All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:57:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f4ngii5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c87e0d1-1f14-08bb-2a69-650788fba8dc@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:05:03 +0100")

Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:

> I was actually about to email you about this.
>
> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4).
>
> Then you can tweak it (v5).
>
> It is only minor updates to the HIF layer (added QCA9377 support) and
> a setup of some pll registers.

Ok, that sounds good. I'll wait for v4.

> btw, should I still mark them as RFC or should it be PATCH this time?
>
> If I go for PATCH, should the version be v4 or should I start from v1?

v4 would be fine. Thanks.

-- 
Kalle Valo
_______________________________________________
ath10k mailing list
ath10k@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Valo, Kalle" <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
To: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:57:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f4ngii5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1c87e0d1-1f14-08bb-2a69-650788fba8dc@gmail.com> (Erik Stromdahl's message of "Sat, 18 Feb 2017 23:05:03 +0100")

Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:

> I was actually about to email you about this.
>
> I have made a few more updates to the sdio code so I think it would be
> best if I could submit a new series of patches based on this code (v4).
>
> Then you can tweak it (v5).
>
> It is only minor updates to the HIF layer (added QCA9377 support) and
> a setup of some pll registers.

Ok, that sounds good. I'll wait for v4.

> btw, should I still mark them as RFC or should it be PATCH this time?
>
> If I go for PATCH, should the version be v4 or should I start from v1?

v4 would be fine. Thanks.

--=20
Kalle Valo=

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-18 23:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-13 21:26 [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 1/8] ath10k: htc: made static function public Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 2/8] ath10k: htc: rx trailer lookahead support Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 3/8] ath10k: htc: move htc ctrl ep connect to htc_init Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 4/8] ath10k: htc: refactorization Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 5/8] ath10k: various sdio related definitions Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 6/8] ath10k: sdio support Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 7/8] ath10k: sdio get target info Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26 ` [RFC v3 8/8] ath10k: htc: ready_ext msg support Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-13 21:26   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-01-23 11:08 ` [RFC v3 0/8] ath10k sdio support Valo, Kalle
2017-01-23 11:08   ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-18 13:40 ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-18 13:40   ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-18 22:05   ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-18 22:05     ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-18 23:57     ` Valo, Kalle [this message]
2017-02-18 23:57       ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 13:19       ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 13:52         ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 13:52           ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 14:05           ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 14:05             ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 16:30             ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 16:30               ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 13:59       ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 13:59         ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 16:21         ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 16:21           ` Erik Stromdahl
2017-02-19 16:33           ` Valo, Kalle
2017-02-19 16:33             ` Valo, Kalle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=877f4ngii5.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \
    --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=erik.stromdahl@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.