From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ath11k: Register mhi controller device for qca6390
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:19:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rnp4lc7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512071323.GI4928@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (Manivannan Sadhasivam's message of "Tue, 12 May 2020 12:43:23 +0530")
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:03:56PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>> > config ATH11K_PCI
>> > tristate "Qualcomm Technologies 802.11ax chipset PCI support"
>> > - depends on ATH11K && PCI
>> > + depends on ATH11K && PCI && MHI_BUS
>> > ---help---
>> > This module adds support for PCIE bus
>>
>> Currently ATH11K_PCI is not visible if MHI_BUS is disabled, which I'm
>> worried will confuse the users. I wonder if we should use 'select
>> MHI_BUS' instead? That way ATH11K_PCI would be visible even if MHI_BUS
>> is disabled.
>>
>
> Right, this sounds good to me.
Good, I added that in the pending branch.
>> And what about QRTR_MHI? Mani, any suggestions?
>>
>
> Are you asking for Kconfig dependency? If yes, then you need to select it here
> also as you can't do much without it.
Ok, I added QRTR_MHI to Kconfig as well I also had to add "select MHI"
as othwerwise I would get this warning:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for QRTR_MHI
Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && QRTR [=n] && MHI_BUS [=m]
Selected by [m]:
- ATH11K_PCI [=m] && NETDEVICES [=y] && WLAN [=y] && WLAN_VENDOR_ATH [=y] && ATH11K [=m] && PCI [=y]
So now Kconfig looks like:
config ATH11K_PCI
tristate "Qualcomm Technologies 802.11ax chipset PCI support (work in-progress)"
depends on ATH11K && PCI
select MHI_BUS
select QRTR
select QRTR_MHI
---help---
This module adds support for PCIE bus
Govind&Mani, please check my changes in the pending branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=5ebf69d1db8b027671b642e3ba0bec3d7c73acb7
> Btw, I'm not CCed for the patch so I haven't looked at it.
This patchset is in my pending branch, link above.
> But we have made few changes to the MHI stack which will impact the
> controller drivers.
Oh, that will create problems. What kind of changes are needed in
ath11k?
> So I'd suggest you to rebase MHI controller patch on top of mhi-next
> [1]. The proposed changes in MHI will hopefully land in 5.8.
I cannot rebase on top mhi-next as my patches go through net-next. One
option I can think of is that I'll pull (not rebase!) mhi-next to my
tree, but I would need to check with David Miller first and I'm not sure
if it's worth the trouble. I think easiest is that we find minimal
possible changes needed to accommodate the new MHI interface and then
inform Linus and Stephen when do the merges.
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/mhi.git/log/?h=mhi-next
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
_______________________________________________
ath11k mailing list
ath11k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
Cc: Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ath11k: Register mhi controller device for qca6390
Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 11:19:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871rnp4lc7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200512071323.GI4928@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (Manivannan Sadhasivam's message of "Tue, 12 May 2020 12:43:23 +0530")
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org> writes:
> Hi Kalle,
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 09:03:56PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
>>
>> Govind Singh <govinds@codeaurora.org> writes:
>>
>> > config ATH11K_PCI
>> > tristate "Qualcomm Technologies 802.11ax chipset PCI support"
>> > - depends on ATH11K && PCI
>> > + depends on ATH11K && PCI && MHI_BUS
>> > ---help---
>> > This module adds support for PCIE bus
>>
>> Currently ATH11K_PCI is not visible if MHI_BUS is disabled, which I'm
>> worried will confuse the users. I wonder if we should use 'select
>> MHI_BUS' instead? That way ATH11K_PCI would be visible even if MHI_BUS
>> is disabled.
>>
>
> Right, this sounds good to me.
Good, I added that in the pending branch.
>> And what about QRTR_MHI? Mani, any suggestions?
>>
>
> Are you asking for Kconfig dependency? If yes, then you need to select it here
> also as you can't do much without it.
Ok, I added QRTR_MHI to Kconfig as well I also had to add "select MHI"
as othwerwise I would get this warning:
WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for QRTR_MHI
Depends on [n]: NET [=y] && QRTR [=n] && MHI_BUS [=m]
Selected by [m]:
- ATH11K_PCI [=m] && NETDEVICES [=y] && WLAN [=y] && WLAN_VENDOR_ATH [=y] && ATH11K [=m] && PCI [=y]
So now Kconfig looks like:
config ATH11K_PCI
tristate "Qualcomm Technologies 802.11ax chipset PCI support (work in-progress)"
depends on ATH11K && PCI
select MHI_BUS
select QRTR
select QRTR_MHI
---help---
This module adds support for PCIE bus
Govind&Mani, please check my changes in the pending branch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/ath.git/commit/?h=pending&id=5ebf69d1db8b027671b642e3ba0bec3d7c73acb7
> Btw, I'm not CCed for the patch so I haven't looked at it.
This patchset is in my pending branch, link above.
> But we have made few changes to the MHI stack which will impact the
> controller drivers.
Oh, that will create problems. What kind of changes are needed in
ath11k?
> So I'd suggest you to rebase MHI controller patch on top of mhi-next
> [1]. The proposed changes in MHI will hopefully land in 5.8.
I cannot rebase on top mhi-next as my patches go through net-next. One
option I can think of is that I'll pull (not rebase!) mhi-next to my
tree, but I would need to check with David Miller first and I'm not sure
if it's worth the trouble. I think easiest is that we find minimal
possible changes needed to accommodate the new MHI interface and then
inform Linus and Stephen when do the merges.
> [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mani/mhi.git/log/?h=mhi-next
--
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-12 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-08 8:58 [PATCH 0/4] Add PCI client driver for QCA6390 chipset Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` [PATCH 1/4] ath11k: " Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` Govind Singh
2020-05-11 17:59 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 17:59 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 5:31 ` govinds
2020-05-12 5:31 ` govinds
2020-05-08 8:58 ` [PATCH 2/4] ath11k: setup pci resource for QCA6390 target Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` [PATCH 3/4] ath11k: Add msi config init for QCA6390 Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` [PATCH 4/4] ath11k: Register mhi controller device for qca6390 Govind Singh
2020-05-08 8:58 ` Govind Singh
2020-05-11 18:03 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 18:03 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 7:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-12 7:13 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-12 8:19 ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2020-05-12 8:19 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 8:24 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 8:24 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-12 9:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-12 9:00 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-11 18:08 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-11 18:08 ` Kalle Valo
2020-05-15 3:28 ` Carl Huang
2020-05-15 3:28 ` Carl Huang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871rnp4lc7.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
--to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ath11k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=govinds@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.