* BUG: HTB?
@ 2005-04-21 19:21 Asim Shankar
2005-04-21 19:56 ` Thomas Graf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Asim Shankar @ 2005-04-21 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev
Hi,
I think there is a bug in htb_enqueue() (net/sched/sch_htb.c)
Specifically, in the lines:
if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
/* enqueue to helper queue */
if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
__skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
q->direct_pkts++;
}
}
If a packet is classified as HTB_DIRECT but the direct_queue is
already full, then the packet doesn't get enqueued but sch->q.qlen++
will happen a few lines later. Overflowing of the direct_queue
probably rarely happens in practice, but I was playing around and
noticed it happen in some corner cases of my testing.
Should the packet be dropped instead? Like:
if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
/* enqueue to helper queue */
if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
__skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
q->direct_pkts++;
} else {
sch->qstats.drops++;
kfree_skb(skb);
return NET_XMIT_DROP;
}
}
Thanks,
-- Asim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: BUG: HTB?
2005-04-21 19:21 BUG: HTB? Asim Shankar
@ 2005-04-21 19:56 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-21 20:41 ` [PATCH] - sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue overflows Asim Shankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Graf @ 2005-04-21 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Asim Shankar; +Cc: netdev
Hi,
* Asim Shankar <7bca1cb50504211221655fd54c@mail.gmail.com> 2005-04-21 14:21
> Specifically, in the lines:
> if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
> /* enqueue to helper queue */
> if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
> __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
> q->direct_pkts++;
> }
> }
>
> If a packet is classified as HTB_DIRECT but the direct_queue is
> already full, then the packet doesn't get enqueued but sch->q.qlen++
> will happen a few lines later. Overflowing of the direct_queue
> probably rarely happens in practice, but I was playing around and
> noticed it happen in some corner cases of my testing.
Yes, that's a bug.
> Should the packet be dropped instead? Like:
>
> if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
> /* enqueue to helper queue */
> if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
> __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
> q->direct_pkts++;
> } else {
> sch->qstats.drops++;
> kfree_skb(skb);
> return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> }
> }
Can you send a patch?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH] - sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue overflows
2005-04-21 19:56 ` Thomas Graf
@ 2005-04-21 20:41 ` Asim Shankar
2005-04-21 21:54 ` Thomas Graf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Asim Shankar @ 2005-04-21 20:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Thomas Graf; +Cc: netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1334 bytes --]
> > If a packet is classified as HTB_DIRECT but the direct_queue is
> > already full, then the packet doesn't get enqueued but sch->q.qlen++
> > will happen a few lines later. Overflowing of the direct_queue
> > probably rarely happens in practice, but I was playing around and
> > noticed it happen in some corner cases of my testing.
>
> Yes, that's a bug.
>
> > Should the packet be dropped instead? Like:
> >
> > if (cl == HTB_DIRECT) {
> > /* enqueue to helper queue */
> > if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
> > __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
> > q->direct_pkts++;
> > } else {
> > sch->qstats.drops++;
> > kfree_skb(skb);
> > return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> > }
> > }
>
> Can you send a patch?
>
Patched pasted and attached:
--- linux-2.6.11.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-07 13:57:45.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11.7-new/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-21 14:17:36.272065816 -0500
@@ -717,6 +717,10 @@
if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
__skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
q->direct_pkts++;
+ } else {
+ kfree_skb (skb);
+ sch->qstats.drops++;
+ return NET_XMIT_DROP;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
} else if (!cl) {
[-- Attachment #2: patch-htb-2.6.11.7 --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 436 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.11.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-07 13:57:45.000000000 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11.7-new/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-21 14:17:36.272065816 -0500
@@ -717,6 +717,10 @@
if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
__skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
q->direct_pkts++;
+ } else {
+ kfree_skb (skb);
+ sch->qstats.drops++;
+ return NET_XMIT_DROP;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
} else if (!cl) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] - sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue overflows
2005-04-21 20:41 ` [PATCH] - sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue overflows Asim Shankar
@ 2005-04-21 21:54 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.11.7] sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue is full Asim Shankar
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Graf @ 2005-04-21 21:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Asim Shankar; +Cc: netdev, devik
[CCed Martin Devera]
* Asim Shankar <7bca1cb505042113417a5d9f59@mail.gmail.com> 2005-04-21 15:41
> Patched pasted and attached:
For patch formatting details see http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html
A short description of the patch would be helpful.
Besides of that...
Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>
> --- linux-2.6.11.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-07 13:57:45.000000000 -0500
> +++ linux-2.6.11.7-new/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-21 14:17:36.272065816 -0500
> @@ -717,6 +717,10 @@
> if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
> __skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
> q->direct_pkts++;
> + } else {
> + kfree_skb (skb);
Could you write this without the whitespace?
> + sch->qstats.drops++;
> + return NET_XMIT_DROP;
> }
> #ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
> } else if (!cl) {
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 2.6.11.7] sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue is full
2005-04-21 21:54 ` Thomas Graf
@ 2005-04-21 23:02 ` Asim Shankar
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Asim Shankar @ 2005-04-21 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: devik, Thomas Graf
htb_enqueue(): Free skb and return NET_XMIT_DROP if a packet is
destined for the direct_queue but the direct_queue is full. (Before
this: erroneously returned NET_XMIT_SUCCESS even though the packet was
not enqueued)
Signed-off-by: Asim Shankar <asimshankar@gmail.com>
--- linux-2.6.11.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c.orig 2005-04-21 17:40:05.305709014 -0500
+++ linux-2.6.11.7/net/sched/sch_htb.c 2005-04-21 17:35:27.872624173 -0500
@@ -717,6 +717,10 @@ static int htb_enqueue(struct sk_buff *s
if (q->direct_queue.qlen < q->direct_qlen) {
__skb_queue_tail(&q->direct_queue, skb);
q->direct_pkts++;
+ } else {
+ kfree_skb(skb);
+ sch->qstats.drops++;
+ return NET_XMIT_DROP;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
} else if (!cl) {
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-21 23:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2005-04-21 19:21 BUG: HTB? Asim Shankar
2005-04-21 19:56 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-21 20:41 ` [PATCH] - sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue overflows Asim Shankar
2005-04-21 21:54 ` Thomas Graf
2005-04-21 23:02 ` [PATCH 2.6.11.7] sch_htb: Drop packet when direct queue is full Asim Shankar
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.