To be removed recipes

To be removed recipes

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

In case people didn't notice,
http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
which will be removed on the specified dates.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFaw3CMkyGM64RGpERAkMGAJ4hjr51AKY9EkIYhpIxWkVOYa+aSgCfVY5w
jEJ/Uye9HB1AtrNGMbnWeI0=
=/ihV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: To be removed recipes

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Koen Kooi schreef:
> Hi,
> 
> In case people didn't notice,
> http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
> which will be removed on the specified dates.

Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFeAsuMkyGM64RGpERArQRAJ9+otB3QbeNqVIDKopHWG+CwG/++wCeLFgs
0OMcqDTE8F8+BHgZ7z3Lbg4=
=0fL+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: To be removed recipes

[Richard Purdie]

On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:38 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
> > In case people didn't notice,
> > http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
> > which will be removed on the specified dates.
> 
> Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.

> Package Name:   Maemo
> Reason:         Unfetchable, obsoleted by IT2006 release.

I don't know what we should do with these for the best. The end result
will be maemo being near enough totally removed from OE which sends out
the wrong message. I would ultimately like to see maemo in OE...

Maybe a contender for moving to non-working?

> Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
> Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base

Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...

> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7               

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   mono
> Reason:         Obsolete version - 1.2 is current, 1.0 is not fetchable

non-working - ultimately we probably want mono
 
> Package Name:   zeecookbook
> Reason:         Not maintained upstream, not fetchable

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   qpe-vexed
> Reason:         Not fetchable, all search results points to OE related infos

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   ipac-ng
> Reason:         Depends on libgd-perl which is not in metada

> Package Name:   
? (there are two of these)
 
> Package Name:   nsqld
> Reason:		Never used

Fine with me.

> Package Name:   gpe-mileage
> Reason:         Unfinished, no development progress

Fine with me.

Re: To be removed recipes

[Paul Sokolovsky]

Hello Richard,

Thursday, December 7, 2006, 3:09:03 PM, you wrote:

>> Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.

[]

>> Package Name:   mono
>> Reason:         Obsolete version - 1.2 is current, 1.0 is not fetchable

> non-working - ultimately we probably want mono

  I'd second this - I would be interested to update it, but won't have
a chance for some time. But it's pretty important package to remove
any trace of it from HEAD.


[]

-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com

Re: To be removed recipes

[Michael 'Mickey' Lauer]

Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-12-07 at 13:38 +0100, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> > In case people didn't notice,
>> > http://www.openembedded.org/repo/org.openembedded.dev/removal.txt has a few entries now,
>> > which will be removed on the specified dates.
>> 
>> Only 5 days left till the first batch gets removed.

>> Package Name:   Maemo
>> Reason:         Unfetchable, obsoleted by IT2006 release.

> I don't know what we should do with these for the best. The end result
> will be maemo being near enough totally removed from OE which sends out
> the wrong message. I would ultimately like to see maemo in OE...

> Maybe a contender for moving to non-working?

I agree.

>> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
>> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7               

> Fine with me.

This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for
quite some time to save space.

>> Package Name:   zeecookbook
>> Reason:         Not maintained upstream, not fetchable

Regards,

:M:
-- 
Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | IT-Freelancer | http://www.vanille-media.de

Re: To be removed recipes

[Richard Purdie]

On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:59 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> Richard Purdie wrote:
> >> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
> >> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7               
> 
> > Fine with me.
> 
> This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for
> quite some time to save space.

In that case we can't remove the no-dbus version needed by opie.

Richard

Re: To be removed recipes

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

Dnia niedziela, 10 grudnia 2006 23:31, Richard Purdie napisał:
> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:59 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
> > Richard Purdie wrote:

> > >> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
> > >> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7
> > >
> > > Fine with me.
> >
> > This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for
> > quite some time to save space.
>
> In that case we can't remove the no-dbus version needed by opie.

Does someone tested OPIE with dbus version at all? How much does extra 
packages take etc? Without such testing sentence 'do not remove 
bluez*nodbus because OPIE needs it' does not have sense.

I also would like to get rid of bluez 2.x because it will be unmaintained 
software soon due to fact that everyone switched to 3.x versions.

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

         You can close your eyes to reality, but not to memories.

Re: To be removed recipes

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

Dnia piątek, 8 grudnia 2006 17:11, Paul Sokolovsky napisał:
> >> Package Name:   mono
> >> Reason:         Obsolete version - 1.2 is current, 1.0 is not
> >> fetchable

> > non-working - ultimately we probably want mono

>   I'd second this - I would be interested to update it, but won't have
> a chance for some time. But it's pretty important package to remove
> any trace of it from HEAD.

We have SCM so anyone can find traces of anything which was removed from 
OE metadata. 

Having software forgotten by upstream is not a good thing for me. If you 
want to fix mono situation make it atleast fetchable so it can be build.

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

        Due to unexpected conditions Windows 2000 will be released
        in first quarter of year 1901

Re: To be removed recipes

[Paul Sokolovsky]

Hello Marcin,

Monday, December 11, 2006, 10:50:15 PM, you wrote:

> Dnia niedziela, 10 grudnia 2006 23:31, Richard Purdie napisał:
>> On Fri, 2006-12-08 at 17:59 +0100, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote:
>> > Richard Purdie wrote:

>> > >> Package Name:   bluez*2.*
>> > >> Reason:         Obsolete by, and conflicts with bluez 3.7
>> > >
>> > > Fine with me.
>> >
>> > This can be a problem for Opie, since we used the no-dbus version for
>> > quite some time to save space.
>>
>> In that case we can't remove the no-dbus version needed by opie.

> Does someone tested OPIE with dbus version at all? How much does extra
> packages take etc? Without such testing sentence 'do not remove 
> bluez*nodbus because OPIE needs it' does not have sense.

> I also would like to get rid of bluez 2.x because it will be unmaintained
> software soon due to fact that everyone switched to 3.x versions.

  I agree here, but removing it in such manner hardly helpful either.
Is anything magic in those 2 weeks which are given stuff in
removal.txt? We can have 1 month, 2 month, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year
removal periods. That "6 months" fits bluez2 pretty well, IMHO.




-- 
Best regards,
 Paul                            mailto:pmiscml@gmail.com

Re: To be removed recipes

[Marcin Juszkiewicz]

Dnia czwartek, 7 grudnia 2006 14:09, Richard Purdie napisał:
> > Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
> > Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base
>
> Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...

http://www.hrw.one.pl/2006/12/12/how-to-use-task-base/ 

This can be good read for those which still use task-bootstrap.

-- 
JID: hrw-jabber.org
OpenEmbedded developer/consultant

        Happiness? Happiness is an illusion. It is an empty dream.
        A word without meaning. It is nothing. Or everything.

Re: To be removed recipes

[Koen Kooi]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Purdie schreef:

 >> Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
>> Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base
> 
> Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...

I pushed back removal to next week, but I still haven't noticed anyone using it, so it
will go away next week.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFg9CwMkyGM64RGpERAijDAKC5kn0RFTCEVDykUv7UaLQnGEMh8gCeKRtx
fOuTb9aHfrbg5NHG/rRgD7M=
=NgBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: To be removed recipes

[Robert Woerle]

Koen Kooi schrieb:
> Richard Purdie schreef:
>
>  >> Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
> >>> Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base
> >> Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...
>
> I pushed back removal to next week, but I still haven't noticed anyone
> using it, so it
> will go away next week.
Dear Koen

I was using it in order to create a small image for my pxa270
development which  i do currently .
but i was not satisfied with the installation afterwards when i
installed gtk and X onto it.

I bet task-base will do the same for my needs. I planned to use the
minimlistic image i can get and then only install my additions one by
one and end up with the smallest
footprint possible, but i am sure task-base will do that trick also

Cheers
>
> regards,
>
> Koen

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

Re: To be removed recipes

[Martyn Welch]

Hi,

Being rather new to OE, I think I did a few days ago. Might it be an idea to check the documentation before removing it:

http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/GettingStarted (under "Start Building")

http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/UsefulTargets

Martyn


----
This e-mail is private and confidential and is for the addressee only. If misdirected, please notify me by telephone and confirm that it has been deleted from your system and any hard copies destroyed. You are strictly prohibited from using, printing or disseminating it or any information contained in it, save to the intended recipient.

-----Original Message-----
From: openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org [mailto:openembedded-devel-bounces@lists.openembedded.org] On Behalf Of Koen Kooi
Sent: 16 December 2006 10:56 AM
To: openembedded-devel@openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [oe] To be removed recipes

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Richard Purdie schreef:

 >> Package Name:   task-bootstrap*
>> Reason:         Obsoleted by task-base
> 
> Have we anyone still using this? I'm nervous removing this just yet...

I pushed back removal to next week, but I still haven't noticed anyone using it, so it will go away next week.

regards,

Koen
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFFg9CwMkyGM64RGpERAijDAKC5kn0RFTCEVDykUv7UaLQnGEMh8gCeKRtx
fOuTb9aHfrbg5NHG/rRgD7M=
=NgBm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Openembedded-devel mailing list
Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org
http://lists.linuxtogo.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-devel

________________________________________________________________________
This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star.The service is powered by MessageLabs. 
________________________________________________________________________

Re: To be removed recipes

[Rolf Leggewie]

Martyn Welch wrote:
> Might it be an idea to check the documentation before removing it:

Thanks Martin for the hint.  I blindly replaced all occurrences of 
task-bootstrap with task-base on the pages you mentioned.

Using the wiki search, I also found http://www.openembedded.org/oetodo 
and http://www.openembedded.org/firstproject but did not feel like they 
needed to be changed.