All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	ast@kernel.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	android-mm@google.com, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, kernel-team@android.com,
	elver@google.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, andreyknvl@gmail.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:00:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a68wxkga.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-13-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:37:45 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> This can be used to disable stacktrace for the protected KVM
> nVHE hypervisor, in order to save on the associated memory usage.
> 
> This option is disabled by default, since protected KVM is not widely
> used on platforms other than Android currently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v6:
>   - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags
> 
> Changes in v5:
>   - Make PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE depend on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG, per Marc
> 
>  arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 8a5fbbf084df..09c995869916 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ menuconfig KVM
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE
> +	bool "Protected KVM hypervisor stacktraces"
> +	depends on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here to enable pKVM hypervisor stacktraces on hyp_panic()
> +
> +	  If you are not using protected nVHE (pKVM), say N.
> +
> +	  If using protected nVHE mode, but cannot afford the associated
> +	  memory cost (less than 0.75 page per CPU) of pKVM stacktraces,
> +	  say N.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
>  	bool "Debug mode for non-VHE EL2 object"
>  	depends on KVM

Having NVHE_EL2_DEBUG after PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE is pretty odd
when you use 'make menuconfig', as the new option appears out of
sequence.

I'll move it around, no need to respin for this.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:00:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a68wxkga.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-13-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:37:45 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> This can be used to disable stacktrace for the protected KVM
> nVHE hypervisor, in order to save on the associated memory usage.
> 
> This option is disabled by default, since protected KVM is not widely
> used on platforms other than Android currently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v6:
>   - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags
> 
> Changes in v5:
>   - Make PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE depend on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG, per Marc
> 
>  arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 8a5fbbf084df..09c995869916 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ menuconfig KVM
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE
> +	bool "Protected KVM hypervisor stacktraces"
> +	depends on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here to enable pKVM hypervisor stacktraces on hyp_panic()
> +
> +	  If you are not using protected nVHE (pKVM), say N.
> +
> +	  If using protected nVHE mode, but cannot afford the associated
> +	  memory cost (less than 0.75 page per CPU) of pKVM stacktraces,
> +	  say N.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
>  	bool "Debug mode for non-VHE EL2 object"
>  	depends on KVM

Having NVHE_EL2_DEBUG after PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE is pretty odd
when you use 'make menuconfig', as the new option appears out of
sequence.

I'll move it around, no need to respin for this.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org,
	madvenka@linux.microsoft.com, tabba@google.com,
	oliver.upton@linux.dev, will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com,
	james.morse@arm.com, alexandru.elisei@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	andreyknvl@gmail.com, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	elver@google.com, keirf@google.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	ardb@kernel.org, oupton@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	android-mm@google.com, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2022 11:00:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a68wxkga.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220726073750.3219117-13-kaleshsingh@google.com>

On Tue, 26 Jul 2022 08:37:45 +0100,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com> wrote:
> 
> This can be used to disable stacktrace for the protected KVM
> nVHE hypervisor, in order to save on the associated memory usage.
> 
> This option is disabled by default, since protected KVM is not widely
> used on platforms other than Android currently.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> Tested-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v6:
>   - Add Fuad’s Reviewed-by and Tested-by tags
> 
> Changes in v5:
>   - Make PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE depend on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG, per Marc
> 
>  arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 8a5fbbf084df..09c995869916 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -46,6 +46,21 @@ menuconfig KVM
>  
>  	  If unsure, say N.
>  
> +config PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE
> +	bool "Protected KVM hypervisor stacktraces"
> +	depends on NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
> +	default n
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here to enable pKVM hypervisor stacktraces on hyp_panic()
> +
> +	  If you are not using protected nVHE (pKVM), say N.
> +
> +	  If using protected nVHE mode, but cannot afford the associated
> +	  memory cost (less than 0.75 page per CPU) of pKVM stacktraces,
> +	  say N.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
>  config NVHE_EL2_DEBUG
>  	bool "Debug mode for non-VHE EL2 object"
>  	depends on KVM

Having NVHE_EL2_DEBUG after PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE is pretty odd
when you use 'make menuconfig', as the new option appears out of
sequence.

I'll move it around, no need to respin for this.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-26 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 112+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-26  7:37 [PATCH v6 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 01/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add shared header for common stack unwinding code Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 02/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out on_accessible_stack_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:01   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:01     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 16:33     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 03/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out unwind_next_common() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 04/17] arm64: stacktrace: Handle frame pointer from different address spaces Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 14:34   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:34     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:34     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 15:30     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:30       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:30       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 05/17] arm64: stacktrace: Factor out common unwind() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 06/17] arm64: stacktrace: Add description of stacktrace/common.h Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 14:49   ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:49     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26 14:49     ` Mark Brown
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 07/17] KVM: arm64: On stack overflow switch to hyp overflow_stack Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 08/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of non-protected nVHE HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 09/17] KVM: arm64: Prepare non-protected nVHE hypervisor stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 16:26   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 10/17] KVM: arm64: Implement non-protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 11/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce hyp_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 12/17] KVM: arm64: Add PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE Kconfig Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 10:00   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-26 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 10:00     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-26 15:33     ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26 15:33       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 13/17] KVM: arm64: Allocate shared pKVM hyp stacktrace buffers Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 14/17] KVM: arm64: Stub implementation of pKVM HYP stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 15/17] KVM: arm64: Save protected-nVHE (pKVM) hyp stacktrace Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 16/17] KVM: arm64: Implement protected nVHE hyp stack unwinder Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37 ` [PATCH v6 17/17] KVM: arm64: Introduce pkvm_dump_backtrace() Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-26  7:37   ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 14:29   ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: nVHE stack unwinder rework Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 1/6] KVM: arm64: Move PROTECTED_NVHE_STACKTRACE around Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 2/6] KVM: arm64: Move nVHE stacktrace unwinding into its own compilation unit Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 3/6] KVM: arm64: Make unwind()/on_accessible_stack() per-unwinder functions Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:32       ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 17:32         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 17:32         ` Mark Brown
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 4/6] KVM: arm64: Move nVHE-only helpers into kvm/stacktrace.c Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 5/6] KVM: arm64: Don't open code ARRAY_SIZE() Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29     ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: Update 'unwinder howto' Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 14:29       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 15:56     ` [PATCH 0/6] KVM: arm64: nVHE stack unwinder rework Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 15:56       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 15:56       ` Kalesh Singh
2022-07-27 16:01     ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 16:01       ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 16:01       ` Oliver Upton
2022-07-27 17:45     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:45       ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44 ` [PATCH v6 00/17] KVM nVHE Hypervisor stack unwinder Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-27 17:44   ` Marc Zyngier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a68wxkga.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
    --cc=android-mm@google.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kaleshsingh@google.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.