From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
quic_nsekar@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85f54baa-7d3d-43c3-9944-8f5f3c3006da@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6NCSo98YRgG666Q@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + pcie1: pcie@18000000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>> + reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>,
>>
>> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who
>> should run tests for you. It's you.
>
> This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order
> specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of
Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here.
I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your
reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, lpieralisi@kernel.org, kw@linux.com,
manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org, robh@kernel.org,
krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org, vkoul@kernel.org,
kishon@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, konradybcio@kernel.org,
p.zabel@pengutronix.de, dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org,
quic_nsekar@quicinc.com, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-phy@lists.infradead.org,
Praveenkumar I <quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2025 14:47:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <85f54baa-7d3d-43c3-9944-8f5f3c3006da@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z6NCSo98YRgG666Q@hu-varada-blr.qualcomm.com>
On 05/02/2025 11:49, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 03, 2025 at 05:30:32PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28/01/2025 07:27, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
>>>
>>> @@ -479,6 +519,230 @@ frame@b128000 {
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>> };
>>> +
>>> + pcie1: pcie@18000000 {
>>> + compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq5332", "qcom,pcie-ipq9574";
>>> + reg = <0x00088000 0x3000>,
>>
>> So as Konrad pointed out now, this was never tested. It's not we who
>> should run tests for you. It's you.
>
> This was tested and it did not flag an error since it is having the order
> specified in the bindings. qcom,pcie.yaml has 4 reg specifications. Two of
Hm, then please paste results of dtbs_check W=1 testing. Here.
I am 100% sure you have there warning and I don't understand your
reluctance to run the tests even after pointing it out by two people.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
--
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-05 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-28 6:27 [PATCH v9 0/7] Add PCIe support for Qualcomm IPQ5332 Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,uniphy-pcie: Document PCIe uniphy Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] phy: qcom: Introduce PCIe UNIPHY 28LP driver Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Use sdx55 reg description for ipq9574 Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-03 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-02-03 16:44 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq9574: Reorder reg and reg-names Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the IPQ5332 PCIe controller Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 7:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28 7:27 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332: Add PCIe related nodes Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-03 16:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-03 16:30 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 10:49 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 10:49 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 13:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski [this message]
2025-02-05 13:47 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:35 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 15:35 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-05 15:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-05 15:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-06 6:19 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-06 6:19 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-02-06 7:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-02-06 7:37 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-01-28 6:27 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5332-rdp441: Enable PCIe phys and controllers Varadarajan Narayanan
2025-01-28 6:27 ` Varadarajan Narayanan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=85f54baa-7d3d-43c3-9944-8f5f3c3006da@kernel.org \
--to=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=andersson@kernel.org \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=quic_ipkumar@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_nsekar@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_varada@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.