From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>,
igor.b@beldev.am
Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] riscv: fix minor typos and style issues in XIP code
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 07:58:56 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ineeujz.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <609b889a-8bb1-d2b5-8de6-ddeec27cac04@kernel.org>
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org> writes:
> Thanks for fixing the threading, but, Conor's message:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260213-canteen-diffuser-5ecc80f264b4@spud/
>
> was exactly right. Folks who care about XIP support for RISC-V first need
> to send patches to fix it in mainline. These typo fixes should be rolled
> in to that series. Until that happens, I plan to keep the XIP removal
> patches queued.
>
> I also want to see the XIP folks participating in testing and reviewing
> upstream patches going forward to confirm that they don't break XIP
> support. Otherwise, the burden is just getting pushed to patch submitters
> and maintainers, most of whom probably don't care much about XIP. And
> there's a good chance that we'll just go through this cycle again in
> another few months.
I would be happy to take that responsibility, if there are users. But
that does not seem to be the case.
Nam
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>, Kunwu Chan <kunwu.chan@linux.dev>,
igor.b@beldev.am
Cc: Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com>, Zong Li <zong.li@sifive.com>,
Deepak Gupta <debug@rivosinc.com>,
Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@gmail.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] riscv: fix minor typos and style issues in XIP code
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 07:58:56 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ineeujz.fsf@yellow.woof> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <609b889a-8bb1-d2b5-8de6-ddeec27cac04@kernel.org>
Paul Walmsley <pjw@kernel.org> writes:
> Thanks for fixing the threading, but, Conor's message:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20260213-canteen-diffuser-5ecc80f264b4@spud/
>
> was exactly right. Folks who care about XIP support for RISC-V first need
> to send patches to fix it in mainline. These typo fixes should be rolled
> in to that series. Until that happens, I plan to keep the XIP removal
> patches queued.
>
> I also want to see the XIP folks participating in testing and reviewing
> upstream patches going forward to confirm that they don't break XIP
> support. Otherwise, the burden is just getting pushed to patch submitters
> and maintainers, most of whom probably don't care much about XIP. And
> there's a good chance that we'll just go through this cycle again in
> another few months.
I would be happy to take that responsibility, if there are users. But
that does not seem to be the case.
Nam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 0:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-14 2:38 [PATCH RESEND 0/2] riscv: fix minor typos and style issues in XIP code Kunwu Chan
2026-02-14 2:38 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-02-14 2:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/2] riscv: xip_fixup.h: fix comment typo and whitespace issue Kunwu Chan
2026-02-14 2:38 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-02-14 2:38 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/2] riscv: head.S: fix typo and wrong #endif comment Kunwu Chan
2026-02-14 2:38 ` Kunwu Chan
2026-02-17 21:12 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/2] riscv: fix minor typos and style issues in XIP code Paul Walmsley
2026-02-17 21:12 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-02-18 0:58 ` Nam Cao [this message]
2026-02-18 0:58 ` Nam Cao
2026-02-20 15:38 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-02-20 15:38 ` Jisheng Zhang
2026-02-20 22:39 ` Conor Dooley
2026-02-20 22:39 ` Conor Dooley
2026-03-18 23:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2026-03-18 23:23 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=874ineeujz.fsf@yellow.woof \
--to=namcao@linutronix.de \
--cc=alex@ghiti.fr \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@rivosinc.com \
--cc=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=debug@rivosinc.com \
--cc=igor.b@beldev.am \
--cc=kunwu.chan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=pjw@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouzhouyi@gmail.com \
--cc=zong.li@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.