From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@kernel.org>
To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: hwprobe: Avoid uninitialized read in hwprobe_get_cpus()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:05:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77749c92-ac8a-4074-bb59-59dbbd3d84f2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612045502.70850-1-mark.hsj@gmail.com>
On 12/6/26 2:55 pm, Mark Harris wrote:
> When cpusetsize < cpumask_size(), hwprobe_get_cpus() did not fully
> initialize its copy of the cpu mask, which could cause non-deterministic
> results from the riscv_hwprobe syscall on a system with more than 8 CPUs
> when the supplied cpu mask is empty. Address this by fully initializing
> the cpu mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
This should have a fixes tag, I think it's:
Fixes: e178bf146e4b ("RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus flag")
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> index 1659d31fd288..caf6762427c8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static int hwprobe_get_cpus(struct riscv_hwprobe __user *pairs,
> if (cpusetsize > cpumask_size())
> cpusetsize = cpumask_size();
>
> + cpumask_clear(&cpus);
> ret = copy_from_user(&cpus, cpus_user, cpusetsize);
> if (ret)
> return -EFAULT;
cpus is on the stack, and is copied back out at the end of the function,
so this looks like it could be a stack info leak.
But the copy back is also bounded by cpusetsize, so in fact there is not
any leak of uninitialised stack out to userspace:
ret = copy_to_user(cpus_user, &cpus, cpusetsize);
if (ret)
return -EFAULT;
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@kernel.org>
cheers
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@kernel.org>
To: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: hwprobe: Avoid uninitialized read in hwprobe_get_cpus()
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:05:09 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <77749c92-ac8a-4074-bb59-59dbbd3d84f2@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612045502.70850-1-mark.hsj@gmail.com>
On 12/6/26 2:55 pm, Mark Harris wrote:
> When cpusetsize < cpumask_size(), hwprobe_get_cpus() did not fully
> initialize its copy of the cpu mask, which could cause non-deterministic
> results from the riscv_hwprobe syscall on a system with more than 8 CPUs
> when the supplied cpu mask is empty. Address this by fully initializing
> the cpu mask.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Harris <mark.hsj@gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
This should have a fixes tag, I think it's:
Fixes: e178bf146e4b ("RISC-V: hwprobe: Introduce which-cpus flag")
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> index 1659d31fd288..caf6762427c8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/sys_hwprobe.c
> @@ -450,6 +450,7 @@ static int hwprobe_get_cpus(struct riscv_hwprobe __user *pairs,
> if (cpusetsize > cpumask_size())
> cpusetsize = cpumask_size();
>
> + cpumask_clear(&cpus);
> ret = copy_from_user(&cpus, cpus_user, cpusetsize);
> if (ret)
> return -EFAULT;
cpus is on the stack, and is copied back out at the end of the function,
so this looks like it could be a stack info leak.
But the copy back is also bounded by cpusetsize, so in fact there is not
any leak of uninitialised stack out to userspace:
ret = copy_to_user(cpus_user, &cpus, cpusetsize);
if (ret)
return -EFAULT;
Reviewed-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@kernel.org>
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-16 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 4:55 [PATCH] riscv: hwprobe: Avoid uninitialized read in hwprobe_get_cpus() Mark Harris
2026-06-12 4:55 ` Mark Harris
2026-06-12 21:50 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-12 21:50 ` Nam Cao
2026-06-16 3:05 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2026-06-16 3:05 ` Michael Ellerman
2026-06-16 3:53 ` Mark Harris
2026-06-16 3:53 ` Mark Harris
2026-06-17 6:24 ` Michael Ellerman
2026-06-17 6:24 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=77749c92-ac8a-4074-bb59-59dbbd3d84f2@kernel.org \
--to=mpe@kernel.org \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.hsj@gmail.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.