From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"paul@pwsan.com" <paul@pwsan.com>, "Menon, Nishanth" <nm@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add few quick access functions
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:55:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aaaol3cd.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5F72A2.6000002@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:55:14 +0200")
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
> On 9/1/2011 12:23 AM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Provide a quick set of access functions:
>>> a) Convert omap_device to platform_device - This is the flip of
>>> to_omap_device for equivalent usage
>>> b) Convert omap_device to device pointer - This is useful for
>>> most devices that need to go through standard linux functions that
>>> take device pointer.
>>> c) Convert hwmod to device pointer - This wrapper provides ability for
>>> drivers to convert directly from hwmod name back to device pointer
>>> without having to handle this on a driver by driver basis
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>
>>> [b-cousson@ti.com: Adapt it to the new pdev pointer inside od]
>>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> index bdc2804..903f329 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> @@ -152,6 +152,21 @@ static inline struct omap_device *to_omap_device(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return pdev ? pdev->archdata.od : NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Convert omap_device to platform device pointer */
>>> +#define omap_device_get_pdev(x) ((x)->pdev)
>>> +/* Convert omap_device to device pointer */
>>> +#define omap_device_get_dev(x) (&omap_device_get_pdev(x)->dev)
>>
>> I don't see these used elsewhere, and I don't think they're needed...
>
> Well, there are used once... just below, and that's all.
>
>>> +/* Convert omap_hwmod name to device pointer */
>>> +static inline struct device *omap_hwmod_name_get_dev(const char *oh_name)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_device *od;
>>> + od = omap_hwmod_name_get_odev(oh_name);
>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(od))
>>> + return ERR_PTR(od ? PTR_ERR(od) : -ENODEV);
>>> + return omap_device_get_dev(od);
>>> +}
>>> +
>
> I will let Nishant comment, but I guess the idea was that an
> omap_device API should handle omap_device pointer, and then access to
> pdev or dev is done using these helpers.
>
> Assuming that now omap_device API should preferably use pdev, we can
> remove one step of indirection and thus get rid of the helpers, since
> they are not used anywhere else.
>
Yes please.
I've made most of the omap_device API now use pdev pointers already in
my series.
Thanks,
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add few quick access functions
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 07:55:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87aaaol3cd.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4E5F72A2.6000002@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Thu, 1 Sep 2011 13:55:14 +0200")
"Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
> On 9/1/2011 12:23 AM, Hilman, Kevin wrote:
>> Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com> writes:
>>
>>> From: Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>
>>>
>>> Provide a quick set of access functions:
>>> a) Convert omap_device to platform_device - This is the flip of
>>> to_omap_device for equivalent usage
>>> b) Convert omap_device to device pointer - This is useful for
>>> most devices that need to go through standard linux functions that
>>> take device pointer.
>>> c) Convert hwmod to device pointer - This wrapper provides ability for
>>> drivers to convert directly from hwmod name back to device pointer
>>> without having to handle this on a driver by driver basis
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon<nm@ti.com>
>>> [b-cousson at ti.com: Adapt it to the new pdev pointer inside od]
>>> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson<b-cousson@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> index bdc2804..903f329 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/omap_device.h
>>> @@ -152,6 +152,21 @@ static inline struct omap_device *to_omap_device(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> return pdev ? pdev->archdata.od : NULL;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +/* Convert omap_device to platform device pointer */
>>> +#define omap_device_get_pdev(x) ((x)->pdev)
>>> +/* Convert omap_device to device pointer */
>>> +#define omap_device_get_dev(x) (&omap_device_get_pdev(x)->dev)
>>
>> I don't see these used elsewhere, and I don't think they're needed...
>
> Well, there are used once... just below, and that's all.
>
>>> +/* Convert omap_hwmod name to device pointer */
>>> +static inline struct device *omap_hwmod_name_get_dev(const char *oh_name)
>>> +{
>>> + struct omap_device *od;
>>> + od = omap_hwmod_name_get_odev(oh_name);
>>> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(od))
>>> + return ERR_PTR(od ? PTR_ERR(od) : -ENODEV);
>>> + return omap_device_get_dev(od);
>>> +}
>>> +
>
> I will let Nishant comment, but I guess the idea was that an
> omap_device API should handle omap_device pointer, and then access to
> pdev or dev is done using these helpers.
>
> Assuming that now omap_device API should preferably use pdev, we can
> remove one step of indirection and thus get rid of the helpers, since
> they are not used anywhere else.
>
Yes please.
I've made most of the omap_device API now use pdev pointers already in
my series.
Thanks,
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-01 14:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-22 15:19 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add omap_hwmod_name_get_odev Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:20 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:48 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:48 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 20:44 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-09-01 20:44 ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-09-26 18:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-26 18:18 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add few quick access functions Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:55 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:55 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 14:55 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-09-01 14:55 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 12:39 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 12:39 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] OMAP3: beagle-board: Use the omap_hwmod_name_get_dev API Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:25 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAP2+: devices: Remove all omap_device_pm_latency structures Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:31 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:59 ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 16:28 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87aaaol3cd.fsf@ti.com \
--to=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.