All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andre.przywara@arm.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:07:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wpde83xn.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485479100-4966-6-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu> (Jintack Lim's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:04:55 -0500")

On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:55 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer with the default irq number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/reset.c         | 9 ++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c       | 9 ++++++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 3 ++-
>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c    | 9 +++++++--
>  4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> index 4b5e802..1da8b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
>  	.usr_regs.ARM_cpsr = SVC_MODE | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_ptimer_irq = {
> +	{ .irq = 30 },
> +	.level = 1,
> +};

At some point, we'll have to make that discoverable/configurable. Maybe
the time for a discoverable arch timer has come (see below).

> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_vtimer_irq = {
>  	{ .irq = 27 },
>  	.level = 1,
> @@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_regs *reset_regs;
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	case KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A7:
> @@ -65,6 +71,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		reset_regs = &cortexa_regs_reset;
>  		vcpu->arch.midr = read_cpuid_id();
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &cortexa_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &cortexa_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -77,5 +84,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_reset_coprocs(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset arch_timer context */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index e95d4f6..d9e9697 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@
>  			COMPAT_PSR_I_BIT | COMPAT_PSR_F_BIT),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level default_ptimer_irq = {
> +	.irq	= 30,
> +	.level	= 1,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level default_vtimer_irq = {
>  	.irq	= 27,
>  	.level	= 1,
> @@ -104,6 +109,7 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  	const struct kvm_regs *cpu_reset;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
> @@ -117,6 +123,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &default_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &default_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,5 +137,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset timer */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 69f648b..a364593 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu {
>  int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq);
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq);
>  void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index f72005a..0f6e935 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -329,9 +329,11 @@ void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq)
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq)
>  {
>  	struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> +	struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The vcpu timer irq number cannot be determined in
> @@ -339,7 +341,8 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * kvm_vcpu_set_target(). To handle this, we determine
>  	 * vcpu timer irq number when the vcpu is reset.
>  	 */
> -	vtimer->irq.irq = irq->irq;
> +	vtimer->irq.irq = virt_irq->irq;
> +	ptimer->irq.irq = phys_irq->irq;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The bits in CNTV_CTL are architecturally reset to UNKNOWN for ARMv8
> @@ -348,6 +351,7 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * the ARMv7 architecture.
>  	 */
>  	vtimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
> +	ptimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
>  	kvm_timer_update_state(vcpu);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -369,6 +373,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
>  
>  	update_vtimer_cntvoff(vcpu, kvm_phys_timer_read());
> +	vcpu_ptimer(vcpu)->cntvoff = 0;

This is quite contentious, IMHO. Do we really want to expose the delta
between the virtual and physical counters? That's a clear indication to
the guest that it is virtualized. I"m not sure it matters, but I think
we should at least make a conscious choice, and maybe give the
opportunity to userspace to select the desired behaviour.

>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&timer->expired, kvm_timer_inject_irq_work);
>  	hrtimer_init(&timer->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: marc.zyngier@arm.com (Marc Zyngier)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC v2 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:07:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wpde83xn.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485479100-4966-6-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu> (Jintack Lim's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:04:55 -0500")

On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:55 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer with the default irq number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/reset.c         | 9 ++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c       | 9 ++++++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 3 ++-
>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c    | 9 +++++++--
>  4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> index 4b5e802..1da8b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
>  	.usr_regs.ARM_cpsr = SVC_MODE | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_ptimer_irq = {
> +	{ .irq = 30 },
> +	.level = 1,
> +};

At some point, we'll have to make that discoverable/configurable. Maybe
the time for a discoverable arch timer has come (see below).

> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_vtimer_irq = {
>  	{ .irq = 27 },
>  	.level = 1,
> @@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_regs *reset_regs;
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	case KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A7:
> @@ -65,6 +71,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		reset_regs = &cortexa_regs_reset;
>  		vcpu->arch.midr = read_cpuid_id();
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &cortexa_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &cortexa_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -77,5 +84,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_reset_coprocs(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset arch_timer context */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index e95d4f6..d9e9697 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@
>  			COMPAT_PSR_I_BIT | COMPAT_PSR_F_BIT),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level default_ptimer_irq = {
> +	.irq	= 30,
> +	.level	= 1,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level default_vtimer_irq = {
>  	.irq	= 27,
>  	.level	= 1,
> @@ -104,6 +109,7 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  	const struct kvm_regs *cpu_reset;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
> @@ -117,6 +123,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &default_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &default_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,5 +137,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset timer */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 69f648b..a364593 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu {
>  int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq);
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq);
>  void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index f72005a..0f6e935 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -329,9 +329,11 @@ void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq)
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq)
>  {
>  	struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> +	struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The vcpu timer irq number cannot be determined in
> @@ -339,7 +341,8 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * kvm_vcpu_set_target(). To handle this, we determine
>  	 * vcpu timer irq number when the vcpu is reset.
>  	 */
> -	vtimer->irq.irq = irq->irq;
> +	vtimer->irq.irq = virt_irq->irq;
> +	ptimer->irq.irq = phys_irq->irq;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The bits in CNTV_CTL are architecturally reset to UNKNOWN for ARMv8
> @@ -348,6 +351,7 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * the ARMv7 architecture.
>  	 */
>  	vtimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
> +	ptimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
>  	kvm_timer_update_state(vcpu);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -369,6 +373,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
>  
>  	update_vtimer_cntvoff(vcpu, kvm_phys_timer_read());
> +	vcpu_ptimer(vcpu)->cntvoff = 0;

This is quite contentious, IMHO. Do we really want to expose the delta
between the virtual and physical counters? That's a clear indication to
the guest that it is virtualized. I"m not sure it matters, but I think
we should at least make a conscious choice, and maybe give the
opportunity to userspace to select the desired behaviour.

>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&timer->expired, kvm_timer_inject_irq_work);
>  	hrtimer_init(&timer->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
To: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
Cc: <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
	<christoffer.dall@linaro.org>, <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	<andre.przywara@arm.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer
Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:07:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86wpde83xn.fsf@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1485479100-4966-6-git-send-email-jintack@cs.columbia.edu> (Jintack Lim's message of "Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:04:55 -0500")

On Fri, Jan 27 2017 at 01:04:55 AM, Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu> wrote:
> Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer with the default irq number.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jintack Lim <jintack@cs.columbia.edu>
> ---
>  arch/arm/kvm/reset.c         | 9 ++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c       | 9 ++++++++-
>  include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h | 3 ++-
>  virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c    | 9 +++++++--
>  4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> index 4b5e802..1da8b2d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -37,6 +37,11 @@
>  	.usr_regs.ARM_cpsr = SVC_MODE | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_ptimer_irq = {
> +	{ .irq = 30 },
> +	.level = 1,
> +};

At some point, we'll have to make that discoverable/configurable. Maybe
the time for a discoverable arch timer has come (see below).

> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level cortexa_vtimer_irq = {
>  	{ .irq = 27 },
>  	.level = 1,
> @@ -58,6 +63,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	struct kvm_regs *reset_regs;
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
>  	case KVM_ARM_TARGET_CORTEX_A7:
> @@ -65,6 +71,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		reset_regs = &cortexa_regs_reset;
>  		vcpu->arch.midr = read_cpuid_id();
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &cortexa_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &cortexa_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	default:
>  		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -77,5 +84,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_reset_coprocs(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset arch_timer context */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> index e95d4f6..d9e9697 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,11 @@
>  			COMPAT_PSR_I_BIT | COMPAT_PSR_F_BIT),
>  };
>  
> +static const struct kvm_irq_level default_ptimer_irq = {
> +	.irq	= 30,
> +	.level	= 1,
> +};
> +
>  static const struct kvm_irq_level default_vtimer_irq = {
>  	.irq	= 27,
>  	.level	= 1,
> @@ -104,6 +109,7 @@ int kvm_arch_dev_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
>  	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_vtimer_irq;
> +	const struct kvm_irq_level *cpu_ptimer_irq;
>  	const struct kvm_regs *cpu_reset;
>  
>  	switch (vcpu->arch.target) {
> @@ -117,6 +123,7 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		}
>  
>  		cpu_vtimer_irq = &default_vtimer_irq;
> +		cpu_ptimer_irq = &default_ptimer_irq;
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -130,5 +137,5 @@ int kvm_reset_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
>  
>  	/* Reset timer */
> -	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq);
> +	return kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(vcpu, cpu_vtimer_irq, cpu_ptimer_irq);
>  }
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> index 69f648b..a364593 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_arch_timer.h
> @@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ struct arch_timer_cpu {
>  int kvm_timer_enable(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_init(struct kvm *kvm);
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq);
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq);
>  void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_flush_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> index f72005a..0f6e935 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/arch_timer.c
> @@ -329,9 +329,11 @@ void kvm_timer_sync_hwstate(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  }
>  
>  int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> -			 const struct kvm_irq_level *irq)
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *virt_irq,
> +			 const struct kvm_irq_level *phys_irq)
>  {
>  	struct arch_timer_context *vtimer = vcpu_vtimer(vcpu);
> +	struct arch_timer_context *ptimer = vcpu_ptimer(vcpu);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The vcpu timer irq number cannot be determined in
> @@ -339,7 +341,8 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * kvm_vcpu_set_target(). To handle this, we determine
>  	 * vcpu timer irq number when the vcpu is reset.
>  	 */
> -	vtimer->irq.irq = irq->irq;
> +	vtimer->irq.irq = virt_irq->irq;
> +	ptimer->irq.irq = phys_irq->irq;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The bits in CNTV_CTL are architecturally reset to UNKNOWN for ARMv8
> @@ -348,6 +351,7 @@ int kvm_timer_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * the ARMv7 architecture.
>  	 */
>  	vtimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
> +	ptimer->cnt_ctl = 0;
>  	kvm_timer_update_state(vcpu);
>  
>  	return 0;
> @@ -369,6 +373,7 @@ void kvm_timer_vcpu_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	struct arch_timer_cpu *timer = &vcpu->arch.timer_cpu;
>  
>  	update_vtimer_cntvoff(vcpu, kvm_phys_timer_read());
> +	vcpu_ptimer(vcpu)->cntvoff = 0;

This is quite contentious, IMHO. Do we really want to expose the delta
between the virtual and physical counters? That's a clear indication to
the guest that it is virtualized. I"m not sure it matters, but I think
we should at least make a conscious choice, and maybe give the
opportunity to userspace to select the desired behaviour.

>  
>  	INIT_WORK(&timer->expired, kvm_timer_inject_irq_work);
>  	hrtimer_init(&timer->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_ABS);

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-29 12:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 127+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-27  1:04 [RFC v2 00/10] Provide the EL1 physical timer to the VM Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 01/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Abstract virtual timer context into separate structure Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 11:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 11:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 11:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 02/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Move cntvoff to each timer context Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 11:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 11:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 11:54     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 14:45     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:45       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:45       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:51       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 14:51         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 14:51         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:40         ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:40           ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:40           ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:58     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:58       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:58       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 18:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:05         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:45         ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 18:45           ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 03/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Decouple kvm timer functions from virtual timer Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 12:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 12:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 12:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:17     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:17       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 14:49   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:49     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:49     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 17:18     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:18       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:18       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Add the EL1 physical timer context Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 05/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Initialize the emulated EL1 physical timer Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 12:07   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2017-01-29 12:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 12:07     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 14:58     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:58       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 14:58       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 17:44       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:44         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 19:04         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 19:04           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 19:04           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 10:08           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:08             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:08             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 06/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Update the physical timer interrupt level Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 15:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:21     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 15:02     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 15:02       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 17:50       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:50         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:50         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:41         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 18:41           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 18:48           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:48             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 18:48             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 19:06             ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 19:06               ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-30 19:06               ` Christoffer Dall
2017-01-31 17:00               ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-31 17:00                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-31 17:00                 ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01  8:02                 ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:02                   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:02                   ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:04     ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:04       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:04       ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01  8:40       ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-01  8:40         ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-01  8:40         ` Jintack Lim
2017-02-01 10:07         ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 10:07           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 10:07           ` Christoffer Dall
2017-02-01 10:17           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:17             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:17             ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:01       ` Marc Zyngier
2017-02-01 10:01         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 07/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Set a background timer to the earliest timer expiration Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 08/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Set up a background timer for the physical timer emulation Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04 ` [RFC v2 09/10] KVM: arm64: Add the EL1 physical timer access handler Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:04   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:05 ` [RFC v2 10/10] KVM: arm/arm64: Emulate the EL1 phys timer register access Jintack Lim
2017-01-27  1:05   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 15:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:44     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:08     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:08       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:08       ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:26       ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-30 17:26         ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-30 17:26         ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-30 17:35         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:35           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:35           ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 17:38         ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:38           ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 17:38           ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-29 15:55 ` [RFC v2 00/10] Provide the EL1 physical timer to the VM Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-29 15:55   ` Marc Zyngier
2017-01-30 19:02   ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 19:02     ` Jintack Lim
2017-01-30 19:02     ` Jintack Lim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86wpde83xn.fsf@arm.com \
    --to=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=jintack@cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.