From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Roman Beranek <romanberanek@icloud.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: uncouple DSI dotclock divider from TCON0_DCLK_REG
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkkc3bzc.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327202045.ceeqqwjug4ktxtsf@penduick>
Hi,
On 2023-03-27 at 22:20:45 +0200, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:40:04PM +0100, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
[...]
>> Actually, I had the following third patch prepared that adjusted the dotclock rate so that the
>> required PLL rate is set. But again, this seems very indirect, so that’s why I refrained from
>> submitting it and I submitted the linked patch above instead.
>>
>> Anyway, here is the third proposal:
>>
>> — a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> @@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>> regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
>> ⁃ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>> ⁃ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>> ⁃ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>> +{
>> ⁃ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
>> ⁃ /*
>> ⁃ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
>> ⁃ * number of lanes.
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * According to the BSP code:
>> ⁃ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
>> ⁃ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
>> ⁃ */
>> ⁃ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
>> ⁃ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
>> ⁃ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
>> ⁃ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
>> ⁃ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
>> ⁃ }
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ return true;
>> +}
>> ⁃ static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
>> @@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
>> static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
>> .disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
>> .enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
>> ⁃ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
>> };
>
> It's not clear to me what this patch is supposed to be doing, there's no mode_fixup implementation
> upstream?
>
Sorry, my mail client tried some fancy formatting. :(
This is the patch again.
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
}
+static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
+ /*
+ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
+ * number of lanes.
+ *
+ * According to the BSP code:
+ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
+ *
+ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
+ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
+ */
+ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
+ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
+ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
+
+ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
+ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
{
struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
@@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
.disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
.enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
+ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
};
static u32 sun6i_dsi_dcs_build_pkt_hdr(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
I still like the original patch better, but I'd be happy to submit this
as a proper patch, if this is more to your liking.
Thanks,
Frank
> Maxime
>
--
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Roman Beranek <romanberanek@icloud.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: uncouple DSI dotclock divider from TCON0_DCLK_REG
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkkc3bzc.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327202045.ceeqqwjug4ktxtsf@penduick>
Hi,
On 2023-03-27 at 22:20:45 +0200, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:40:04PM +0100, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
[...]
>> Actually, I had the following third patch prepared that adjusted the dotclock rate so that the
>> required PLL rate is set. But again, this seems very indirect, so that’s why I refrained from
>> submitting it and I submitted the linked patch above instead.
>>
>> Anyway, here is the third proposal:
>>
>> — a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> @@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>> regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
>> ⁃ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>> ⁃ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>> ⁃ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>> +{
>> ⁃ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
>> ⁃ /*
>> ⁃ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
>> ⁃ * number of lanes.
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * According to the BSP code:
>> ⁃ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
>> ⁃ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
>> ⁃ */
>> ⁃ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
>> ⁃ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
>> ⁃ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
>> ⁃ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
>> ⁃ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
>> ⁃ }
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ return true;
>> +}
>> ⁃ static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
>> @@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
>> static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
>> .disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
>> .enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
>> ⁃ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
>> };
>
> It's not clear to me what this patch is supposed to be doing, there's no mode_fixup implementation
> upstream?
>
Sorry, my mail client tried some fancy formatting. :(
This is the patch again.
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
}
+static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
+ /*
+ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
+ * number of lanes.
+ *
+ * According to the BSP code:
+ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
+ *
+ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
+ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
+ */
+ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
+ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
+ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
+
+ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
+ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
{
struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
@@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
.disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
.enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
+ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
};
static u32 sun6i_dsi_dcs_build_pkt_hdr(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
I still like the original patch better, but I'd be happy to submit this
as a proper patch, if this is more to your liking.
Thanks,
Frank
> Maxime
>
--
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Frank Oltmanns <frank@oltmanns.dev>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Cc: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
Roman Beranek <romanberanek@icloud.com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/sun4i: uncouple DSI dotclock divider from TCON0_DCLK_REG
Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bkkc3bzc.fsf@oltmanns.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230327202045.ceeqqwjug4ktxtsf@penduick>
Hi,
On 2023-03-27 at 22:20:45 +0200, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 12:40:04PM +0100, Frank Oltmanns wrote:
[...]
>> Actually, I had the following third patch prepared that adjusted the dotclock rate so that the
>> required PLL rate is set. But again, this seems very indirect, so that’s why I refrained from
>> submitting it and I submitted the linked patch above instead.
>>
>> Anyway, here is the third proposal:
>>
>> — a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
>> @@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
>> regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
>> }
>>
>> +static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
>> ⁃ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
>> ⁃ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
>> ⁃ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
>> +{
>> ⁃ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
>> ⁃ /*
>> ⁃ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
>> ⁃ * number of lanes.
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * According to the BSP code:
>> ⁃ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
>> ⁃ *
>> ⁃ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
>> ⁃ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
>> ⁃ */
>> ⁃ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
>> ⁃ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
>> ⁃ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
>> ⁃ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
>> ⁃ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
>> ⁃ }
>> ⁃
>>
>> ⁃ return true;
>> +}
>> ⁃ static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
>> {
>> struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
>> @@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
>> static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
>> .disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
>> .enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
>> ⁃ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
>> };
>
> It's not clear to me what this patch is supposed to be doing, there's no mode_fixup implementation
> upstream?
>
Sorry, my mail client tried some fancy formatting. :(
This is the patch again.
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun6i_mipi_dsi.c
@@ -819,6 +819,34 @@ static void sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable(struct drm_encoder *encoder)
regulator_disable(dsi->regulator);
}
+static bool sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup(
+ struct drm_encoder *encoder,
+ const struct drm_display_mode *mode,
+ struct drm_display_mode *adjusted_mode)
+{
+ if (encoder->encoder_type == DRM_MODE_ENCODER_DSI) {
+ /*
+ * For DSI the PLL rate has to respect the bits per pixel and
+ * number of lanes.
+ *
+ * According to the BSP code:
+ * PLL rate = DOTCLOCK * bpp / lanes
+ *
+ * Therefore, the clock has to be adjusted in order to set the
+ * correct PLL rate when actually setting the clock.
+ */
+ struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = encoder_to_sun6i_dsi(encoder);
+ struct mipi_dsi_device *device = dsi->device;
+ u8 bpp = mipi_dsi_pixel_format_to_bpp(device->format);
+ u8 lanes = device->lanes;
+
+ adjusted_mode->crtc_clock = mode->crtc_clock
+ * bpp / (lanes * SUN6I_DSI_TCON_DIV);
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static int sun6i_dsi_get_modes(struct drm_connector *connector)
{
struct sun6i_dsi *dsi = connector_to_sun6i_dsi(connector);
@@ -851,6 +879,7 @@ static const struct drm_connector_funcs sun6i_dsi_connector_funcs = {
static const struct drm_encoder_helper_funcs sun6i_dsi_enc_helper_funcs = {
.disable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_disable,
.enable = sun6i_dsi_encoder_enable,
+ .mode_fixup = sun6i_dsi_encoder_mode_fixup,
};
static u32 sun6i_dsi_dcs_build_pkt_hdr(struct sun6i_dsi *dsi,
I still like the original patch better, but I'd be happy to submit this
as a proper patch, if this is more to your liking.
Thanks,
Frank
> Maxime
>
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-28 19:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-20 16:16 [PATCH] drm/sun4i: uncouple DSI dotclock divider from TCON0_DCLK_REG Roman Beranek
2023-03-20 16:16 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-20 16:16 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-21 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-21 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-21 16:50 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 16:50 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 16:50 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 20:53 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 20:53 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-21 20:53 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-27 20:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-27 20:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-27 20:21 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-25 11:40 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-25 11:40 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-25 11:40 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-27 20:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-27 20:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-27 20:20 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-27 23:48 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-27 23:48 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-27 23:48 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-29 19:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-29 19:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-29 19:58 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-30 4:45 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-30 4:45 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-30 4:45 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-31 5:36 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-31 5:36 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-31 5:36 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-05 12:34 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-05 12:34 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-05 12:34 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-05 15:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-05 15:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-05 15:03 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-12 7:14 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-12 7:14 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-12 7:14 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-12 14:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-12 14:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-12 14:09 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-04-08 7:07 ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-04-08 7:07 ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-04-08 7:07 ` Jernej Škrabec
2023-04-12 1:22 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-12 1:22 ` Roman Beranek
2023-04-12 1:22 ` Roman Beranek
2023-03-28 19:28 ` Frank Oltmanns [this message]
2023-03-28 19:28 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-28 19:28 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-29 19:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-29 19:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-29 19:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2023-03-30 4:41 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-30 4:41 ` Frank Oltmanns
2023-03-30 4:41 ` Frank Oltmanns
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bkkc3bzc.fsf@oltmanns.dev \
--to=frank@oltmanns.dev \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
--cc=romanberanek@icloud.com \
--cc=samuel@sholland.org \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.