All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>Minas
	Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d100qwc5.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Hi,

Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>>>>>> Thanks for picking this for -next.
>>>>>> Is it better to have this in v4.16-rc fixes?
>>>>>> and also stable? v4.12+
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, there was no "Fixes: foobar" or "Cc: stable" lines in the commit
>>>>> log ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The best we can do now, is wait for -rc1 and manually send the commit to
>>>>> stable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's fine. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Same issue seen in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function where also used
>>> wait_event_lock_irq() - as result infinite loop.
>> 
>> how did this happen? During rmmod dwc3? Or, perhaps, after you unloaded
>> a gadget driver?
>> 
> No, not during rmmod's.
> We using our internal USB testing tool. Test case; ISOC OUT, transfer 
> size N frames. When host starts ISOC OUT traffic then the dwc3 based on 
> "Transfer not ready" event in frame F starts transfers staring from 
> frame F+4 (for bInterval=1) as result 4 requests, which already queued 
> on device side, remain incomplete. Function driver on some timeout 
> trying dequeue these 4 requests (without disabling EP) to complete test.
> For IN ISOC's these requests completed on MISSED ISOC event, but for 
> ISOC OUT required call dequeue on some timeout.

okay

>>> Actually to fix this issue I updated condition of wait function
>>> from:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING)
>>> to:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING & DWC3_EP_ENABLED)
>> 
>> you're not fixing anything. You're, essentially, removing the entire
>> end transfer pending logic. 
> yes, you are right, but how to overcome this infinite loop? Replace 
> wait_event_lock_irq() by  wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout()?

The best way here would be to figure why we're missing command complete
IRQ in those cases. According to documentation, we *should* receive that
interrupt, so why is it missing?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
	Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
	Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2018 10:54:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d100qwc5.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A560113ABBA4B@am04wembxa.internal.synopsys.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1951 bytes --]


Hi,

Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>>>>>> Thanks for picking this for -next.
>>>>>> Is it better to have this in v4.16-rc fixes?
>>>>>> and also stable? v4.12+
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, there was no "Fixes: foobar" or "Cc: stable" lines in the commit
>>>>> log ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> The best we can do now, is wait for -rc1 and manually send the commit to
>>>>> stable.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> That's fine. Thanks.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Same issue seen in dwc3_gadget_ep_dequeue() function where also used
>>> wait_event_lock_irq() - as result infinite loop.
>> 
>> how did this happen? During rmmod dwc3? Or, perhaps, after you unloaded
>> a gadget driver?
>> 
> No, not during rmmod's.
> We using our internal USB testing tool. Test case; ISOC OUT, transfer 
> size N frames. When host starts ISOC OUT traffic then the dwc3 based on 
> "Transfer not ready" event in frame F starts transfers staring from 
> frame F+4 (for bInterval=1) as result 4 requests, which already queued 
> on device side, remain incomplete. Function driver on some timeout 
> trying dequeue these 4 requests (without disabling EP) to complete test.
> For IN ISOC's these requests completed on MISSED ISOC event, but for 
> ISOC OUT required call dequeue on some timeout.

okay

>>> Actually to fix this issue I updated condition of wait function
>>> from:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING)
>>> to:
>>> !(dep->flags & DWC3_EP_END_TRANSFER_PENDING & DWC3_EP_ENABLED)
>> 
>> you're not fixing anything. You're, essentially, removing the entire
>> end transfer pending logic. 
> yes, you are right, but how to overcome this infinite loop? Replace 
> wait_event_lock_irq() by  wait_event_interruptible_lock_irq_timeout()?

The best way here would be to figure why we're missing command complete
IRQ in those cases. According to documentation, we *should* receive that
interrupt, so why is it missing?

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2018-03-19  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-03-19  8:54 Felipe Balbi [this message]
2018-03-19  8:54 ` [PATCH v2] usb: dwc3: Prevent indefinite sleep in _dwc3_set_mode during suspend/resume Felipe Balbi
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-04-10  7:31 [v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-04-10  7:31 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-04-10  6:29 [v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-04-10  6:29 ` [PATCH v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 13:53 [v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 13:53 ` [PATCH v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 11:36 [v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-19 11:36 ` [PATCH v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-17  6:33 [v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-17  6:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 12:25 [v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 12:25 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 11:43 [v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 11:43 ` [PATCH v2] " Minas Harutyunyan
2018-03-16 11:03 [v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 11:03 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 11:00 [v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 11:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-16 10:34 [v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-16 10:34 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 12:47 [v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 12:47 ` [PATCH v2] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-09 10:39 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 10:39 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 10:36 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09 10:36 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09  9:49 Roger Quadros
2018-03-09  9:49 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-09  9:26 Roger Quadros
2018-03-09  9:26 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-09  9:23 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09  9:23 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-09  9:19 Roger Quadros
2018-03-09  9:19 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:27 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:27 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:25 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:25 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:25 Baolin Wang
2018-03-05 11:25 ` [PATCH] " Baolin Wang
2018-03-05 11:14 Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:14 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:06 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:06 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05 11:03 Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 11:03 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-05 10:41 Baolin Wang
2018-03-05 10:41 ` [PATCH] " Baolin Wang
2018-03-05  9:45 Roger Quadros
2018-03-05  9:45 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-03-05  8:49 Felipe Balbi
2018-03-05  8:49 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-02-28  9:59 Roger Quadros
2018-02-28  9:59 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-02-28  9:55 Roger Quadros
2018-02-28  9:55 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros
2018-02-28  7:53 Felipe Balbi
2018-02-28  7:53 ` [PATCH] " Felipe Balbi
2018-02-28  3:04 Baolin Wang
2018-02-28  3:04 ` [PATCH] " Baolin Wang
2018-02-27 11:22 Roger Quadros
2018-02-27 11:22 ` [PATCH] " Roger Quadros

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d100qwc5.fsf@linux.intel.com \
    --to=balbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.