All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Cc: Steve deRosier <derosier@cal-sierra.com>,
	Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>,
	Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix incorrect multicast/broadcast rate setting
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:28:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736mzuvbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3062143.B1lnfLpWcE@bentobox> (Sven Eckelmann's message of "Tue,  26 Feb 2019 10:23:30 +0100")

Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> writes:

> On Monday, 25 February 2019 21:00:38 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> Tested-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
>> 
>> Was tested on QCA988X with 10.2.4-1.0-00041
>
> I just wanted to test it with 802.11s setup on IPQ4019 with 10.4-3.5.3-00057 
> and QCA9888 with 10.4-3.5.3-00053 (ath10k-firmware) and 10.4-3.6-00140
> (linux-firmware 2018-12-16-211de167) for both. But it looks like the firmware 
> always crashes with and without this patch and 11s.
>
>     [  221.620803] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: wmi command 36967 timeout, restarting hardware
>     [  221.744056] ieee80211 phy0: Hardware restart was requested
>     [  225.130829] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive control response completion, polling..
>     [  226.170824] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Service connect timeout
>     [  226.170871] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to connect htt (-110)
>     [  226.252248] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Could not init core: -110
>
> If i count correctly, this is WMI_10_4_GPIO_CONFIG_CMDID. Not really supported 
> by upstream but it looks like there is an Openwrt private patch (not yet
> accepted upstream [1])
>
>   package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ath/974-ath10k_add-LED-and-GPIO-controlling-support-for-various-chipsets.patch 
>
> which I have now removed to fix this problem for me.
>
> The tests with 10.4-3.6-00140 and 10.4-3.5.3-* worked fine without this patch.
>
> @Kalle are you expecting that he resents the patch again or can you just 
> append this information to the commit message? At least it looks at the moment 
> like there will be no new patch in the near future. But the 
> commit cd93b83ad92 ("ath10k: support for multicast rate control") is breaking 
> real world setups.

I'm planning to apply this. I was not sure what you wanted to add to the
commit log but I changed to now what's below. Please let me know if you
want to change it.

    ath10k: fix incorrect multicast/broadcast rate setting
    
    Invalid rate code is sent to firmware when multicast rate value of 0 is
    sent to driver indicating disabled case, causing broken mesh path.
    so fix that.
    
    Tested on QCA9984 with firmware 10.4-3.6.1-00827
    
    Sven tested on IPQ4019 with 10.4-3.5.3-00057 and QCA9888 with 10.4-3.5.3-00053
    (ath10k-firmware) and 10.4-3.6-00140 (linux-firmware 2018-12-16-211de167).
    
    Fixes: cd93b83ad92 ("ath10k: support for multicast rate control")
    Co-developed-by: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
    Signed-off-by: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
    Signed-off-by: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>
    Tested-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
    Patchwork-Id: 10723033
    Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

-- 
Kalle Valo

_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
To: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
Cc: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>,
	Steve deRosier <derosier@cal-sierra.com>,
	Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath10k@lists.infradead.org,
	Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>,
	John Crispin <john@phrozen.org>,
	Sebastian Gottschall <s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: fix incorrect multicast/broadcast rate setting
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2019 15:28:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8736mzuvbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3062143.B1lnfLpWcE@bentobox> (Sven Eckelmann's message of "Tue, 26 Feb 2019 10:23:30 +0100")

Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> writes:

> On Monday, 25 February 2019 21:00:38 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> [...]
>> Tested-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
>> 
>> Was tested on QCA988X with 10.2.4-1.0-00041
>
> I just wanted to test it with 802.11s setup on IPQ4019 with 10.4-3.5.3-00057 
> and QCA9888 with 10.4-3.5.3-00053 (ath10k-firmware) and 10.4-3.6-00140
> (linux-firmware 2018-12-16-211de167) for both. But it looks like the firmware 
> always crashes with and without this patch and 11s.
>
>     [  221.620803] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: wmi command 36967 timeout, restarting hardware
>     [  221.744056] ieee80211 phy0: Hardware restart was requested
>     [  225.130829] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to receive control response completion, polling..
>     [  226.170824] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Service connect timeout
>     [  226.170871] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: failed to connect htt (-110)
>     [  226.252248] ath10k_pci 0000:01:00.0: Could not init core: -110
>
> If i count correctly, this is WMI_10_4_GPIO_CONFIG_CMDID. Not really supported 
> by upstream but it looks like there is an Openwrt private patch (not yet
> accepted upstream [1])
>
>   package/kernel/mac80211/patches/ath/974-ath10k_add-LED-and-GPIO-controlling-support-for-various-chipsets.patch 
>
> which I have now removed to fix this problem for me.
>
> The tests with 10.4-3.6-00140 and 10.4-3.5.3-* worked fine without this patch.
>
> @Kalle are you expecting that he resents the patch again or can you just 
> append this information to the commit message? At least it looks at the moment 
> like there will be no new patch in the near future. But the 
> commit cd93b83ad92 ("ath10k: support for multicast rate control") is breaking 
> real world setups.

I'm planning to apply this. I was not sure what you wanted to add to the
commit log but I changed to now what's below. Please let me know if you
want to change it.

    ath10k: fix incorrect multicast/broadcast rate setting
    
    Invalid rate code is sent to firmware when multicast rate value of 0 is
    sent to driver indicating disabled case, causing broken mesh path.
    so fix that.
    
    Tested on QCA9984 with firmware 10.4-3.6.1-00827
    
    Sven tested on IPQ4019 with 10.4-3.5.3-00057 and QCA9888 with 10.4-3.5.3-00053
    (ath10k-firmware) and 10.4-3.6-00140 (linux-firmware 2018-12-16-211de167).
    
    Fixes: cd93b83ad92 ("ath10k: support for multicast rate control")
    Co-developed-by: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
    Signed-off-by: Zhi Chen <zhichen@codeaurora.org>
    Signed-off-by: Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu <pradeepc@codeaurora.org>
    Tested-by: Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org>
    Patchwork-Id: 10723033
    Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

-- 
Kalle Valo

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-03 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-12-11  4:56 [PATCH] ath10k: fix incorrect multicast/broadcast rate setting Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2018-12-11  4:56 ` Pradeep Kumar Chitrapu
2018-12-11 19:22 ` Peter Oh
2018-12-11 19:22   ` Peter Oh
2019-02-07 14:42   ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-07 14:42     ` Kalle Valo
2019-02-25 20:00 ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-02-25 20:00   ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-02-26  9:23   ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-02-26  9:23     ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-04-03 12:28     ` Kalle Valo [this message]
2019-04-03 12:28       ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-03 13:04       ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-04-03 13:04         ` Sven Eckelmann
2019-04-29 14:43 ` Kalle Valo
2019-04-29 14:43 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8736mzuvbz.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ansuelsmth@gmail.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=derosier@cal-sierra.com \
    --cc=john@phrozen.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pradeepc@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=s.gottschall@newmedia-net.de \
    --cc=sven@narfation.org \
    --cc=zhichen@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.