From: gregory.clement@free-electrons.com (Gregory CLEMENT)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 09/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup soc DT warning
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:38:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f81b013.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161118101248.784eff2b@free-electrons.com> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:48 +0100")
Hi Thomas,
On ven., nov. 18 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:01:32 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> >> + soc at f00100000000 {
>> >
>> > Where is this value coming from? Why does the soc node needs to have a
>>
>> It cames from the dts files.
>
> Where?
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-375-db.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-375-db.dts
@@ -63,7 +63,11 @@
reg = <0x00000000 0x40000000>; /* 1 GB */
};
- soc {
+ /* The following unit address is composed of the target
+ * value (bit [40-47]), attributes value (bits [32-39],
+ * and the address value in the window memory: [0-31].
+ */
+ soc at f00100000000 {
ranges = <MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01) 0 0xf1000000 0x100000
just here ---------^
MBUS_ID(0x01, 0x1d) 0 0xfff00000 0x100000
MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x09) 0 0xf1100000 0x10000
>
>> > unit address? It doesn't have a 'reg' property if I remember
>> > correctly.
>>
>> But it has a range property.
>
> And? There are multiple ranges, and you randomly took the first one for
> the unit address of the soc node?
Not randomly I followed the same rules that for the regs mentioned in
the ePAPR paragraph 2.2.1.1:
"The unit-address should match the first address specified in the reg
property of the node."
>
> You realize that the ranges property is a list of ranges, and they
> could be in any order? Why would you pick the base address of one of
> the ranges rather than any of the others?
It is the same for the regs so as explained I followed the same rules.
>
> I believe there is simply no unit address for the soc {} node. There is
> definitely one for the internal-regs {} node, but not for the soc {}
> node.
It is not the interpretation of the DTC:
"Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc has a reg or ranges property,
but no unit name"
Gregory
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Thomas Petazzoni
<thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup soc DT warning
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:38:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877f81b013.fsf@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161118101248.784eff2b-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> (Thomas Petazzoni's message of "Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:12:48 +0100")
Hi Thomas,
On ven., nov. 18 2016, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 18 Nov 2016 10:01:32 +0100, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>
>> >> + soc@f00100000000 {
>> >
>> > Where is this value coming from? Why does the soc node needs to have a
>>
>> It cames from the dts files.
>
> Where?
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-375-db.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/armada-375-db.dts
@@ -63,7 +63,11 @@
reg = <0x00000000 0x40000000>; /* 1 GB */
};
- soc {
+ /* The following unit address is composed of the target
+ * value (bit [40-47]), attributes value (bits [32-39],
+ * and the address value in the window memory: [0-31].
+ */
+ soc@f00100000000 {
ranges = <MBUS_ID(0xf0, 0x01) 0 0xf1000000 0x100000
just here ---------^
MBUS_ID(0x01, 0x1d) 0 0xfff00000 0x100000
MBUS_ID(0x09, 0x09) 0 0xf1100000 0x10000
>
>> > unit address? It doesn't have a 'reg' property if I remember
>> > correctly.
>>
>> But it has a range property.
>
> And? There are multiple ranges, and you randomly took the first one for
> the unit address of the soc node?
Not randomly I followed the same rules that for the regs mentioned in
the ePAPR paragraph 2.2.1.1:
"The unit-address should match the first address specified in the reg
property of the node."
>
> You realize that the ranges property is a list of ranges, and they
> could be in any order? Why would you pick the base address of one of
> the ranges rather than any of the others?
It is the same for the regs so as explained I followed the same rules.
>
> I believe there is simply no unit address for the soc {} node. There is
> definitely one for the internal-regs {} node, but not for the soc {}
> node.
It is not the interpretation of the DTC:
"Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc has a reg or ranges property,
but no unit name"
Gregory
>
> Best regards,
>
> Thomas
> --
> Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
> Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
> http://free-electrons.com
--
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-18 9:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-17 23:08 [PATCH v3 00/13] Various Armada 375 DT warning fixup Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Add node labels Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Use the " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup mdio DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup bootrom " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup devbus " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup sa-ram " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 8:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 8:59 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 12:06 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 12:06 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 13:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 13:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup pcie DT warnings Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup pinctrl " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup soc DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 8:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 8:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 9:01 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 9:01 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 9:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 9:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 9:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT [this message]
2016-11-18 9:38 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-18 13:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-18 13:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup internal-regs " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Remove skeleton.dtsi Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup memory DT warning Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` [PATCH v3 13/13] ARM: dts: armada-375: Fixup ethernet child " Gregory CLEMENT
2016-11-17 23:08 ` Gregory CLEMENT
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877f81b013.fsf@free-electrons.com \
--to=gregory.clement@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.