From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864133911.4806.1414681896478.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028105458.GA9768@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@linux.intel.com>, "Ross Zwisler" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, "lttng-dev"
> <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:54:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > FYI, the main reason why my customer wants to go with a
> > "trace into memory that survives soft reboot" approach
> > rather than to use things like kexec/kdump is that they
> > care about the amount of time it takes to reboot their
> > machines. They want a solution where they can extract the
> > detailed crash data after reboot, after the machine is
> > back online, rather than requiring a few minutes of offline
> > time to extract the crash details.
>
> IIRC, on x86 there's no guarantee that your memory content will be
> preserved over reboot. BIOS is free to mess with it.
Hi Kirill,
This is a good point,
There are a few more aspects to consider here:
- Other architectures appear to have different guarantees, for
instance ARM which, AFAIK, does not reset memory on soft
reboot (well at least for my customer's boards). So I guess
if x86 wants to be competitive, it would be good for them to
offer a similar feature,
- Already having a subset of machines supporting this is useful,
e.g. storing trace buffers and recovering them after a crash,
- Since we are in a world of dynamically upgradable BIOS, perhaps
if we can show that there is value in having a BIOS option to
specify a memory range that should not be reset on soft reboot,
BIOS vendors might be inclined to include an option for it,
- Perhaps UEFI BIOS already have some way of specifying that a
memory range should not be reset on soft reboot ?
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Subject: Re: Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:11:36 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864133911.4806.1414681896478.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141028105458.GA9768@node.dhcp.inet.fi>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>
> To: "Mathieu Desnoyers" <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox" <willy@linux.intel.com>, "Ross Zwisler" <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>, "lttng-dev"
> <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 6:54:58 AM
> Subject: Re: Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem
>
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 12:51:25PM +0000, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > FYI, the main reason why my customer wants to go with a
> > "trace into memory that survives soft reboot" approach
> > rather than to use things like kexec/kdump is that they
> > care about the amount of time it takes to reboot their
> > machines. They want a solution where they can extract the
> > detailed crash data after reboot, after the machine is
> > back online, rather than requiring a few minutes of offline
> > time to extract the crash details.
>
> IIRC, on x86 there's no guarantee that your memory content will be
> preserved over reboot. BIOS is free to mess with it.
Hi Kirill,
This is a good point,
There are a few more aspects to consider here:
- Other architectures appear to have different guarantees, for
instance ARM which, AFAIK, does not reset memory on soft
reboot (well at least for my customer's boards). So I guess
if x86 wants to be competitive, it would be good for them to
offer a similar feature,
- Already having a subset of machines supporting this is useful,
e.g. storing trace buffers and recovering them after a crash,
- Since we are in a world of dynamically upgradable BIOS, perhaps
if we can show that there is value in having a BIOS option to
specify a memory range that should not be reset on soft reboot,
BIOS vendors might be inclined to include an option for it,
- Perhaps UEFI BIOS already have some way of specifying that a
memory range should not be reset on soft reboot ?
Thoughts ?
Thanks,
Mathieu
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-10-30 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1254279794.1957.1414240389301.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
2014-10-25 12:51 ` Progress on system crash traces with LTTng using DAX and pmem Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-10-25 12:51 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-10-27 18:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-10-27 18:48 ` Matthew Wilcox
2014-10-30 15:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-10-30 15:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-01-25 14:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-01-25 14:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-10-28 10:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-10-28 10:54 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2014-10-30 15:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2014-10-30 15:11 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2014-12-13 11:48 ` Matt Fleming
2014-12-13 11:48 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=864133911.4806.1414681896478.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.