Re: To be removed recipes

[Paul Sokolovsky <pmiscml@gmail.com>]

Hello Marcin,

Monday, December 11, 2006, 10:50:15 PM, you wrote:

> Dnia niedziela, 10 grudnia 2006 23:31, Richard Purdie napisał:
>> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:59 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>> > Richard Purdie wrote:

>> > >> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
>> > >> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7
>> > >
>> > > Fine with me.
>> >
>> > This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for
>> > quite some time to save space.
>>
>> In that case we can't remove the no-dbus version needed by opie.

> Does someone tested OPIE with dbus version at all? How much does extra
> packages take etc? Without such testing sentence 'do not remove 
> bluez*nodbus because OPIE needs it' does not have sense.

> I also would like to get rid of bluez 2.x because it will be unmaintained
> software soon due to fact that everyone switched to 3.x versions.

  I agree here, but removing it in such manner hardly helpful either.
Is anything magic in those 2 weeks which are given stuff in
removal.txt? We can have 1 month, 2 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
removal periods. That "6 months" fits bluez2 pretty well, IMHO.




-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com