kTmcBRl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2017-05-20 8:19 ` Heyi Guo
2017-05-20 8:19 ` Heyi Guo
2017-05-20 8:19 ` Heyi Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=704b8b8c-e607-29b3-e101-bbecd90073bb@codeaurora.org \
--to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=heyi.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.