Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	 Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	 Michael Walle <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	 Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
	 Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	 Steam Lin <STLin2@winbond.com>, Santhosh Kumar K <s-k6@ti.com>,
	 linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 5/8] spi: spi-mem: Create a secondary read operation
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2025 15:19:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87345h6qz0.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aTonE4REBDfaWBQo@sirena.co.uk> (Mark Brown's message of "Thu, 11 Dec 2025 11:06:11 +0900")

On 11/12/2025 at 11:06:11 +09, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 05, 2025 at 08:38:56PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>
>> The choice of defining two variables named primary and secondary instead
>> of using an array of templates is on purpose, to simplify the reading. I
>> find less obvious the use of an array here but this is personal taste.
>
> This makes sense to me:
>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>
> Feel free to carry both these patches along with the rest of the
> series, if/when you do end up applying it a signed tag would probably be
> a good idea in case there's some collision with other SPI work.

Thanks a lot for the feedback.

Yes, when the series is considered ready, I'll take care of that tag.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/