From: khilman@kernel.org (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200")
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> writes:
> Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a ?crit :
>> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error
>> prevents from probing devices correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes")
>> Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org # 4.1
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>
> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>
> This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so
> it's not exactly a regression.
>
> So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but
> it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request
> (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet).
>
> So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this
> single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material?
I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series.
> BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/
Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork
collects acks automatically as well. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches
<ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof-nZhT3qVonbNeoWH0uzbU5w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
alexandre.belloni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200")
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> writes:
> Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
>> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error
>> prevents from probing devices correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes")
>> Cc: stable-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org # 4.1
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre-AIFe0yeh4nAAvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
>
> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>
> This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so
> it's not exactly a regression.
>
> So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but
> it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request
> (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet).
>
> So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this
> single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material?
I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series.
> BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/
Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork
collects acks automatically as well. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 18:57:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5576BBFD.2060605@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:12:13 +0200")
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> writes:
> Le 08/06/2015 15:55, Ludovic Desroches a écrit :
>> The xdmac channel configuration is done in one cell not two. This error
>> prevents from probing devices correctly.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
>> Fixes: 83906783b766 ("ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: add aes, sha and tdes nodes")
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.1
>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
>
> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>
> This patch is a fix concerning material that had been added to 4.1, so
> it's not exactly a regression.
>
> So, as we missed the last train to 4.1, I'd like to queue it for 4.2 but
> it's the only patch I have on top of my previous DT pull-request
> (at91-dt4, not taken by you, yet).
>
> So, should I build another pull-request (at91-dt5) or can you take this
> single patch when you pull the at91-dt4 material?
I've applied it to next/dt after pulling your dt4 series.
> BTW, here is the link to patchwork if it's easier:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6565591/
Yes, that's helpful. I'm a big fan of 'pwclient git-am', and patchwork
collects acks automatically as well. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 1:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 13:55 [PATCH] ARM: at91/dt: sama5d4: fix dma conf for aes, sha and tdes nodes Ludovic Desroches
2015-06-08 13:55 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-06-08 13:55 ` Ludovic Desroches
2015-06-09 10:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-09 10:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-09 10:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-06-11 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2015-06-11 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-06-11 1:57 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7h8ubrgg6q.fsf@deeprootsystems.com \
--to=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.