From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: "Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: "Poddar, Sourav" <sourav.poddar@ti.com>,
"gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"tony@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk" <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Balbi, Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>, "Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] driver: serial: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bo9myt52.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433ED96C45@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> (Vaibhav Bedia's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:56 +0000")
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Sourav,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
> [...]
>> Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
>>
>> But how exactly this gets used, I mean I don't see any drivers/ in mainline
>> making use of this compatible string "ti,am3352-ocmcram". ?
>
> OCMC clock is enabled during bootup (not sure whether that's the h/w
> default or ROM does it) since the initial bootloader runs from there.
> By marking the corresponding hwmod with HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE we leave the
> clock running. Right now the sram code under arch/arm/plat-omap/ is what
> manages the OCMC. I guess this needs to move somewhere under drivers/
> and start managing the clocks. Even then we'll need a mechanism
> to leave the clocks running as part of the kernel suspend process
> since the assembly code which runs at the fag end of the suspend
> process runs out of OCMC and hence we can't cut its clock.
>
> On AM335x, the OCMC clock is cut to have PER power domain transition
> but that's done in the WKUP-M3 firmware when going down. During the
> wakeup sequence, WKUP-M3 re-enables the OCMC clock so that when the
> kernel resumes the h/w state is same.
OK, but *today*, in *mainline*, where in the linux kernel (not the M3
firmware) is the OCMRAM clock cut during suspend?
>From what I can see, there is no driver for this device, so there are no
system PM calls being done for that device, and thus no omap_device
calls being done for that device, so the no_idle_on_suspend has no
effect.
Kevin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
To: "Bedia\, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>
Cc: "Poddar\, Sourav" <sourav.poddar@ti.com>,
"gregkh\@linuxfoundation.org" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"tony\@atomide.com" <tony@atomide.com>,
"rmk+kernel\@arm.linux.org.uk" <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-omap\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>,
"Shilimkar\, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, "Balbi\,
Felipe" <balbi@ti.com>, "Nayak\, Rajendra" <rnayak@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3] driver: serial: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend"
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:26:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bo9myt52.fsf@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B5906170F1614E41A8A28DE3B8D121433ED96C45@DBDE01.ent.ti.com> (Vaibhav Bedia's message of "Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:26:56 +0000")
"Bedia, Vaibhav" <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com> writes:
> Hi Sourav,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 15:13:44, Poddar, Sourav wrote:
> [...]
>> Yes, had a look at that and found your situation similar to UART.
>>
>> But how exactly this gets used, I mean I don't see any drivers/ in mainline
>> making use of this compatible string "ti,am3352-ocmcram". ?
>
> OCMC clock is enabled during bootup (not sure whether that's the h/w
> default or ROM does it) since the initial bootloader runs from there.
> By marking the corresponding hwmod with HWMOD_INIT_NO_IDLE we leave the
> clock running. Right now the sram code under arch/arm/plat-omap/ is what
> manages the OCMC. I guess this needs to move somewhere under drivers/
> and start managing the clocks. Even then we'll need a mechanism
> to leave the clocks running as part of the kernel suspend process
> since the assembly code which runs at the fag end of the suspend
> process runs out of OCMC and hence we can't cut its clock.
>
> On AM335x, the OCMC clock is cut to have PER power domain transition
> but that's done in the WKUP-M3 firmware when going down. During the
> wakeup sequence, WKUP-M3 re-enables the OCMC clock so that when the
> kernel resumes the h/w state is same.
OK, but *today*, in *mainline*, where in the linux kernel (not the M3
firmware) is the OCMRAM clock cut during suspend?
>From what I can see, there is no driver for this device, so there are no
system PM calls being done for that device, and thus no omap_device
calls being done for that device, so the no_idle_on_suspend has no
effect.
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-10 21:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-05 13:15 [PATCHv3] driver: serial: prevent UART console idle on suspend while using "no_console_suspend" Sourav Poddar
2013-04-05 13:15 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-05 17:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-05 17:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-09 18:54 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-09 18:54 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-09 19:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-09 19:07 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-10 6:07 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-10 6:07 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-10 6:19 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-10 9:43 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-10 11:26 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-10 21:26 ` Kevin Hilman [this message]
2013-04-10 21:26 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-11 14:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-11 14:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-15 11:50 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-04-15 21:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-15 21:33 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-04-15 11:55 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-08 17:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-10 5:27 ` Sourav Poddar
2013-04-10 5:27 ` Sourav Poddar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bo9myt52.fsf@linaro.org \
--to=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rnayak@ti.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=sourav.poddar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.