Re: [PATCH v12 1/3] dt-bindings: mtd: Describe MTD partitions concatenation

[Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>]

On 12/02/2025 at 10:06:59 -06, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 09:25:53AM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> >> The partitions that gets created are
>> >> part0_0
>> >> part1_1
>> >> part0_1-part1_0-concat
>> >
>> > 'part-concat' doesn't work if you have multiple sets of partitions you 
>> > want to concatenate.
>> >
>> > I think you need something like 'prev-partition' or 'next-partition' in 
>> > the partition nodes to create a linked list of partitions. Hopefully, 
>> > you don't need both properties, but you do have to scan everything to 
>> > figure out which ones are concatenated or not. For example, no property 
>> > can mean not concatenated or last partition if you use 'next-partition'. 
>> 
>> Out of curiosity, would the chosen node be eligible as a central place
>> where to look at?
>
> Why would you need that?

I'm talking about storing in a central place all the concatenated
partitions. Your proposal with "next-partition" works fine if we locate
it inside the 'partitions' node, but I feel like the 'part-concat'
instead was not fitting very well there. So I was wondering in this case
if moving the concatenation of the partitions would be eligible to the
chosen node, or if that's reserved to *very* few properties (and should
remain like that).

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/