From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix not finding the VBT when it overlaps with OPREGION_ASLE_EXT
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:21:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1eqs0cs.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51453855-216b-1966-226f-b223badf61b7@redhat.com>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06-02-17 08:04, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> First, I want a big fat warning comment about what's going on
>> here. Otherwise someone's bound to "fix" this later on.
>
> Done for v2, which I will send shortly.
Thanks.
>> Second, per the spec, the ASLE ext mailbox is 1k in size, and there's a
>> 1k reserved region at the end. We probably shouldn't allow VBT to extend
>> over there. But hey, per the spec we also shouldn't allow VBT to extend
>> over mailbox #5 either. So if you can't be bothered with that, neither
>> will I.
>
> Hmm, that makes no sense, OPREGION_SIZE is 8192 bytes or 0x2000,
> OPREGION_ASLE_EXT_OFFSET is 0x1C00 or 7168 bytes, if there is 1k
> reserved after the ASLE ext mailbox then there is exactly 0 bytes
> available for the ASLE ext mailbox or OPREGION_SIZE should be 9216
> not 8192 (which I don't think so). Maybe the last 1k is either
> the ASLE ext mailbox OR reserved ?
You're quite right, that makes no sense. :) Looks like we account for
the reserved part at the end of struct opregion_asle_ext, but the spec
isn't quite clear whether the reserved part is actually part of the
mailbox or not. I'm not quite sure how I managed to confuse myself to
turn that into 1k. Sorry.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: "Hans de Goede" <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix not finding the VBT when it overlaps with OPREGION_ASLE_EXT
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 14:21:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1eqs0cs.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51453855-216b-1966-226f-b223badf61b7@redhat.com>
On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 06-02-17 08:04, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> First, I want a big fat warning comment about what's going on
>> here. Otherwise someone's bound to "fix" this later on.
>
> Done for v2, which I will send shortly.
Thanks.
>> Second, per the spec, the ASLE ext mailbox is 1k in size, and there's a
>> 1k reserved region at the end. We probably shouldn't allow VBT to extend
>> over there. But hey, per the spec we also shouldn't allow VBT to extend
>> over mailbox #5 either. So if you can't be bothered with that, neither
>> will I.
>
> Hmm, that makes no sense, OPREGION_SIZE is 8192 bytes or 0x2000,
> OPREGION_ASLE_EXT_OFFSET is 0x1C00 or 7168 bytes, if there is 1k
> reserved after the ASLE ext mailbox then there is exactly 0 bytes
> available for the ASLE ext mailbox or OPREGION_SIZE should be 9216
> not 8192 (which I don't think so). Maybe the last 1k is either
> the ASLE ext mailbox OR reserved ?
You're quite right, that makes no sense. :) Looks like we account for
the reserved part at the end of struct opregion_asle_ext, but the spec
isn't quite clear whether the reserved part is actually part of the
mailbox or not. I'm not quite sure how I managed to confuse myself to
turn that into 1k. Sorry.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-10 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-25 10:19 [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix not finding the VBT when it overlaps with OPREGION_ASLE_EXT Hans de Goede
2016-12-25 10:19 ` Hans de Goede
2016-12-27 10:58 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-27 10:58 ` Jani Nikula
2016-12-31 16:00 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-20 8:07 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-20 8:07 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-20 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-20 8:16 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 10:36 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 10:36 ` Jani Nikula
2017-01-23 16:04 ` Hans de Goede
2017-01-24 13:33 ` Jani Nikula
2017-02-04 13:51 ` Hans de Goede
2017-02-06 6:55 ` Jani Nikula
2017-02-06 7:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-02-06 7:04 ` Jani Nikula
2017-02-10 10:52 ` Hans de Goede
2017-02-10 10:52 ` Hans de Goede
2017-02-10 12:21 ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2017-02-10 12:21 ` Jani Nikula
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d1eqs0cs.fsf@intel.com \
--to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.