All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:23:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efcxtmhf.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (James Bottomley's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:07:33 -0700")

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:

> Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing
> the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want.  If it
> gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two.


There is also:

> Our Responsibilities
> ====================
> 
> Maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior
> and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to
> any instances of unacceptable behavior.
> 
> Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
> not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any
> contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening,
> offensive, or harmful.

Which is very problematic.
a) In append only logs like git we can not edit history.
   Making it a mainters responsibility to edit the history, to do the
   impossible is a problem.

b) There are no responsibilities of for people who are not Maintainers.
   That is another problem.

c) The entire tone of the reponsibilities section is out of line with a
   community where there are no enforcement powers only the power to
   accept or not accept a patch.  Only the power to persuade not to
   enforce.

Overall in the discussions I have heard people talking about persuading,
educating, and not feeding trolls.   Nowhere have I heard people talking
about policing the community which I understand that responsiblity
section to be talking about.

Increasingly I am getting the feeling that this document does not the
linux development community.  Perhaps a revert and trying to come up
with better language from scratch would be better.

I don't know how to rephrase that reponsibility section but if we don't
go with the revert something looks like it need sot be done there.

Eric

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 18:23:24 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87efcxtmhf.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1539202053.12644.8.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (James Bottomley's message of "Wed, 10 Oct 2018 13:07:33 -0700")

James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> writes:

> Resend to show accumulated tags and also to add a third patch listing
> the TAB as the reporting point as a few people seem to want.  If it
> gets the same level of support, I'll send it in with the other two.


There is also:

> Our Responsibilities
> ====================
> 
> Maintainers are responsible for clarifying the standards of acceptable behavior
> and are expected to take appropriate and fair corrective action in response to
> any instances of unacceptable behavior.
> 
> Maintainers have the right and responsibility to remove, edit, or reject
> comments, commits, code, wiki edits, issues, and other contributions that are
> not aligned to this Code of Conduct, or to ban temporarily or permanently any
> contributor for other behaviors that they deem inappropriate, threatening,
> offensive, or harmful.

Which is very problematic.
a) In append only logs like git we can not edit history.
   Making it a mainters responsibility to edit the history, to do the
   impossible is a problem.

b) There are no responsibilities of for people who are not Maintainers.
   That is another problem.

c) The entire tone of the reponsibilities section is out of line with a
   community where there are no enforcement powers only the power to
   accept or not accept a patch.  Only the power to persuade not to
   enforce.

Overall in the discussions I have heard people talking about persuading,
educating, and not feeding trolls.   Nowhere have I heard people talking
about policing the community which I understand that responsiblity
section to be talking about.

Increasingly I am getting the feeling that this document does not the
linux development community.  Perhaps a revert and trying to come up
with better language from scratch would be better.

I don't know how to rephrase that reponsibility section but if we don't
go with the revert something looks like it need sot be done there.

Eric









  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-10-10 23:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-10 20:07 [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:07 ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:08 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 1/3] code-of-conduct: Fix the ambiguity about collecting email addresses James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:08   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 22:17   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-10 22:17     ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-11  2:33   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11  2:33     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-15 20:58   ` Kees Cook
2018-10-15 20:58     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-10 20:09 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 2/3] code-of-conduct: Strip the enforcement paragraph pending community discussion James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:09   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 21:04   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Luck, Tony
2018-10-10 21:04     ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-10 21:19     ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 21:28       ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-10 21:28         ` Luck, Tony
2018-10-15 21:02     ` Kees Cook
2018-10-15 21:02       ` Kees Cook
2018-10-11  2:37   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11  2:37     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-10 20:10 ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 3/3] code-of-conduct: Add back the TAB as the central reporting point James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:10   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-10 20:13   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Alan Cox
2018-10-10 20:13     ` Alan Cox
2018-10-11  2:30     ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11  6:50     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-11  6:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-10-10 21:04   ` [Ksummit-discuss] " Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-10 21:04     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-10-10 23:23 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2018-10-10 23:23   ` [Ksummit-discuss] [PATCH v2 0/3] code of conduct fixes Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-10 23:41   ` Al Viro
2018-10-10 23:41     ` Al Viro
2018-10-11  0:00   ` James Bottomley
2018-10-11  3:11     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11  3:11       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2018-10-11 10:43   ` Rainer Fiebig
2018-10-11  6:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87efcxtmhf.fsf@xmission.com \
    --to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.