From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Fix livepatch module re-patching issue
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:46:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87357ley7f.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230204172357.mbudvbtv7tc7vhf3@treble>
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:38:03PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> Fix a livepatch bug seen when reloading a patched module.
>>
>> This is the powerpc counterpart to Song Liu's fix for a similar issue on
>> x86:
>>
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20230121004945.697003-2-song@kernel.org
>>
>> Josh Poimboeuf (2):
>> powerpc/module_64: Improve restore_r2() return semantics
>> powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching
>>
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Ping? Any objections to this?
>
> The x86 counterpart to this is queued for 6.3, it would be nice if this
> also landed. We could take it through the livepatch tree if needed.
It's in my next since about a week. Sorry I forgot to send the
"accepted" emails (which I still don't have automated :/ ).
337251c7114e1 ("powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching")
cheers
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu <song@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Fix livepatch module re-patching issue
Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2023 11:46:12 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87357ley7f.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230204172357.mbudvbtv7tc7vhf3@treble>
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 07:38:03PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>> Fix a livepatch bug seen when reloading a patched module.
>>
>> This is the powerpc counterpart to Song Liu's fix for a similar issue on
>> x86:
>>
>> https://lkml.kernel.org/lkml/20230121004945.697003-2-song@kernel.org
>>
>> Josh Poimboeuf (2):
>> powerpc/module_64: Improve restore_r2() return semantics
>> powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching
>>
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Ping? Any objections to this?
>
> The x86 counterpart to this is queued for 6.3, it would be nice if this
> also landed. We could take it through the livepatch tree if needed.
It's in my next since about a week. Sorry I forgot to send the
"accepted" emails (which I still don't have automated :/ ).
337251c7114e1 ("powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching")
cheers
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-05 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 3:38 [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Fix livepatch module re-patching issue Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 3:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 3:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] powerpc/module_64: Improve restore_r2() return semantics Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 3:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 5:53 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 5:53 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 13:24 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-25 13:24 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 12:38 ` Miroslav Benes
2023-01-27 12:38 ` Miroslav Benes
2023-01-25 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] powerpc/module_64: Fix "expected nop" error on module re-patching Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 3:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 6:09 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 6:09 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 16:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 16:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 17:36 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 17:36 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 18:53 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-01-25 18:58 ` Song Liu
2023-01-25 13:31 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-25 13:31 ` Petr Mladek
2023-01-27 12:50 ` Miroslav Benes
2023-01-27 12:50 ` Miroslav Benes
2023-01-27 13:48 ` [PATCH 0/2] powerpc: Fix livepatch module re-patching issue Joe Lawrence
2023-01-27 13:48 ` Joe Lawrence
2023-02-04 17:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-04 17:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-05 0:46 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
2023-02-05 0:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-02-05 16:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-05 16:21 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-02-05 0:46 ` Michael Ellerman
2023-02-05 0:46 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87357ley7f.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.