From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately)
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:09:45 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gud4ybi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120704105533.GB21704@redhat.com>
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:55:33 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:17:46AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case
> > > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in
> > > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple
> > > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to
> > > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.
> >
> > It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :(
> >
> > I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree,
> > otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your
> > push before pushing to Linus next merge window.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
>
> While theoretical mine is a bugfix so could be 3.5 material, no?
It's a little thin, but it's a good idea. I'll try.
Cheers,
Rusty.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately)
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 09:09:45 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877gud4ybi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120704105533.GB21704@redhat.com>
On Wed, 4 Jul 2012 13:55:33 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 03, 2012 at 10:17:46AM +0930, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case
> > > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in
> > > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple
> > > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to
> > > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work.
> >
> > It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :(
> >
> > I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree,
> > otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your
> > push before pushing to Linus next merge window.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Rusty.
>
> While theoretical mine is a bugfix so could be 3.5 material, no?
It's a little thin, but it's a good idea. I'll try.
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-08 23:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <patchbomb.1320306168@localhost6.localdomain6>
2011-11-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 1 of 5] virtio: document functions better Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 7:49 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 2 of 5] virtio: rename virtqueue_add_buf_gfp to virtqueue_add_buf Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 7:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 3 of 5] virtio: support unlocked queue kick Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-04 10:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-11-04 10:09 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-11-04 10:36 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-04 10:36 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-04 10:36 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2011-11-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 4 of 5] virtio: avoid modulus operation Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-03 7:51 ` Pekka Enberg
2011-11-03 10:18 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 10:18 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately Rusty Russell
2011-11-03 7:42 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-13 21:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-13 21:03 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-14 0:43 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-14 0:43 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-14 0:43 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-14 6:56 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-16 0:21 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-16 7:18 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-21 1:48 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-21 11:57 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-22 0:33 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-22 6:29 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-11-23 1:19 ` Rusty Russell
2011-11-23 8:30 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 9:20 ` RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately) Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-01 9:20 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 1:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-02 1:05 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-02 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 7:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 16:08 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-02 16:08 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-03 0:47 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-03 16:26 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-03 16:26 ` Rafael Aquini
2012-07-04 10:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-04 10:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-08 23:39 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-07-08 23:39 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-04 10:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-04 10:55 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 7:33 ` [PATCH RFC] virtio-balloon: fix add/get API use Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-02 7:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2012-07-04 3:27 ` Rusty Russell
2012-07-04 3:27 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877gud4ybi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.