All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
To: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: paul@pwsan.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:25:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3fl8bgs.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314026347-21623-6-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:19:05 +0200")

Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:

> Since the device pointer is now retrieved using the hwmod name, remove
> the static variables used to store the device pointers for DSP, MPU, IVA
> and L3 devices for PM/DVFS usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Looks fine,

Kevin

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c |   47 ++++++---------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index 17725d2..832577a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -26,38 +26,7 @@
>  
>  static struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats;
>  
> -static struct device *mpu_dev;
> -static struct device *iva_dev;
> -static struct device *l3_dev;
> -static struct device *dsp_dev;
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_mpuss_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpu_dev);
> -	return mpu_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_iva_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!iva_dev);
> -	return iva_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_l3_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!l3_dev);
> -	return l3_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap4_get_dsp_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dsp_dev);
> -	return dsp_dev;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap4_get_dsp_device);
> -
> -/* static int _init_omap_device(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user) */
> -static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
> +static int _init_omap_device(char *name)
>  {
>  	struct omap_hwmod *oh;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -72,8 +41,6 @@ static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
>  		 __func__, name))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	*new_dev = &pdev->dev;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -82,16 +49,16 @@ static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
>   */
>  static void omap2_init_processor_devices(void)
>  {
> -	_init_omap_device("mpu", &mpu_dev);
> +	_init_omap_device("mpu");
>  	if (omap3_has_iva())
> -		_init_omap_device("iva", &iva_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("iva");
>  
>  	if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> -		_init_omap_device("l3_main_1", &l3_dev);
> -		_init_omap_device("dsp", &dsp_dev);
> -		_init_omap_device("iva", &iva_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("l3_main_1");
> +		_init_omap_device("dsp");
> +		_init_omap_device("iva");
>  	} else {
> -		_init_omap_device("l3_main", &l3_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("l3_main");
>  	}
>  }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: khilman@ti.com (Kevin Hilman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:25:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d3fl8bgs.fsf@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1314026347-21623-6-git-send-email-b-cousson@ti.com> (Benoit Cousson's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2011 17:19:05 +0200")

Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com> writes:

> Since the device pointer is now retrieved using the hwmod name, remove
> the static variables used to store the device pointers for DSP, MPU, IVA
> and L3 devices for PM/DVFS usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>

Looks fine,

Kevin

> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c |   47 ++++++---------------------------------------
>  1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 40 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> index 17725d2..832577a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/pm.c
> @@ -26,38 +26,7 @@
>  
>  static struct omap_device_pm_latency *pm_lats;
>  
> -static struct device *mpu_dev;
> -static struct device *iva_dev;
> -static struct device *l3_dev;
> -static struct device *dsp_dev;
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_mpuss_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpu_dev);
> -	return mpu_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_iva_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!iva_dev);
> -	return iva_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap2_get_l3_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!l3_dev);
> -	return l3_dev;
> -}
> -
> -struct device *omap4_get_dsp_device(void)
> -{
> -	WARN_ON_ONCE(!dsp_dev);
> -	return dsp_dev;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL(omap4_get_dsp_device);
> -
> -/* static int _init_omap_device(struct omap_hwmod *oh, void *user) */
> -static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
> +static int _init_omap_device(char *name)
>  {
>  	struct omap_hwmod *oh;
>  	struct platform_device *pdev;
> @@ -72,8 +41,6 @@ static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
>  		 __func__, name))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> -	*new_dev = &pdev->dev;
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -82,16 +49,16 @@ static int _init_omap_device(char *name, struct device **new_dev)
>   */
>  static void omap2_init_processor_devices(void)
>  {
> -	_init_omap_device("mpu", &mpu_dev);
> +	_init_omap_device("mpu");
>  	if (omap3_has_iva())
> -		_init_omap_device("iva", &iva_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("iva");
>  
>  	if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
> -		_init_omap_device("l3_main_1", &l3_dev);
> -		_init_omap_device("dsp", &dsp_dev);
> -		_init_omap_device("iva", &iva_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("l3_main_1");
> +		_init_omap_device("dsp");
> +		_init_omap_device("iva");
>  	} else {
> -		_init_omap_device("l3_main", &l3_dev);
> +		_init_omap_device("l3_main");
>  	}
>  }

  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-31 22:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-22 15:19 [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 1/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add omap_hwmod_name_get_odev Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:20   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:20     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:48     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:48       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 20:44       ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-09-01 20:44         ` Menon, Nishanth
2011-09-26 18:18   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-26 18:18     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 2/7] OMAP: PM: omap_device: add few quick access functions Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:23   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:23     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:55     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:55       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 14:55       ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 14:55         ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-02 12:39     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-02 12:39       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 3/7] OMAP3: beagle-board: Use the omap_hwmod_name_get_dev API Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 4/7] OMAP2+: pm: Use hwmod name instead of dev pointer Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:24   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:24     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 5/7] OMAP2+: pm: Remove static devices variable for mpu, dsp, iva and l3 PM Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:25   ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2011-08-31 22:25     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 6/7] OMAP: omap_device: Create a default omap_device_pm_latency Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:30   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:30     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-22 15:19 ` [PATCH 7/7] OMAP2+: devices: Remove all omap_device_pm_latency structures Benoit Cousson
2011-08-22 15:19   ` Benoit Cousson
2011-08-31 22:31   ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-31 22:31     ` Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 11:59     ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 11:59       ` Cousson, Benoit
2011-09-01 16:28 ` [PATCH 0/7] OMAP: omap_device cleanup before device-tree integration Kevin Hilman
2011-09-01 16:28   ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d3fl8bgs.fsf@ti.com \
    --to=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.