All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	kishon@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
	quic_nsekar@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:37:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81dfd162-84c1-4f34-b1f0-459ad88a62df@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6RUX3ZbDbd3qvjs@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>

On 06/02/2025 07:19, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/02/2025 16:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2025 16:35, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 {
>>>>>>>>  				status = "disabled";
>>>>>>>>  			};
>>>>>>>>  		};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +		pcie1: pcie@18000000 {
>>>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>>>>>>> +			reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who
>>>>>>> should run tests for you. It's you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order
>>>>>> specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your
>>>>> reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people.
>>>>
>>>> I ran the tests. Not sure which portions to paste. Have attached the full
>>>> output just in case you are interested in some other detail. Please take a
>>>> look.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Varada
>>>>
>>>> 	$ grep ipq.*dtb dtbs-check.log
>>>
>>> Where is the command you have used?
> 
> 	export ARCH=arm64
> 	export W=1
> 	export DT_CHECKER_FLAGS='-v -m'
> 	export DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom
> 	export CHECK_DTBS=y
> 
> 	make -j 16 dtbs_check &> dtbs-check.log
> 

No flags for DTC as I asked.

>> Although that might not matter - you skipped several warnings with your
>> grep. So maybe you need to fix your process, not sure.
> 
> export W=1 is the problem. Kernel Makefile differentiates between 'W' being
> set from environment and from command line with this check

So just don't export. Command is:
make W=1 -j8 dtbs_check

> 
> 	ifeq ("$(origin W)", "command line")
> 	  KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN := $(W)
> 	endif
> 
> I assumed similar to DT_SCHEMA_FILES and DT_CHECKER_FLAGS, W will also be
> taken. I was not aware of this differentiation, and the 'export W=1' never
> came into effect. I re-ran the command as below and see the warnings
> 
> 	$ make W=1 -j 16 dtbs_check &> dtbs-check2.log
> 
> 	$ grep Warning dtbs-check2.log | grep ipq.*dt
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi:523.24-625.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/pcie@18000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "88000"
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi:627.24-729.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/pcie@20000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "80000"

Oh look! What surprise, who could expect that...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
	manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
	krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
	kishon@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
	p.zabel@pengutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
	quic_nsekar@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
	Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>,
	Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 08:37:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <81dfd162-84c1-4f34-b1f0-459ad88a62df@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6RUX3ZbDbd3qvjs@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>

On 06/02/2025 07:19, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 04:54:38PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 05/02/2025 16:53, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 05/02/2025 16:35, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Feb 05, 2025 at 02:47:13PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>> On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 {
>>>>>>>>  				status = "disabled";
>>>>>>>>  			};
>>>>>>>>  		};
>>>>>>>> +
>>>>>>>> +		pcie1: pcie@18000000 {
>>>>>>>> +			compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>>>>>>> +			reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who
>>>>>>> should run tests for you. It's you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order
>>>>>> specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here.
>>>>>
>>>>> I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your
>>>>> reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people.
>>>>
>>>> I ran the tests. Not sure which portions to paste. Have attached the full
>>>> output just in case you are interested in some other detail. Please take a
>>>> look.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> Varada
>>>>
>>>> 	$ grep ipq.*dtb dtbs-check.log
>>>
>>> Where is the command you have used?
> 
> 	export ARCH=arm64
> 	export W=1
> 	export DT_CHECKER_FLAGS='-v -m'
> 	export DT_SCHEMA_FILES=qcom
> 	export CHECK_DTBS=y
> 
> 	make -j 16 dtbs_check &> dtbs-check.log
> 

No flags for DTC as I asked.

>> Although that might not matter - you skipped several warnings with your
>> grep. So maybe you need to fix your process, not sure.
> 
> export W=1 is the problem. Kernel Makefile differentiates between 'W' being
> set from environment and from command line with this check

So just don't export. Command is:
make W=1 -j8 dtbs_check

> 
> 	ifeq ("$(origin W)", "command line")
> 	  KBUILD_EXTRA_WARN := $(W)
> 	endif
> 
> I assumed similar to DT_SCHEMA_FILES and DT_CHECKER_FLAGS, W will also be
> taken. I was not aware of this differentiation, and the 'export W=1' never
> came into effect. I re-ran the command as below and see the warnings
> 
> 	$ make W=1 -j 16 dtbs_check &> dtbs-check2.log
> 
> 	$ grep Warning dtbs-check2.log | grep ipq.*dt
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi:523.24-625.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/pcie@18000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "88000"
> 	arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5332.dtsi:627.24-729.5: Warning (simple_bus_reg): /soc@0/pcie@20000000: simple-bus unit address format error, expected "80000"

Oh look! What surprise, who could expect that...

Best regards,
Krzysztof

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-06  7:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-01-28  6:27 [PATCH v9 0/7] Add PCIe support for Qualcomm IPQ5332 Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,uniphy-pcie: Document PCIe uniphy Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] phy: qcom: Introduce PCIe UNIPHY 28LP driver Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Use sdx55 reg description for ipq9574 Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-03 16:44   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-03 16:44     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Reorder reg and reg-names Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ5332 PCIe controller Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  7:27   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28  7:27     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-03 16:30   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-03 16:30     ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 10:49     ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 10:49       ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 13:47       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 13:47         ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:35         ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 15:35           ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 15:53           ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:53             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:54             ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:54               ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-06  6:19               ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-06  6:19                 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-06  7:37                 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-02-06  7:37                   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28  6:27 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332-rdp441: Enable PCIe phys and controllers Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28  6:27   ` Varadarajan Narayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=81dfd162-84c1-4f34-b1f0-459ad88a62df@kernel.org \
    --to=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
    --cc=kishon@kernel.org \
    --cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
    --cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_nsekar@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_varada@quicinc.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.